Citation in context

#qf8762938
minutes 2017-03-06 City meeting records #qf8762938 Open original ↗

March 6, 2017 — Meeting Minutes

This document is the City Plan Commission/Architectural Review Board minutes for Clayton, Missouri, from the March 6, 2017 meeting. It records attendance, approval of the February 21, 2017 minutes, and discussion and reviews of multiple development projects including a continued review for a new single‑family residence at 1 Tuscany Park, a retail/bank building with rooftop HVAC screening and a 24‑hour ATM vestibule (swipe‑card access), and a mixed‑use rezoning/Planned Unit Development/site plan for 7601–7651 Clayton Road. The excerpts record motions and votes: approval of the retail project per staff recommendation (unanimous), recusal of one member (Scott Wilson) on the mixed‑use project, and a unanimous vote to reschedule the next meeting from March 20 to March 27; other matters noted include outstanding county review requests, added landscaping quantities (64 trees along Clayton Road and 10 along Westwood), and various outstanding design, access, and stormwater issues.
Cited passage
2. The applicant shall address all outstanding Intuition & Logic comments, dated January 8,

2017.

She noted that there are still outstanding landscape and Storm Water Pollution & Prevention Plan (SWPPP) issues which could change if traffic patterns change. She informed the members that overall, staff approves the design and recommends approval of the rezoning and Planned Unit Development to the Board of Aldermen with the following conditions:

13

Comments, dated January 14, 2017, Review 2.

Consolidation Plat.

recommendations regarding turning movements and traffic improvements. Should those revisions require re-review by the Architectural Review Board and/or Plan Commission, the applicant shall apply for the appropriate amendments, as determined by staff. Chairman Lichtenfeld questioned how they are to proceed without St. Louis County’s recommendations as stated in staff recommendation No. 4. Susan Istenes referred to the email dated today from the County which reads, in part “Your sight line calculations are based on drivers exiting onto Hanley Road looking over cars approximately 4’ tall; a 4’ tall vehicle is not a reasonable assumption. Likewise, it is evident that your proposed “Green T” will not fit along Clayton Road and thus your team altered the design; but, they simply introduced a single longitudinal median on Clayton Road on the south side of a two way travel lane. The submittal of a single longitudinal median configured as you have it, does not offer proper channelization nor dedicated lanes and directs left turning traffic (EB) head on into traffic traveling WB.

Original document

This document is too large to preview here. Open the original ↗.