Citation in context

#q66608020
minutes 2018-10-23 City meeting records #q66608020 Open original ↗

October 23, 2018 — Meeting Minutes

This is the minutes of the City of Clayton Board of Aldermen meeting held October 23, 2018. It records attendance, approval of the October 9, 2018 minutes (approved unanimously), public requests (none), and discussion and actions on items including terminating Tax Increment Financing for the Carondelet Village redevelopment area (background and original project costs and reimbursable TIF amount are noted), authorization of a banking services agreement following an RFP (staff recommendation to remain with Commerce Bank), and an appeal of an Architectural Review Board signage decision for a Moneta/Monetta sign. The excerpts also note routine items (community events) and the meeting adjournment time.
Cited passage

10-23-18 BOA Minutes October 23, 2018 Page 7 of 8

Minutes are recorded based on Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised, 11th, 2013 Edition

At the Board’s direction staff will:

And plus the fact that that sign, no sign was allowed in the ordinance, I believe, if it doesn’t face a street where the south faces the alley I think that’s correct. That’s what I said about the sign on Maryland…it faces the alley. So, but anyway that’s what came in my mind and I thought then it would make better sense if it architecturally doesn’t look good there….I think it does but if it doesn’t, if that wasn’t going to be a win then why don’t we leave the north face sign as it is, trim the trees back….I know there’s a monument sign there, but if you’re at the corner….”

City Attorney: “Maybe I didn’t make my question clear. What is the error in the decision of the ARB?”

Mr. Brown: “I’m not saying there is an error in the decision of the ARB.”

City Attorney: “Thank you, and the other question was as to whether there is or was a conflict of interest on the part of Mr. Lintz is there any factual information that your client gave you with regard to how they perceive, how they reached that conclusion?”

Mr. Brown: “What I had in the letter is exactly what they told me.”

City Attorney: “They felt it was…it’s a feeling?”

Mr. Brown: “In their opinion, yes.”

City Attorney: “Thank you, that’s all the questions that I have. Thank you very much.”

Mayor Sanger stated that the Board will take this under advisement and will come back with a decision at the next meeting.

Brown: “In their opinion, yes.”

City Attorney: “Thank you, that’s all the questions that I have. Thank you very much.”

Mayor Sanger stated that the Board will take this under advisement and will come back with a decision at the next meeting. DISCUSSION OF ICE RINK OPTIONS

Patty DeForrest provided the Board with an overview and update on the options for the Ice Rink project (handout attached). After much discussion, Patty noted that she feels that the best-case option is Scenario 2 because they would still get the design and the use of the building, the rink, and the drop-off site. Patty also explained the proposed LEED Certification scoring. She feels that it will be a more affordable building to run/manager over time and asked for the Board’s direction.

materials.

Ice Rink Task Force to participate and provide feedback and/or endorsement.

Original document

This document is too large to preview here. Open the original ↗.

Open original ↗ Open full document Report an error →