September 18, 2017 — Meeting Minutes
MINUTES
CITY PLAN COMMISSION/ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD
SEPTEMBER 18, 2017
CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
The City Plan Commission/Architectural Review Board of the City of Clayton, Missouri, met on the above date at 5:30 p.m. Upon roll call, the following responded:
Present: Steve Lichtenfeld, Chairman Joanne Boulton, Aldermanic Representative Ron Reim William Liebermann Scott Wilson Brian Maguire
Absent: Craig Owens, City Manager
Also in Attendance: Kevin O’Keefe, City Attorney Susan M. Istenes, AICP, Planning Director Anna Krane, Planner
Chairman Lichtenfeld welcomed everyone to the meeting and asked that all cell phones be turned off and that conversations take place outside the meeting room.
MINUTES
The minutes of both the August 28th and September 5th meetings were presented for approval. The minutes were approved after having been sent to
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW – ADDITION TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE – 110 TOPTON WAY
Jim Bulejski, project architect, was in attendance at the meeting.
Susan Istenes explained that the existing two-story home measures 3,896-square-feet and the proposed project consists of demolition of a previous rear addition, construction of a new 670-
2 square-foot rear addition with a below grade garage, a front porch with brick wall, a new exposed aggregate driveway, a rear yard retaining wall, a rear yard patio, painting the existing brick light grey, replacement of various sections of trim and siding, new shutters and a new front door. Exterior alterations will impact all four elevations of the existing home. The existing home has a primary building material of red brick with a secondary material of white siding. The home features white, double-hung casement windows and grey asphalt roof shingles. The proposed alterations include painting the brick and exposed concrete foundation a light grey color. Topton Way features multiple homes with painted brick or a primary building material color other than red brick. The UDD requires a stepped foundation so that no more than 1-foot of concrete foundation is exposed. The existing concrete foundation does not comply with the regulation and has areas of more than 1-foot exposure along the both side elevations. By painting the exposed foundation, it will blend with the brick and staff believes that the visual impacts would be mitigated. Staff is of the opinion that the proposed painted brick and concrete is compatible with the neighborhood character and meets the regulations of the UDD. The proposed rear addition will be mostly brick, size and shape to match the existing masonry. The existing home features white siding in the area under the gable roof and on the dormers. The existing siding will be replaced with white hardi- board lap siding. The area under the roof line of the proposed addition will also feature white hardi- board lap siding. Homes in the Clayton Gardens UDD are restricted to brick as a primary building material and one accent material that shall not exceed 25 percent of any elevation. Siding is used in the neighborhood as a secondary material, most often seen under gable roof ends. The proposed siding will exceed 25 percent on both side elevations; however, the siding is all located on dormers or above the gutter line. It is staff’s opinion that the siding is compatible with the neighborhood character and the style of the existing house.
The new front porch will extend approximately 8-feet from the front wall of the home. Uncovered front porches or patios are permitted to encroach into the front yard a maximum of 10 feet. The proposed porch will feature brick columns and a decorative metal railing, adding character to the existing home and creating depth along the front elevation. While front porches are not found on the majority of homes along the block, the proposed porch will add uniqueness to the existing home, while still being compatible with surrounding properties. Impervious coverage on the lot will be increased with the proposed project. Existing front yard impervious coverage is approximately 18.8 percent. Existing total lot impervious coverage is 49 percent. In the Clayton Gardens UDD, front yard coverage is limited to 30 percent and total lot coverage is limited to 40 percent with additional coverage allowed based on the location of the garage. Total lot coverage allowed on the subject property is increased to 50 percent with the inclusion of a below-grade, rear entry garage. Proposed front yard coverage is approximately 26 percent, which is below the maximum allowed. The proposed total lot coverage is 51.9 percent, which is above the maximum allowed. The applicant should reduce total lot coverage to meet the maximum allowed. The A/C units will remain in the existing location along the north elevation. The equipment will be screened from the public right-of-way and adjacent properties by landscaping. Trash will be stored within the proposed garage. The applicant is proposing a new exposed aggregate driveway and a white, carriage style garage door. A stamped concrete retaining wall is proposed along the driveway at various heights to replace an existing concrete retaining
3 wall. The proposed stamped concrete wall will be painted light grey to match the house. A 3-foot tall cedar shadowbox fence is proposed along the east end of the driveway on top of the retaining wall. The fence will match the existing rear yard fence. The project as proposed is in conformance with the requirements of the R-2 Single Family Dwelling District, the Clayton Gardens Urban Design District and the Architectural Review Guidelines, with the exception of total lot coverage. Staff is of the opinion that the design and materials of the alteration are compatible with the neighborhood and recommends approval with the following conditions, to be completed prior to the issuing of permits:
1. The applicant shall revise the proposed site plan and civil sheets to depict the front porch. 2. The applicant shall revise the impervious coverage calculations to correctly reference the maximum allowed coverage as 50 percent. 3. The applicant shall reduce proposed site coverage to a maximum of 50 percent. 4. The applicant shall revise the impervious coverage calculations to also note the proposed front yard coverage.
Mr. Bulejski indicated that the existing rear addition with a flat roof will be removed as part of this project as it’s not compatible. He then stated that he realizes the siding is over 25% but feels it is necessary.
Chairman Lichtenfeld stated that he’s okay with the extra siding. He stated that to his knowledge, no nearby property owner has indicated opposition to this project, even though all owners within 200 feet were notified of this request. He asked if coverage can be reduced to 50%.
Mr. Bulejski indicated that he believes it can be done and he would work on it with staff.
Joanne Boulton asked about MSD approval.
Anna Krane indicated that the project did not require site plan review and drainage will be reviewed by the Building Division during permit review.
Hearing no further questions or comments and hearing none from the audience, Ron Reim made a motion to approve per staff recommendations. The motion was seconded by Will Liebermann and unanimously approved by the Board.
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW – ELEVATED BRIDGE (OVER SOUTH HANLEY ROAD) – (CENTENE PROJECT)
Lance Cage and Eli Hoisington, HOK, project architect, were in attendance at the meeting.
Susan Istenes explained that Subdistrict 1 is located on the east side of Hanley Road between Forsyth Boulevard and Carondelet Plaza. The site measures 2.81 acres. The project includes a 30- story (plus 4 stories below grade), 1,387,644-gross-square-foot building including 625,735 gross
4 square feet of office, 63,223 gross square feet of retail, and a 1,757-space parking structure. On December 19, 2016, the Architectural Review Board voted to approve the architecture and design of Subdistrict 1. At that time the final design of the pedestrian bridge over South Hanley Road was not finalized. The pedestrian bridge was included in the traffic and circulation plans for the Special Development District (SDD), which was approved by the Board of Aldermen on January 10, 2017. The applicant has finalized the design concept for the pedestrian bridge and is requesting architectural approval. the proposed pedestrian bridge measures 84 feet 4 inches in length and spans from the existing Centene Plaza tower on the west side of Hanley Road to the Subdistrict 1 tower on the east side of Hanley Road. The primary façade material for the bridge is glass in varying shades of blue. The accent material will be silver painted aluminum. The applicant has provided documentation of an easement agreement with St. Louis County to allow for the proposed pedestrian bridge over Hanley Road. The proposed pedestrian bridge features varying shades of blue glass and silver aluminum. The proposed materials and colors are compatible with the building materials for the towers at either end of the proposed bridge. The different shades of blue will be presented in panel form resulting in a similar appearance to the existing Centene Plaza canopy. The shades of blue will introduce a subtle pop of color to the area and highlight the bridge without creating a potential distraction to vehicle operators below. It is the opinion of staff that the proposed building materials are compatible with surrounding buildings and design precedents for Subdistrict 1. The proposed pedestrian bridge features an interior screening system to allow views from the inside-out and not the outside-in, which will likely result in an opaque façade from the outside. While this treatment will limit the ability to see pedestrians moving across the bridge from street level, staff does not believe that visible pedestrian traffic in the bridge would have an impact on the street environment, and therefore, does not have any objections to the proposed screening system. The proposed form for the pedestrian bridge features a “pinch” in the middle with a slightly larger volume on the east end than on the west end. The angled form of the bridge creates a point of visual interest above a high volume road. The form is compatible with the sharp angles and irregular shapes featured on other building façades throughout the Centene Clayton Campus. Director Istenes concluded that the proposed project appears to be a generally well-designed, high- quality pedestrian bridge that exhibits distinctive and identifiable characteristics, is compatible with the overall SDD plan and the Subdistrict 1 plan and recommends approval as submitted.
Mr. Hoisington stated that staff’s description is excellent and he began a PowerPoint presentation. He stated that there will be an easement with St. Louis County and that bridge is 30’ clear above the street and 85-feet in length. He stated that the bridge is not just a simple bridge; it will provide visual interest as well.
Slides depicting the proposed bridge were shown.
Will Liebermann asked where and how water will drain.
Mr. Hoisington indicated that the bridge will have a centralized drainage system and water will flow down the columns. He added that the bridge’s structure elements will be completely contained.
5 Chairman Lichtenfeld commented that he likes the bridge’s simplicity and directness. He noted that the roof only intersects on the west.
Mr. Hoisington stated that was an engineering necessity.
Samples of the glass were shown.
Ron Reim commented that the bridge is a nice solution to what could have been a negative impact.
Joanne Boulton mentioned a glass bottom.
Mr. Hoisington stated that this is more about feeling enclosed.
Chairman Lichtenfeld asked if each panel has two colors.
Mr. Hoisington replied “yes”; one clear and one colored.
Will Liebermann asked if the glass is tempered or laminated.
Mr. Hoisington replied “tempered”. He added that the bridge will reflect out solar heat and will be temperature controlled.
Joanne Boulton asked about interior height.
Mr. Hoisington stated that he believes interior height is 12 feet.
Hearing no further questions or comments and hearing none from the audience, Scott Wilson made a motion to approve as submitted. The motion was seconded by Ron Reim and unanimously approved by the Board.
Chairman Lichtenfeld asked when they plan to construct the bridge.
Mr. Hoisington indicated that they plan to construct it the second half of next year.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT – RESTAURANT – 21 NORTH BEMISTON AVENUE
Russ Clark, business owner, was in attendance at the meeting.
Susan Istenes explained that the subject tenant space was most recently occupied by an art gallery, but is currently vacant. The restaurant space measures 1,100-square-feet and will have approximately 9 seats. The applicant has stated a desire for an outdoor dining area in the future with an estimated 6 seats. The applicant describes the restaurant as “a bakery serving fresh baked kolaches and coffee.” The restaurant will be open seven days a week, 6:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m.
6 Monday through Saturday and 7:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. on Sunday. A liquor license will not be required. Delivery service from the restaurant is not proposed. Deliveries to the restaurant will be made several times a week to the loading area located at the rear of the building and accessed from the east-west alley off of North Bemiston Avenue. Trash will be stored in dumpsters located in the rear of the building. The applicant does not intend to participate in a recycling program. The applicant will have access to three on-site parking spaces located behind the building for use by employees. There will be no on-site parking for patrons. Director Istenes indicated that staff is of the opinion that the proposed restaurant meets the requirements contained in the regulations governing conditional uses. The restaurant space is compatible in size to other restaurants and adequate public parking will be available along the street. The proposed hours of operation and method of deliveries are consistent with other restaurants in this area. Based on the information regarding the operation of the restaurant as provided by the applicant, staff is of the opinion that the proposed restaurant will be compatible with surrounding uses and recommends approval as requested. Mr. Clark voiced his excitement to be here in Clayton. Chairman Lichtenfeld asked if this is the same restaurant as the one on South Brentwood Boulevard. Mr. Clark replied “no”; he indicated that his a locally owned business. Joanne Boulton asked if this is going right across the street from City Hall. Mr. Clark replied “yes”. Will Liebermann asked why he does not plan on participating in a recycling program. Mr. Clark stated that there is limited space for containers, but if a recycling container was available to him that he would. Joanne Boulton stated that she encourages recycling. She added that this will be a great addition to downtown Clayton. Hearing no further questions or comments and hearing none from the audience, Ron Reim made a motion to recommend approval of the Conditional Use Permit to the Board of Aldermen as requested. The motion was seconded by Will Liebermann and unanimously approved by the members. Chairman Lichtenfeld asked when he plans to open. Mr. Clark replied “as soon as possible”. PLAN COMMISSION/ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD – REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF APPROVALS – 7700 DAVIS DRIVE (CENTRAL PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH) Tyler Stephens, project architect and Tim Page, Central Presbyterian Church’s Executive Administrator, were in attendance at the meeting. Susan Istenes explained that the following new construction was approved by the Plan Commission and Architectural Review Board on October 1, 2012:
7
• A 2-level, 91-space parking structure (and demolition of the 827 South Hanley building) • A 3,921-square-foot addition to connect the 818 & 820 North Biltmore Drive structures • A 3-story, 23,817-square-foot addition to the existing church structure
The Plan Commission and Architectural Review Board approvals were contingent upon the project receiving approval of three variances from the Board of Adjustment. The Board of Adjustment approved the final variances on March 7, 2013. The City’s Zoning Regulations specify that site plan and architectural review approvals will expire if building permits are not applied for within one year from the date of approval by the Plan Commission and/or Architectural Review Board. Because the site plan and architectural review approval was contingent upon variance approval by the Board of Adjustment, staff determined that the site plan and architectural approvals would expire on March 7, 2014 (one year after approval by the Board of Adjustment). A building permit for “Phase One” (a 2-level, 91-space parking structure and a 3,921-square-foot addition to connect the 818 & 820 North Biltmore Drive structures) was issued on July 10, 2013 and construction is now complete. On January 21, 2014 and December 1, 2014, the Plan Commission/Architectural Review Board approved one-year extensions of site plan and architectural approvals for the remainder of the project (a 3-story, 23,817-square-foot addition to the existing church structure), to expire on March 7, 2016. On November 10, 2015, the Plan Commission/Architectural Review Board approved a two-year extension of site plan and architectural approvals, which will expire on March 7, 2018. At this time, the applicant has not submitted an application for a building permit for the remainder of the project, and is therefore requesting a two-year extension to March 7, 2020. The Zoning Regulations state the applicant may request an extension to the one year time limit by submitting a written request to the Director of Planning and Development Services prior to the expiration of said approvals. On September 5, 2017, the applicant submitted a letter to the Planning Department formally requesting an extension of the site plan and architectural review approvals, which must now be approved at the sole discretion of the Plan Commission and Architectural Review Board (the requests are listed separately on the agenda and should be voted on independently). According to the applicant, the church has recently hired a senior pastor and needs more time to fundraise for the new structure. The applicant has also submitted a request to the Board of Adjustment for an extension to their variance approvals, which the Board will consider at their October 5, 2017 meeting. Director Istenes indicated that staff recommends approval of the requested two year time extension to the site plan and architectural review approvals, to expire on March 7, 2020, pursuant to the following conditions:
1. That all of the previous conditions approved by the Plan Commission and Architectural Review Board on October 1, 2012 remain in effect.
2. That the applicant receive approval of a time extension from the Board of Adjustment for the applicable variances.
8 Mr. Stephens advised the members that nothing with the project has changed; the church addition, which they refer to as Phase II, is what’s left of the project. He indicated that the church has hired a Senior Pastor. Mr. Page thanked the City for allowing them to ask for another continuance. He indicated that the church tends to move slowly; it took them 3 years to hire a Senior Pastor and they are happy to announce that Clay Smith is the new Senior Pastor who was hired early in 2017. He informed the members that the plan is not going to change; they simply need time for the new Senior Pastor to build rapport and trust with the congregation. Pastor Smith introduced himself to the members. He stated he is happy to be back in St. Louis; he was here from 2003-2011 and then moved to Virginia. He stated he fully supports the project as proposed and looks forward to pursuing it. He asked for more time to fund the remaining portion of the project. Chairman Lichtenfeld welcomed back Pastor Smith. Mr. Stephens indicated that the bulk of the project addition will introduce interior fellowship space and provide a connection from the church to the garage. Chairman Lichtenfeld asked if the addition will only be visible from Hanley Road and not impact Davis Drive or Biltmore Drive. Mr. Stephens confirmed that was correct. Will Liebermann asked the cost of the work. Mr. Stephens replied $8 million. Chairman Lichtenfeld referred to a letter of objection submitted by a neighbor. Scott Wilson asked why the objection; he asked if the project has been a continuous disruption. Mr. Stephens stated that what they’ve done is an improvement. Chairman Lichtenfeld stated that he is in support of the direction the church is going and although he does not want to set a precedent in granting extensions he sees no reason not to in this case. Joanne Boulton asked staff if the recently adopted landscape ordinance and/or any other code changes would affect this project. Susan Istenes indicated that the landscape ordinance would not affect this and that building code compliance would be reviewed by the Building Official for compliance with current codes. She reminded the members that the church will still have to go before the Board of Adjustment to request an extension of the approved variances. Hearing no further questions or comments, and hearing nothing from the audience, Ron Reim made a motion to approve the request for extension of the site plan approval until March 7, 2020 with staff recommendations. The motion was seconded by Scott Wilson and unanimously approved by the members.
9 Will Liebermann then made a motion to approve the request for extension of the architectural aspects of the project until March 7, 2020 with staff recommendations. The motion was seconded by Scott Wilson and unanimously approved by the Board.
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW – EXTERIOR ALTERATIONS – 8025 BONHOMME AVENUE (CLAYTON ON THE PARK) Jeff Davis with HOK, project architect, and Mark Rubin with Koman Group, were in attendance at the meeting. Susan Istenes explained that on July 5, 2017 the Architectural Review Board approved plans for exterior alterations and landscaping on the subject property. The applicant began demolition and site preparation without obtaining a permit. The applicant was told to apply for an Administrative Planning/Architectural Review Permit to verify constructions plans conform to the approved plans and conditions. Plans submitted with the permit application did not match the previously approved plans and the applicant was told to apply for Architectural Review Board to request approval of proposed changes. The subject property is located at the northeast corner of intersection between Brentwood Boulevard and Bonhomme Avenue. The proposed alterations to the previously approved project include revisions to the shape and material of the northwest patio, landscape beds, new aggregate walkway and the drop-off circle. Alterations also include removal of the seat wall and the addition of a concrete retaining wall. The plans for the patio at the northwest corner of the project area has been modified to remain as existing instead of replacing it with a new seating area as the previous plan proposed. The landscape bed located in the patio area have been reduced to include one tree as opposed to the three originally proposed. The shape of the landscape bed located between the new walkway, the Bonhomme Avenue sidewalk and the drop-off area has also been revised. The understory planting schedules for all landscape beds have been revised. The aggregate walkway spanning from the southwest corner of the property to the drop-off area has been revised and widened at the eastern end. The stairs leading from the right-of-way to the aggregate walkway have also been modified. The stairs will be concrete and are not noted to be stained as other sections of concrete for the project are. The seat wall previously proposed along the south curve of the walkway has been removed. To address the grade change on site, a concrete retaining wall will be installed along the northern curve of the walkway. The color of the concrete retaining wall is proposed to match the existing section of concrete retaining wall located in the same area. The applicant has revised the shape of the drop off area and paving plan. The existing concrete will be sandblasted and stained as previously proposed; however, the applicant has now chosen stain colors for the concrete. The drive concrete will be stained French grey and the concrete accent band will be stained charcoal. Director Istenes noted that the flow of pedestrian traffic between the private property and public right-of-way achieved by the revised plan will be similar to the original plan because the revisions do not change the general locations of the walkways, just the design detail. The removal of the previously proposed seat wall and expansion of the plain concrete retaining wall will have a visual impact on the site. The seat wall created a gathering space for pedestrians that will not be provided by the retaining wall. The plain concrete retaining wall will likely blend with the adjacent patio due to the coloring. The heavy amount of
10 grey pavement that was previously broken up by the wood top of the seat wall and larger landscape bed will now run together. The aggregate walkway will be composed of the “Recycled Fire Brick Blend,” which will introduce tan and brown colors into the site. This will help reduce the impact of the large grey colored pavement areas. The location of the landscape beds remain the same and while some changes were made to the planting schedule, the result of the changes should be minor. The applicant will need to provide an updated version of the electronic tree chart to verify the caliper inch replacement deficiency associated with the revised plan. The previously approved plan had a replacement deficiency of 15 caliper inches. The proposed exterior alterations will upgrade the appearance of the Bonhomme Avenue and Brentwood Boulevard intersection. The addition of City standard streetscape along Bonhomme Avenue will create a more cohesive transition into the downtown core and open up the first floor of the building. Staff believes that the proposed changes will result in a similar environment to the previously approved plan and recommends approval with the following conditions:
1. The applicant shall provide an updated electronic version of the Tree Chart prior to issuing of any permits.
2. A note shall be added to the plans that the street light electric lines/conduits shall be relocated to the back of the tree wells in the utility trench per City Detail C-1.
3. Irrigation conduits/lines for street trees shall be installed per City Detail C-1: a. Connect service line into existing line at hand hold just north of the construction limits on Brentwood Boulevard. b. Install new irrigation hand hole and flush valve at the eastern end of the project along Bonhomme Avenue.
4. Wayfinding signage shall be installed per the City’s 2017 Wayfinding Signage Project: a. One sign has been installed and shall be relocated. b. One sign could not be installed because of conflict with existing infrastructure and shall be installed as part of this project.
5. Clayton Public Works is currently in the design phase of the Brentwood Resurfacing Project. This project will include updating all ADA ramps adjacent to Brentwood Boulevard to current ADA standards. a. The Brentwood Boulevard ramps may be shifted north to become compliant. b. Ramps shall be designed/constructed to current ADA standards. c. Coordinate with Public Works regarding the final design. d. The Public Works Department requires “as builts” of these ramps be provided for review prior to issuance of permits.
6. Any changes to the appearance of the decorative ball located in the landscape bed within the drop off area must be administratively reviewed for approval or considered by the Architectural Review Board, per code requirements.
11
7. All improvements included in the scope of the project (on private property and public property) are to be completed at the same time. The applicant shall guarantee the completion of all improvements on the approved site plan by posting a Cash Escrow or Performance Bond listing the City of Clayton as the insured for 100 percent of the cost of the project prior to the issuing of permits. The applicant shall provide the cost of the project to the City to be verified by the Public Works Department and the Planning and Development Services Department. The Director of the Planning and Development Services Department has the authority to release the escrow or bond upon completion of the project as determined by a passed final inspection performed by City staff.
Mr. Davis explained that the overall intent of the project is the same and a result of “rebranding” the property. Chairman Lichtenfeld asked if the City’s contracted landscape architect has seen the plans. Anna Krane replied “not yet”. Mr. Davis noted that they are down one tree compared to the previous proposal. Joanne Boulton asked why they eliminated the seat wall. Mr. Davis indicated that the seat wall was eliminated due to the smaller space and steps. Chairman Lichtenfeld asked if the aggregate is pervious. Mr. Davis replied “yes”. Will Liebermann asked if they are using granite or limestone. Mr. Davis replied limestone, as it creates less dust. Mr. Rubin and Mr. Davis began a PowerPoint presentation. Slides depicting the original and current plans were shown. Chairman Lichtenfeld asked if Public Works has seen the newest proposal. Anna Krane informed the Chairman that approval from Public Works will be required. Joanne Boulton asked if the sidewalks meet ADA requirements. Mr. Rubin stated that the plan will comply with ADA when they submit to Public Works for the permit. Joanne Boulton asked if staff approves of the project. Susan Istenes indicated that staff has no objections. Hearing no further questions or comments and hearing none from the audience, Ron Reim made a motion to approve per staff recommendations. The motion was seconded by Scott Wilson and unanimously approved by the Board.
12 CITY BUSINESS – TOWNHOUSE DISCUSSION Director Istenes explained that she had not yet had time to draft a report; she wanted to note that although the land use code defines a townhouse, their use had somehow been dropped from the table of permitted uses and that this needs to be addressed. She stated that they will be allowable in the R4 through R7 multi-family zoning districts. Joanne Boulton asked what zoning district the current townhouse units are located. Director Istenes replied “R4”. Will Liebermann asked about the R3 District. Director Istenes noted that R3 is a duplex (2-unit) district; multi-family is considered to be 3 units or more. She stated she has no idea how these types of units got taken out of the code; she believes it was in error. Joanne Boulton announced that the Board of Aldermen has asked staff to address this issue while there is no pending townhome projects. Susan Istenes explained that the next meeting will include a public hearing regarding the townhouse issue.
******************************************************************************* Joanne Boulton informed everyone that she will not be attending the October 2nd meeting. Ron Reim asked staff if the Clayton on the Park project started work without a permit. Anna Krane replied “yes”. Brian Maguire asked when it is appropriate for a member to recuse her/himself. Joanne Boulton indicated that it is appropriate for a member to recuse her/himself when there is a financial connection between the member and the applicant. Director Istenes stated that if a member is unsure, she suggests contacting Kevin {O’Keefe}. She then reminded the members to please let Kathy know of planned absences from future meetings when possible. Scott Wilson stated he, also, would not be at the October 2nd meeting. Having no further business before the Commission this evening, the meeting adjourned at 7:18 p.m.
_______________________________ Recording Secretary