#qe3d778e8 — Plan Commission & Architectural Review Board

Citation in context

#qe3d778e8

minutes 2016-03-28 City meeting records #qe3d778e8 Open original ↗

March 28, 2016 — Meeting Minutes

This document is the minutes of the City Plan Commission/Architectural Review Board meeting held March 7, 2016 (included in a March 28, 2016 archive). It records roll call and attendance, public comment about the Maryland School Townhome Project, approval of prior meeting minutes, and discussions of specific agenda items including an amendment to a previously approved site plan for 53 Arundel Place and an architectural review for a two-story addition at 26 Carrswold Drive. Concrete actions recorded in the excerpts include approval of the February 16, 2016 minutes, unanimous approval of the Arundel Place amendment (motion seconded by Mark Winings), administrative approval of mechanical-equipment relocation at 53 Arundel, and project details such as a proposed 909-square-foot, 2‑story addition with 26-foot midpoint roof height.

Cited passage

He stated that this Commission/Board in legislative matters as well as the Board of Aldermen speaks by its vote; it is the judgement that finds a majority that expresses the view of the Commission; and that each member has his/her own reasons for voting a certain way and those reasons may differ between members and that is certainly okay. He stated that he disagrees with the comments made that the members have an obligation to explain or specify the

6 reasons for voting a certain way/turning down application; that the members in contrary do not have an obligation to express details of reasoning, even though people may be curious as to those reasons. Prudence suggests that the vote speaks for itself. He stated that is how this Commission conducted themselves and he commended them for that. He added that he believes this Commission discharges itself very well and to keep up the good work.

Susan Istenes explained that this is a request to clad an existing concrete wall on the north side of the site with the same hardwood material to complement to the recently completed building and site improvements. She stated that staff recommends approval as requested.

Mr. Rubin noted that this is a very minor alteration to enhance the new restaurant’s entrance.

Mark Winings asked if there is a sign for Parigi.

Mr. Rubin replied “yes”, it is on the corner.

Josh Corson commented that this is better than EIFS.

Mr. Rubin agreed.

Hearing no further questions or comments, Pepe Finn made a motion to approve as requested. The motion was seconded by Craig Owens and unanimously approved by the members.

*******************************************************************************

Pepe Finn stated that she thought the project (Maryland School Townhome) was going to continue to be discussed at a future meeting.

Susan Istenes indicated that it was scheduled on tonight’s agenda for further discussion, but the applicant withdrew the proposal.

Mark Winings asked about the timeline regarding the tree ordinance.

Louis Clayton indicated that last Monday, staff held a workshop; 25-30 people attended both developers and members of the public. There was an open comment period and an on-line survey. He stated that April 18th is the tentative date for the ordinance to be presented to the Plan Commission and the Board of Aldermen in late May.

Acting Chairman Ron Reim asked if the newest version is similar to what was presented previously.

Louis Clayton stated that much of the language is the same; the major difference is a tree canopy requirement for residential.

Barvian stated that there are other concerns, but they are being dealt with elsewhere. He noted the fence is currently in the wrong place, but where it is being moved to is the approved location.

Acting Chairman Ron Reim asked for confirmation that Mr. Barvian is okay with the fence relocation (as proposed).

Mr. Barvian replied “yes”.

Acting Chairman Ron Reim asked about the water issue.

Mr. Barvian stated that he hoped the concrete would be removed.

Pepe Finn asked what concrete he is referring to.

Mr. Barvian indicated it is a triangular piece that’s been there.

Mr. LaDriere informed the members that after Christmas there was a highly unusual rainfall and on a Saturday he was at the property; an obstruction was discovered which was cleared. He believes that resolved the water issue, but tonight will be the test (based on the forecasted rain).

Acting Chairman Ron Reim asked if there’s been a water issue since that time after Christmas.

Mr. LaDriere stated that he did not believe so, but he knew that the inspector Jerome Toney has visited the site.

Nicole Barvian commented that the shared driveway is not wide enough to park on; it’s only supposed to be used for ingress/egress, but because the Min’s moved the garage, their driveway leads to nowhere, so now they park in front of the house, blocking her and her husband’s ingress and egress.

Acting Chairman Ron Reim referred to the easement.

City Attorney O’Keefe stated that he understood that the 53 easement is for the benefit of 51.

Ms. Barvian informed the members that there are two easements.

Kevin O’Keefe stated that the easements allow the right of passage for both owners.

Hearing no further questions or comments, Acting Chairman Ron Reim called for a motion.

Josh Corson made a motion to approve as submitted. The motion was seconded by Mark Winings and unanimously approved by the members.

ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW – ADDITION TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE – 26 CARRSWOLD DRIVE

The motion was seconded by Mark Winings and unanimously approved by the members. ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW – ADDITION TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE – 26 CARRSWOLD DRIVE

Jay Sparks, project architect, was in attendance at the meeting.

Susan Istenes explained that this is a request to construct a 909-square-foot, 2-story addition to the north side of the existing home. The addition is the same height as the existing home, measuring 26 feet from existing grade to the midpoint of the new roof. There are no adjacent homes to the north. The primary building materials for the proposed addition are brick and limestone accents. A slate roof and black windows are also proposed. All new materials will match existing. The applicant has submitted project approval from the subdivision trustees.

Mr. Sparks presented a color rendering to the members. He stated that the materials will all match; that the first floor will be a screened in porch and the second floor will be one large room. He noted that the addition will take up about ¾ of the existing terrace, so basically there will be very little land disturbance.

Acting Chairman Ron Reim commented that it is a nice addition. He asked if the chimney is existing.

Mr. Sparks replied “yes”.

Hearing no further questions or comments and hearing none from the audience, Craig Owens made a motion to approve as submitted. The motion was seconded by Sherry Eisenberg and unanimously approved by the Board.

Acting Chairman Ron Reim asked when they hope to begin construction.

Mr. Sparks indicated that the contractors have stated that they can begin as soon as the building permit is ready (a few weeks he hopes).

ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW – EXTERIOR ALTERATION – 8025 BONHOMME AVENUE (CLAYTON ON THE PARK)

Mark Rubin, Koman Properties/COTP, LLC, owner, was in attendance at the meeting.

Kevin O’Keefe asked if he could interrupt the meeting for a moment to make a brief comment, as he has to leave early this evening. He addressed the members regarding the comments that were made at the beginning of this meeting (noting that he was sorry those commentators had left already) regarding this Commission’s actions and vote involving the proposed Maryland School Townhome Project. He stated that this Commission/Board in legislative matters as well as the Board of Aldermen speaks by its vote; it is the judgement that finds a majority that expresses the view of the Commission; and that each member has his/her own reasons for voting a certain way and those reasons may differ between members and that is certainly okay. He stated that he disagrees with the comments made that the members have an obligation to explain or specify the

Acting Chairman Ron Reim asked if the newest version is similar to what was presented previously. Louis Clayton stated that much of the language is the same; the major difference is a tree canopy requirement for residential.

A brief discussion ensued regarding new Centene development. Acting Chairman Ron Reim asked if they will be presenting in conceptual form before presenting for formal review. Susan Istenes indicated that she did not know; however, staff will recommend them doing so. The issue of parking was brought up. Susan indicated that a parking study would be required.

Craig Owens informed the other members that the City sent out a Request for Proposal for development proposals for Wydown/Hanley, Brentwood/Forsyth and the old police building (227 South Central Avenue); the City received proposals for the Wydown/Hanley and Brentwood/Forsyth sites, but none yet for the old police building site.