Citation in context

#qf1ad520c
minutes 2015-07-20 City meeting records #qf1ad520c Open original ↗

July 20, 2015 — Meeting Minutes

These are the minutes of the City Plan Commission/Architectural Review Board meeting held July 20, 2015. The document records attendance, approval of prior meeting minutes, and detailed reviews of site plan/architectural proposals including a new 4,060 sq. ft. single-family residence at 148 North Central Avenue and other building/parking and material-change requests. It notes presentations by architects/engineers/owners, staff comments and questions from commissioners, and records a motion by Mark Winings, seconded by Ron Reim, approving one application per staff recommendation (unanimously).
Cited passage

MINUTES

CITY PLAN COMMISSION/ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD

JULY 20, 2015

The City Plan Commission/Architectural Review Board of the City of Clayton, Missouri, met upon the above date at 5:30 p.m. Upon roll call, the following responded:

Present: Chairman Steve Lichtenfeld Mark Winings, Aldermanic Representative Craig Owens, City Manager Ron Reim Josh Corson Sherry Eisenberg

Absent: Vacant Seat

Also Present: Susan M. Istenes, AICP, Director of Planning & Development Services Louis Clayton, Planner Kevin O’Keefe, City Attorney

Chairman Lichtenfeld asked that all cell phone ringers be turned off, that conversations take place outside the meeting room and that those who wish to speak approach the podium and to be sure the green light on the microphone is on for property recording of this meeting.

MINUTES

The minutes of the June 15th and July 6th, 2015 meetings were approved, after having been previously distributed to each member.

SITE PLAN/ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW – NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE – 148 NORTH CENTRAL AVENUE

Lauren Strutman, project architect, was in attendance at the meeting. Also in attendance were David Volz, project civil engineer, Bruce Korn, builder, and Kent & Patricia Chapin, owners.

Susan Istenes explained that this is a request for review of the site plan associated with the proposed construction of a new 4,060 square foot single family residence (excluding basement) with a below grade, front entry garage. The existing 3,712 square foot home is to be

Susan Istenes explained that this is a request for review of the site plan associated with the proposed construction of a new 4,060 square foot single family residence (excluding basement) with a below grade, front entry garage. The existing 3,712 square foot home is to be

2 demolished. The height of the proposed residence is 32-feet 11 7/8-inches as measured from the average existing grade to the mean height of the roof. The 8,008-square-foot property is located on the east side of North Central Avenue between Pershing Avenue and Maryland Avenue and has a zoning designation of R-3 One and Two Family Dwelling District. Geothermal heating and cooling is proposed and therefore no HVAC units will be located outside the building. A generator and pool equipment are proposed in the rear yard and will be screened by a new retaining wall and an existing wood privacy fence. Trash will be stored in a 52-square-foot trash enclosure located beneath the front terrace adjacent to the garage. The existing impervious coverage on site is 62.1 percent. The new plans decrease the impervious coverage to 54.5 percent, which is below the maximum allowable impervious coverage of 55 percent. The proposed impervious coverage for the required front yard is 48.7 percent which is above the allowable 45 percent. In instances where an applicant can demonstrate just cause, the Plan Commission has the authority to approve a modification of up to an additional 5 percent of the impervious coverage requirements. The Plan Commission has historically approved similar requests for projects in Old Town primarily due to the narrowness of the lots and the prevalence of front-entry garages. The applicant has not submitted justification for this request. The existing storm water runoff, according to the MSD 15 year, 20 minute calculation, is 0.52 cubic feet per second (CFS). The proposed runoff is 0.49 CFS, which represents a decrease in 0.03 CFS, and therefore, onsite storm water mitigation is not required. Downspouts will be piped to pop-up bubblers in the front and rear yard. The rear yard pop-up bubbler should be relocated at least 10 feet from the rear property line. The Public Works Department has reviewed the site plan and finds the storm water plan acceptable. The proposed landscape design features a variety of understory trees, ornamental grasses and shrubs that are appropriate for the size of the site and character of the neighborhood. The landscape plan shows the removal of 48 caliper inches of deciduous trees, of which 24.5 caliper inches require replacement. The landscape plan proposes 26 caliper inches of new deciduous trees. The City’s contracted landscape architect is of the opinion that the proposed trees are suitable for the site and the existing trees to remain are shown to be protected and preserved per City guidelines. The Public Works Department has approved the applicant’s request to remove an existing 30-caliper-inch street tree and requires a payment of $7,926 to the City’s Forestry Fund. The City Forester recommends that the new street tree be a 4-caliper-inch Swamp White Oak rather than the proposed Red Maple. Exterior lighting is proposed at all doors and the garage. All exterior lights will be 75 watts or below. Susan stated that the proposed home is compatible with surrounding homes in the neighborhood. Storm water will be adequately managed on site, the landscape plan provides for a variety of new trees, shrubs, and groundcover that is suitable for the area and that the height and setbacks as proposed are in conformance with the requirements of the R-3 One and Two Family Dwelling District. The project meets the criteria for site plan approval and therefore, staff recommends approval with the following conditions:

building permit. (Susan noted that the $8,338 amount listed in the staff report is incorrect); and

3

Original document

This document is too large to preview here. Open the original ↗.