Citation in context

#qc56a0025
minutes 2015-04-20 City meeting records #qc56a0025 Open original ↗

April 20, 2015 — Meeting Minutes

This is the minutes of the City Plan Commission/Architectural Review Board meeting held April 20, 2015. It records attendance, approval of prior meeting minutes with specified corrections, and multiple site plan and architectural review items for new single‑family residences and other developments. The excerpts detail project descriptions (lot addresses, building sizes and heights, impervious coverage percentages, stormwater runoff figures and mitigation measures, tree caliper inches and landscaping recommendations), staff recommendations, and motions/approvals (including a unanimous approval noted for at least one item).
Cited passage
2. To ensure the future maintenance and operation of the pervious pavement, the applicant

She stated that no trees will be removed; however, 26 caliper inches of new trees will be planted. She added that the driveway will be located between two existing street trees.

6

Mr. Volz stated that water runs north and that pop up emitters and a drywell is proposed which will result in less water flow. He made note of the generator at the rear of the site that runs to the front pop-up emitters as there is no gravity.

Acting Chairman Liberman asked about the proposed generator.

Mr. Volz indicated that it is natural gas.

Acting Chairman Liberman asked why it’s located so far from the house.

Ms. Strutman stated that it is preferred to be 5-feet from the rear and side property lines.

Acting Chairman Liberman asked if the generator will kick on if the power goes out.

Mr. Volz replied “yes”. He stated there’s a transfer switch inside the house.

Acting Chairman Liberman asked about noise.

Mr. Volz indicated that it’s no louder than an AC unit.

Acting Chairman Liberman asked about the trees on the south side.

Ms. Strutman indicated that those are the neighbor’s trees.

Josh Corson asked why the generator isn’t closer to the house.

Ms. Strutman stated that they want more green space.

Acting Chairman Liberman asked if there were any additional comments or questions from the members or the audience.

None were received.

Being no further questions or comments, Josh Corson made a motion to approve the site plan per staff recommendation. The motion was seconded by Mark Winings and unanimously approved by the members.

The architectural aspects of the project were now up for review.

Louis Clayton explained that this is a request for consideration of the design and materials associated with the proposed construction of a 4,585-square-foot single-family residence with a below grade, front-loading garage. The height of the proposed residence is +/- 28-feet 3-

Two black metal and glass garage doors are proposed. A 6-foot tall cedar fence is proposed along the northern property

4 line. A cedar fence screen wall and hedge is proposed on the east side of the home. Brick retaining walls ranging between 5 and 11 feet tall are proposed adjacent to the driveway and front staircase. Louis stated that the project as proposed is in conformance with the requirements of the R-2 Single Family Dwelling District and the Architectural Review Guidelines. Staff is of the opinion that the design is compatible in terms of mass, height, and design with existing nearby structures and recommends approval as submitted.

Mr. Ottolino presented color renderings and material samples to the Board, including windows (black with mullions), architectural shingle roof, brick, cast stone and cement board.

Acting Chairman Liberman asked about the windows.

Mr. Ottolino explained the different types of windows and which ones are operable and which ones are fixed.

Acting Chairman Liberman commented that it’s a nice-looking house.

Mark Winings referred to the staff report, noting that it states that the cement board does not exceed 25%. He asked if that is an ordinance.

Louis Clayton stated that the City’s ARB Guidelines limit accent materials to no more than 25% of any elevation.

Mark Winings commented that it seems like more than 25%.

Louis Clayton stated that the applicant provides the calculations and they are verified by staff.

Mark Winings agreed that although it is different, it is a nice-looking house.

Acting Chairman Liberman stated that he wished the rendering was lighter. He asked if there were any comments or questions from the audience.

None were received.

Being no further questions or comments, Craig Owens made a motion to approve as submitted. The motion was seconded by Josh Corson and unanimously approved by the Board.

SITE PLAN REVIEW/ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW – NEW CONSTRUCTION – SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE – 141 LINDEN AVENUE

Lauren Strutman, project architect, was in attendance at the meeting.

The motion was seconded by Josh Corson and unanimously approved by the Board. SITE PLAN REVIEW/ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW – NEW CONSTRUCTION – SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE – 141 LINDEN AVENUE

Lauren Strutman, project architect, was in attendance at the meeting.

5 Louis Clayton explained that this is a request for review of the site plan associated with the proposed construction of a 4,585-square-foot single-family residence with a below grade, front- loading garage. The height of the proposed residence is +/- 28-feet 3-inches as measured from the average existing grade to the mean height of the roof. The plans show the HVAC units located on the south side of the residence and screened by a wood frame lattice fence. A backup generator is proposed at the northwest corner of the site and will be screened by a wood fence. Trash will be stored in a 52-square-foot trash enclosure located beneath the front porch adjacent to the garage. The existing impervious coverage on site is 22 percent. The new plans increase the impervious coverage to 46.5 percent, which is below the maximum allowable impervious coverage of 55 percent. The proposed impervious coverage for the required front yard is 43.2 percent which is below the allowable 45 percent. The existing storm water runoff, according to the MSD 15 year, 20 minute calculation, is 0.4 cubic feet per second (CFS). The proposed runoff is 0.48 CFS, which represents an increase in 0.08 CFS. To mitigate the increase in storm water runoff, downspouts from the rear of the home will be piped to a dry well in the rear yard. The two downspouts on the front of the home and the trench drain at the garage will be piped to three pop-up bubblers in the front yard. The Public Works Department has reviewed the site plan and finds all aspects of the storm water plan acceptable. The proposed landscape design features a variety of trees, shrubs, perennials, and ground cover suited for this region. No trees will be removed from the site, and the plan proposes 26-caliper-inches of new trees Dragonlady Holly and Prairie Fire Crabapple. Two existing street trees totaling 46-caliper-inches and an 18-caliper-inch Pin Oak on site may be impacted during construction, and are shown to be protected and preserved per City guidelines. The City’s contracted landscape architect is of the opinion that the proposed trees and landscaping are suitable for the site. The site plan states that all driveways, sidewalks, curbs and gutters are to be installed in accordance with the standards prescribed by the Public Works Department. All connections to public utilities are shown on the plans to be installed in accordance with the standards of the Public Works Department. Exterior lighting is proposed at all doors and the garage. All exterior lights will be 75 watts or below. Louis stated that the proposed home is compatible with surrounding homes in the neighborhood. Storm water will be adequately managed on site, and the landscape plan provides for a variety of new trees, shrubs, and groundcover that is suitable for the area. The height, setbacks, and impervious coverage as proposed are in conformance with the requirements of the R-2 Single Family Dwelling District, and the project meets the criteria for site plan approval and therefore, staff’s recommendation is to approve with the condition that to ensure the future maintenance and operation of the dry well, the applicant shall record the approved site plan with St. Louis County, and submit proof of recording to the City prior to the issuance of a building permit. Louis informed the members that after the agenda packets were distributed staff received a letter from Phyllis Maritz, 135 Linden, indicating her support of the project.

Ms. Strutman introduced Dean Tiber (builder) David Volz (civil engineer) and Rick Corcoran (owner). She indicated that back in January, this house was approved on a different lot (on North Bemiston Avenue) and the owner decided to switch lots and build here. She stated that no trees will be removed; however, 26 caliper inches of new trees will be planted. She added that the driveway will be located between two existing street trees.

Louis Clayton explained that this is a request for consideration of the design and materials associated with the proposed construction of a 4,585-square-foot single-family residence with a below grade, front-loading garage. The height of the proposed residence is +/- 28-feet 3-

7 inches as measured from the average existing grade to the mean height of the roof. The 1.5-story home to the south (135 Linden Avenue) is +/- 1 foot shorter than the proposed home. The 2-story home the north (143 Linden Avenue) is +/- 2 feet shorter than the proposed home. The primary building material is mixed red brick with stucco accents. The proposed roof is clad in architectural asphalt shingles, slate grey in color. Black casement windows are proposed. An exposed aggregate driveway is proposed and will lead to a below grade, front-entry garage. There are no examples of front-entry garages along Linden Avenue; however, they are prevalent throughout Old Town. Brick retaining walls will be located on both sides of the driveway. Two louvered-style garage doors, black in color, are proposed. Louis stated that the project as proposed is in conformance with the requirements of the R-2 Single Family Dwelling District and the Architectural Review Guidelines. Staff is of the opinion that the design is compatible in terms of mass, height, and design with existing nearby structures and recommends approval as proposed.

Ms. Strutman presented a color rendering and material samples including brick, window, cast stone and architectural shingles. She stated that this is basically the same home as was proposed on North Bemiston with the exception that they have added an arch transom above the front door of this one.

Mark Winings made a motion to approve as submitted.

Acting Chairman Liberman mentioned that although there are no other front entry garages in the immediate area, he realizes this is a narrow lot.

Ms. Strutman stated that many lots in the area are 100 foot wide; however, this is a 50-foot wide lot. She noted that also there are some shared driveways down Linden but that’ can’t be done here; currently there is no driveway at all on the lot.

Josh Corson agreed that he’s not crazy about front entry garages, but he understands the issues here.

Being no further questions or comments and hearing none from the audience, Josh Corson seconded the motion made earlier by Mark Winings to approve. The motion was unanimously approved.

CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/SITE PLAN REVIEW/ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW – COMMERCIAL ALTERATION AND PARKING LOT – 6701 CLAYTON ROAD

Aaron Novak representing the owner was in attendance at the meeting. Also in attendance were Peggy Schindler and Sergio Lopez of Qdoba.

Louis Clayton asked that he be allowed to combine the conditional use permit and site plan staff reports as many of the issues overlap. He reminded the members that they do, however, have to be voted on separately.

Louis Clayton asked that he be allowed to combine the conditional use permit and site plan staff reports as many of the issues overlap. He reminded the members that they do, however, have to be voted on separately.

8

Acting Chairman indicated that it would be fine to discuss the two issues together but vote on independently.

Louis Clayton explained that Qdoba Mexican Grill is a chain of fast casual restaurants serving “Fresh Mex” cuisine. The restaurant will measure 3,605 square feet and have 68 seats indoors and 40 seats outdoors. The restaurant will be open Monday through Friday, 10 a.m. to 10 p.m., and weekends, 10 a.m. to 11 p.m. According to the applicant, deliveries to the restaurant will be made at night after regular business hours through the rear service door. Trash will be stored in a dumpster enclosed by a 6-foot tall wood fence at the northwest corner of the parking lot. A row of six-foot tall Canaertii Junipers is proposed between the trash enclosure and the alley. Food delivery service is not proposed. The restaurant does not intend to participate in the recycling program. The applicant plans to submit an application to the Board of Aldermen for a liquor license. The proposed project includes the following:

Original document

This document is too large to preview here. Open the original ↗.