front yard coverage.

Mr. Bulejski indicated that the existing rear addition with a flat roof will be removed as part of this project as it’s not compatible. He then stated that he realizes the siding is over 25% but feels it is necessary.

Chairman Lichtenfeld stated that he’s okay with the extra siding. He stated that to his knowledge, no nearby property owner has indicated opposition to this project, even though all owners within 200 feet were notified of this request. He asked if coverage can be reduced to 50%.

Mr. Bulejski indicated that he believes it can be done and he would work on it with staff.

Joanne Boulton asked about MSD approval.

Anna Krane indicated that the project did not require site plan review and drainage will be reviewed by the Building Division during permit review.

Hearing no further questions or comments and hearing none from the audience, Ron Reim made a motion to approve per staff recommendations. The motion was seconded by Will Liebermann and unanimously approved by the Board.

ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW – ELEVATED BRIDGE (OVER SOUTH HANLEY ROAD) – (CENTENE PROJECT)

Lance Cage and Eli Hoisington, HOK, project architect, were in attendance at the meeting.

Susan Istenes explained that Subdistrict 1 is located on the east side of Hanley Road between Forsyth Boulevard and Carondelet Plaza. The site measures 2.81 acres. The project includes a 30- story (plus 4 stories below grade), 1,387,644-gross-square-foot building including 625,735 gross

The site measures 2.81 acres. The project includes a 30- story (plus 4 stories below grade), 1,387,644-gross-square-foot building including 625,735 gross

4 square feet of office, 63,223 gross square feet of retail, and a 1,757-space parking structure. On December 19, 2016, the Architectural Review Board voted to approve the architecture and design of Subdistrict 1. At that time the final design of the pedestrian bridge over South Hanley Road was not finalized. The pedestrian bridge was included in the traffic and circulation plans for the Special Development District (SDD), which was approved by the Board of Aldermen on January 10, 2017. The applicant has finalized the design concept for the pedestrian bridge and is requesting architectural approval. the proposed pedestrian bridge measures 84 feet 4 inches in length and spans from the existing Centene Plaza tower on the west side of Hanley Road to the Subdistrict 1 tower on the east side of Hanley Road. The primary façade material for the bridge is glass in varying shades of blue. The accent material will be silver painted aluminum. The applicant has provided documentation of an easement agreement with St. Louis County to allow for the proposed pedestrian bridge over Hanley Road. The proposed pedestrian bridge features varying shades of blue glass and silver aluminum. The proposed materials and colors are compatible with the building materials for the towers at either end of the proposed bridge. The different shades of blue will be presented in panel form resulting in a similar appearance to the existing Centene Plaza canopy. The shades of blue will introduce a subtle pop of color to the area and highlight the bridge without creating a potential distraction to vehicle operators below. It is the opinion of staff that the proposed building materials are compatible with surrounding buildings and design precedents for Subdistrict 1. The proposed pedestrian bridge features an interior screening system to allow views from the inside-out and not the outside-in, which will likely result in an opaque façade from the outside. While this treatment will limit the ability to see pedestrians moving across the bridge from street level, staff does not believe that visible pedestrian traffic in the bridge would have an impact on the street environment, and therefore, does not have any objections to the proposed screening system. The proposed form for the pedestrian bridge features a “pinch” in the middle with a slightly larger volume on the east end than on the west end. The angled form of the bridge creates a point of visual interest above a high volume road. The form is compatible with the sharp angles and irregular shapes featured on other building façades throughout the Centene Clayton Campus. Director Istenes concluded that the proposed project appears to be a generally well-designed, high- quality pedestrian bridge that exhibits distinctive and identifiable characteristics, is compatible with the overall SDD plan and the Subdistrict 1 plan and recommends approval as submitted.

Mr. Hoisington stated that staff’s description is excellent and he began a PowerPoint presentation. He stated that there will be an easement with St. Louis County and that bridge is 30’ clear above the street and 85-feet in length. He stated that the bridge is not just a simple bridge; it will provide visual interest as well.

Slides depicting the proposed bridge were shown.

Will Liebermann asked where and how water will drain.

Mr. Hoisington indicated that the bridge will have a centralized drainage system and water will flow down the columns. He added that the bridge’s structure elements will be completely contained.

The applicant has stated a desire for an outdoor dining area in the future with an estimated 6 seats. The applicant describes the restaurant as “a bakery serving fresh baked kolaches and coffee.” The restaurant will be open seven days a week, 6:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m.

6 Monday through Saturday and 7:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. on Sunday. A liquor license will not be required. Delivery service from the restaurant is not proposed. Deliveries to the restaurant will be made several times a week to the loading area located at the rear of the building and accessed from the east-west alley off of North Bemiston Avenue. Trash will be stored in dumpsters located in the rear of the building. The applicant does not intend to participate in a recycling program. The applicant will have access to three on-site parking spaces located behind the building for use by employees. There will be no on-site parking for patrons. Director Istenes indicated that staff is of the opinion that the proposed restaurant meets the requirements contained in the regulations governing conditional uses. The restaurant space is compatible in size to other restaurants and adequate public parking will be available along the street. The proposed hours of operation and method of deliveries are consistent with other restaurants in this area. Based on the information regarding the operation of the restaurant as provided by the applicant, staff is of the opinion that the proposed restaurant will be compatible with surrounding uses and recommends approval as requested. Mr. Clark voiced his excitement to be here in Clayton. Chairman Lichtenfeld asked if this is the same restaurant as the one on South Brentwood Boulevard. Mr. Clark replied “no”; he indicated that his a locally owned business. Joanne Boulton asked if this is going right across the street from City Hall. Mr. Clark replied “yes”. Will Liebermann asked why he does not plan on participating in a recycling program. Mr. Clark stated that there is limited space for containers, but if a recycling container was available to him that he would. Joanne Boulton stated that she encourages recycling. She added that this will be a great addition to downtown Clayton. Hearing no further questions or comments and hearing none from the audience, Ron Reim made a motion to recommend approval of the Conditional Use Permit to the Board of Aldermen as requested. The motion was seconded by Will Liebermann and unanimously approved by the members. Chairman Lichtenfeld asked when he plans to open. Mr. Clark replied “as soon as possible”. PLAN COMMISSION/ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD – REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF APPROVALS – 7700 DAVIS DRIVE (CENTRAL PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH) Tyler Stephens, project architect and Tim Page, Central Presbyterian Church’s Executive Administrator, were in attendance at the meeting. Susan Istenes explained that the following new construction was approved by the Plan Commission and Architectural Review Board on October 1, 2012:

PLAN COMMISSION/ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD – REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF APPROVALS – 7700 DAVIS DRIVE (CENTRAL PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH) Tyler Stephens, project architect and Tim Page, Central Presbyterian Church’s Executive Administrator, were in attendance at the meeting. Susan Istenes explained that the following new construction was approved by the Plan Commission and Architectural Review Board on October 1, 2012:

7

• A 2-level, 91-space parking structure (and demolition of the 827 South Hanley building) • A 3,921-square-foot addition to connect the 818 & 820 North Biltmore Drive structures • A 3-story, 23,817-square-foot addition to the existing church structure

The Plan Commission and Architectural Review Board approvals were contingent upon the project receiving approval of three variances from the Board of Adjustment. The Board of Adjustment approved the final variances on March 7, 2013. The City’s Zoning Regulations specify that site plan and architectural review approvals will expire if building permits are not applied for within one year from the date of approval by the Plan Commission and/or Architectural Review Board. Because the site plan and architectural review approval was contingent upon variance approval by the Board of Adjustment, staff determined that the site plan and architectural approvals would expire on March 7, 2014 (one year after approval by the Board of Adjustment). A building permit for “Phase One” (a 2-level, 91-space parking structure and a 3,921-square-foot addition to connect the 818 & 820 North Biltmore Drive structures) was issued on July 10, 2013 and construction is now complete. On January 21, 2014 and December 1, 2014, the Plan Commission/Architectural Review Board approved one-year extensions of site plan and architectural approvals for the remainder of the project (a 3-story, 23,817-square-foot addition to the existing church structure), to expire on March 7, 2016. On November 10, 2015, the Plan Commission/Architectural Review Board approved a two-year extension of site plan and architectural approvals, which will expire on March 7, 2018. At this time, the applicant has not submitted an application for a building permit for the remainder of the project, and is therefore requesting a two-year extension to March 7, 2020. The Zoning Regulations state the applicant may request an extension to the one year time limit by submitting a written request to the Director of Planning and Development Services prior to the expiration of said approvals. On September 5, 2017, the applicant submitted a letter to the Planning Department formally requesting an extension of the site plan and architectural review approvals, which must now be approved at the sole discretion of the Plan Commission and Architectural Review Board (the requests are listed separately on the agenda and should be voted on independently). According to the applicant, the church has recently hired a senior pastor and needs more time to fundraise for the new structure. The applicant has also submitted a request to the Board of Adjustment for an extension to their variance approvals, which the Board will consider at their October 5, 2017 meeting. Director Istenes indicated that staff recommends approval of the requested two year time extension to the site plan and architectural review approvals, to expire on March 7, 2020, pursuant to the following conditions: