Citation in context

#qbcd71839
minutes 2017-03-06 City meeting records #qbcd71839 Open original ↗

March 6, 2017 — Meeting Minutes

This document is the City Plan Commission/Architectural Review Board minutes for Clayton, Missouri, from the March 6, 2017 meeting. It records attendance, approval of the February 21, 2017 minutes, and discussion and reviews of multiple development projects including a continued review for a new single‑family residence at 1 Tuscany Park, a retail/bank building with rooftop HVAC screening and a 24‑hour ATM vestibule (swipe‑card access), and a mixed‑use rezoning/Planned Unit Development/site plan for 7601–7651 Clayton Road. The excerpts record motions and votes: approval of the retail project per staff recommendation (unanimous), recusal of one member (Scott Wilson) on the mixed‑use project, and a unanimous vote to reschedule the next meeting from March 20 to March 27; other matters noted include outstanding county review requests, added landscaping quantities (64 trees along Clayton Road and 10 along Westwood), and various outstanding design, access, and stormwater issues.
Cited passage
4. All appropriate Plans shall be revised pursuant to St. Louis County’s future

19

Joanne Boulton pointed out that there are certain obligations that a PUD needs to fulfill, which she referred to at the last meeting as well.

Joanne Boulton made a motion to table review of this project. Chairman Lichtenfeld seconded the motion which received the following roll call vote: Ayes: Joanne Boulton and Chairman Lichtenfeld. Nays: Craig Owens, Josh Corson and William Liebermann. Motion failed.

Craig Owens made a motion to recommend approval of the rezoning and Planned Unit Development per staff recommendations. The motion was seconded by Josh Corson and received the following roll call vote: Ayes: Craig Owens, Josh Corson and William Lieberman. Nays: Joanne Boulton and Chairman Lichtenfeld. Motion carries.

The architectural aspects of the project were now up for review.

Susan Istenes explained that revisions to the architectural plans presented on February 21, 2017 have been made and described by the applicant as follows:

18

Mr. Owenell informed the members that they’ve held four neighborhood meetings and this current plan has been in place since mid-December; however, the original plan for the property has not changed since January, 2016. He noted that the updates/revisions to the plans have been based on meetings and comments from City staff as well has with residents of 900 South Hanley and Westwood Drive and these residents asked that Westwood Drive be widened, which they are doing. He noted that the grocery store won’t operate 24 hours a day, runoff will be contained on-site and that the market demands apartments. He noted that this is the fourth review of the project, that they’ve been involved with the City for 17 months now and that the plans have always been public [made available on web-site]. He asked for a positive outcome tonight. Joanne Boulton asked when trucks make deliveries. Mr. Owenell replied “after hours”. He informed the members that they have a lease agreement with an organic grocery store; the store would close at 10 p.m. and deliveries to the store would be made after closing. Susan Istenes commented that conditional use permits govern hours. Mr. Owenell stated that this grocery store will operate the same way Schnuck’s did. Chairman Lichtenfeld stated that to his recollection, the Schnuck’s store/building was smaller. Joanne Boulton reiterated that because the sustainability issue is still unknown and because the County’s issues are still outstanding, she is uncomfortable voting on this project this evening.

Chairman Lichtenfeld stated that to his recollection, the Schnuck’s store/building was smaller. Joanne Boulton reiterated that because the sustainability issue is still unknown and because the County’s issues are still outstanding, she is uncomfortable voting on this project this evening. Joanne Boulton made a motion to table consideration of the rezoning and Planned Unit Development. Mr. Owenell reminded the members of the timing issue and again asked for a vote to recommend approval subject to agreeing to all 4 points; he reiterated that the updated City traffic report will be complete in the next few weeks. He emphasized that they are running out of time. Chairman Lichtenfeld asked if the applicant would have to come back to them (Plan Commission/ARB) for review/approval of revisions if the PUD receives a positive recommendation/approval tonight. Susan Istenes stated that depends on what changes are made. Mr. Owenell commented that if changes are made to the access points, that they will come back; yet he is confident that the current site plan will be approved by the County.

tower similar to the Board’s provided sketch. Art deco detailing inspired by the buildings in the Moorlands’ neighborhood has also been incorporated.

stucco textured panel color.

Original document

This document is too large to preview here. Open the original ↗.