So we won't have a very large breadth of comments to get back from people who have been on the other side, from the development side as we're using it. But I do think before we make any changes, it will be important to have discussions with both the private side as they interacted with the point system, as well as you know, an ARB discussion and a Board of Aldermen discussion to see how they align. That's also one of the items that once we have a comprehensive plan or if there's any new strategic plan updates from any of our other commissions or the board, those will also be really important documents for us to help evaluate what categories we have For point systems and how they relate to key strategic idea items that have been identified for the city moving forward is right now. You know we're kind of a lot of those items that are listed in the point categories were pulled from lead standards, which is important sustainability is important, but I do think there's a lot of other equally important initiatives going along in the city that aren't. Really represented or highlighted the same degree within that point system so that's definitely a conversation that will need to have here. Sometime before we do a code analysis. Well, which raises my next question.