Citation in context
March 6, 2017 — Meeting Minutes
Cited passage
2017.
She noted that there are still outstanding landscape and Storm Water Pollution & Prevention Plan (SWPPP) issues which could change if traffic patterns change. She informed the members that overall, staff approves the design and recommends approval of the rezoning and Planned Unit Development to the Board of Aldermen with the following conditions:
13
Comments, dated January 14, 2017, Review 2.
Consolidation Plat.
recommendations regarding turning movements and traffic improvements. Should those revisions require re-review by the Architectural Review Board and/or Plan Commission, the applicant shall apply for the appropriate amendments, as determined by staff. Chairman Lichtenfeld questioned how they are to proceed without St. Louis County’s recommendations as stated in staff recommendation No. 4. Susan Istenes referred to the email dated today from the County which reads, in part “Your sight line calculations are based on drivers exiting onto Hanley Road looking over cars approximately 4’ tall; a 4’ tall vehicle is not a reasonable assumption. Likewise, it is evident that your proposed “Green T” will not fit along Clayton Road and thus your team altered the design; but, they simply introduced a single longitudinal median on Clayton Road on the south side of a two way travel lane. The submittal of a single longitudinal median configured as you have it, does not offer proper channelization nor dedicated lanes and directs left turning traffic (EB) head on into traffic traveling WB.