Citation in context
June 6, 2016 — Meeting Minutes
Cited passage
The City’s contracted landscape architect is of the opinion that the proposed trees are suitable for the site. Existing trees that may be
8 impacted are shown to be protected and preserved in accordance with the City’s guidelines. Exterior lights are proposed above the garage and exterior doors and will not exceed 75 watts. Susan stated that the height, setbacks, and impervious coverage as proposed are in conformance with the requirements of the R-2 Single Family Dwelling District and the Clayton Gardens Urban Design District, storm water will be adequately managed on site, and the landscape plan features a variety of plant material that is appropriate for the size of the site and character of the neighborhood. Staff is of the opinion that the project meets the criteria for site plan approval and recommends approval as submitted.
Ms. Strutman explained that they are following existing grades and that the home features a rear entry, tuck-under garage, the AC units are on the north side of the house and that they are fitting the driveway in in-between two street trees. A site plan was shown.
Mr. Volz presented a color rendering/map depicting existing storm water drainage and proposed storm water drainage; noting that there are 2 pop-ups; one in the front yard and one in the rear yard. He stated that the plan results in a decrease of run-off and reduced flow onto neighboring property.
Chairman Lichtenfeld asked if shade trees are being removed or planted.
Ms. Strutman replied “no”.
Hearing no further questions or comments, Josh Corson made a motion to approve the site plan as presented. The motion was seconded by Sherry Eisenberg and unanimously approved by the members.
The architectural aspects of the project were now up for review.
Susan Istenes explained that the home to the south (323 Forsyth) was constructed in 2006 and is +/- 1 foot shorter than the proposed home (as measured from the mid-point of each roof). The home to the north (333 Forsyth) was constructed in 1947 and is +/- 8 feet 4 inches shorter than the proposed home (as measured from the mid-point of each roof). As required by Section 410.385 of the Clayton Gardens Urban Design District, to avoid tall, blocky building forms, new structures shall incorporate a transition in height and scale through one of six possible techniques. According to the applicant, the proposed design increases the side yard setback one foot for every five feet the height of the structure exceeds the height of the adjacent structure at the side yard. The northern side yard setback has been increased an additional 4 feet 6 inches, and the side yard setback on the south side has been increased an additional 10 feet 2 inches. Clayton Gardens has traditionally been dominated by the use of standard size brick in a variety of red tones, although the original brick has been painted in some instances. The primary building material for the proposed home is brick painted white with stone accents. The proposed roof is clad in “charcoal blend” colored architectural asphalt shingles. Black casement windows are proposed. A 9-foot wide exposed aggregate driveway is proposed on the south side of the home that leads to a rear-entry, at-grade attached garage with a tan garage door. A new fence is not proposed at this time. A low Belgard
Volz presented a color rendering map of the existing drainage and the proposed drainage. He noted that there are 3 pop-ups; 2 in the rear.
6
Chairman Lichtenfeld stated that his color renderings/maps are very helpful. He added that they haven’t seen a single-story home here.
Chairman Lichtenfeld solicited additional comments.
None were received.
Chairman Lichtenfeld asked if staff’s recommendation of approval was acceptable.
Ms. Strutman replied “yes”.
Hearing no further questions or comments, Mark Winings made a motion to approve the site plan with staff’s recommendation. The motion was seconded by Pepe Finn and unanimously approved by the members.
The architectural aspects of the project were now up for review.
Susan Istenes explained that the basic massing of the proposed home is articulated on all sides with windows, doors, accent materials, and variations in roof forms. The home to the south (645 Langton) was constructed in 1951 and is +/- 7 feet 5 inches shorter than the proposed home (as measured from the mid-point of each roof). The home to the north (633 Langton) was constructed in 1949 and is +/- 6 feet 6 inches shorter than the proposed home (as measured from the mid-point of each roof). As required by Section 410.385 of the Clayshire Subdivision Urban Design District, to avoid tall, blocky building forms, new structures shall incorporate a transition in height and scale through one of six possible techniques. According to the applicant, the proposed design increases the side yard setback one foot for every five feet the height of the structure exceeds the height of the adjacent structure at the side yard. The southern side yard setback has been increased an additional 1 feet 6 inches, and the northern side yard setback has been increased an additional 2 feet 6 inches. Clayshire Subdivision has traditionally been dominated by the use of standard size brick in a variety of red tones, although the original brick has been painted in some instances. The primary building material for the proposed home is light tan brick with stone accents. The proposed roof is clad in slate grey colored architectural asphalt shingles. White casement and double-hung windows are proposed. A 9.5-foot wide exposed aggregate driveway is proposed on the east side of the home that leads to a rear-entry, at-grade attached garage with a white garage door. No new fencing or retailing walls are proposed at this time. Susan noted that the project as proposed is in conformance with the requirements of the R-2 Single Family Dwelling District and the Clayshire Subdivision Urban Design District, that staff is of the opinion that the design is compatible in terms of mass, height, and design with existing nearby homes and recommends approval as submitted.
Ms. Strutman presented a color rendering of the proposed home to the members. Material samples were also presented.
Strutman presented a color rendering of the proposed home to the members. Material samples were also presented.
7 Chairman Lichtenfeld asked if the driveway is on the north side.
Ms. Strutman replied “yes”. She noted that the home is a traditional style home with a slate colored roof and white windows. A context elevation drawing was presented.
Chairman Lichtenfeld stated that the home fits very well in the area.
Josh Corson agreed and added that it blends well with the 2-story next door as well.
Hearing no further questions or comments, Josh Corson made a motion to approve as submitted. The motion was seconded by Pepe Finn and unanimously approved by the Board.
Chairman Lichtenfeld welcomed the owners to the neighborhood.
SITE PLAN REVIEW/ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW – NEW CONSTRUCTION – SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE – 327 NORTH FORSYTH BOULEVARD
Note: Pepe Finn left the meeting (6:25 p.m.).
Lauren Strutman, project architect and David Volz, project civil engineer, were in attendance at the meeting. Also in attendance was Scott Mehlman, developer.
Susan Istenes explained that the proposed project consists of the demolition of an existing one- story home and the construction of a 2-story, 4,058-square-foot (excluding the basement) single- family residence with an attached, rear-entry, at-grade garage. The height of the proposed residence is 29 feet 10 5/8 inches as measured from the average existing grade to the mean height of the roof. The plans show the HVAC units located at the north side of the home and screened by a wood fence. Trash will be stored in a 40-square-foot trash enclosure located adjacent to the driveway and will also be screened by a wood fence and gate. The Clayton Gardens Urban Design District limits impervious coverage to 40 percent of the total lot area and allows an increase in impervious coverage based on the garage placement. For this project, the allowable impervious coverage may be increased to 55 percent for the inclusion of an attached, at-grade, rear-loading garage. The existing impervious coverage on site is 55.5 percent. The new plans decrease the impervious coverage to 51 percent, which is below the maximum allowable impervious coverage of 55 percent. The existing storm water runoff, according to the MSD 15 year, 20 minute calculation, is 0.5 cubic feet per second (CFS). The proposed runoff is 0.49 CFS, which represents a decrease in 0.01 CFS; therefore, storm water mitigation is not required. All downspouts will be piped to two pop up bubblers in the front and rear yards. The Public Works Department finds the storm water plan acceptable. The proposed landscape design features a variety of plant material that is appropriate for the size of the site and character of the neighborhood. The landscape plan shows the removal of 3 caliper inches of deciduous trees which require replacement, and proposes 11.5 caliper inches of new deciduous and broadleaf evergreen trees. The City’s contracted landscape architect is of the opinion that the proposed trees are suitable for the site. Existing trees that may be
A new fence is not proposed at this time. A low Belgard
9 Celtic retaining wall is proposed along the south side of the driveway. Susan concluded by stating that the project as proposed is in conformance with the requirements of the R-2 Single Family Dwelling District and the Clayton Gardens Urban Design District. Staff is of the opinion that the design is compatible in terms of mass, height, and design with existing nearby homes and recommends approval as submitted.
A color rendering and material samples were presented.
Chairman Lichtenfeld asked if there is a buyer for the property.
Scott Mehlman replied “not as of now”.
Chairman Lichtenfeld commented that it fits in very good to the changing area; he noted the abundance of windows.
Ms. Strutman stated that they don’t like blank walls if possible.
Hearing no further questions or comments, Mark Winings made a motion to approve as submitted. The motion was seconded by Josh Corson and unanimously approved by the Board.
Chairman Lichtenfeld asked when the plan to begin construction.
Ms. Strutman replied “this summer”.
CONCEPTUAL PRESENTATION – CENTENE CLAYTON CAMPUS – 101- 105 CARONDELET PLAZA, 7440-7528, 7600-7606, 7630-7642 FORSYTH BOULEVARD, 14-20 SOUTH HANLEY ROAD, 10 SOUTH LYLE AVENUE
Bob Clark, construction manager (Clayco) was in attendance at the meeting. Also in attendance representing Centene were Bill Richmuth, Chris Reutershan (Cushman & Wakefield; project manager), Gyo Obata (HOK; lead architect), and Larry Chapman.
Susan Istenes stated that the subject properties are located east of Hanley Road and South of Forsyth Boulevard and total 6.5 acres. 7440 Forsyth Boulevard is located in University City. All properties are vacant with the exception of 7600-7606 Forsyth Boulevard which is occupied by a 2- story office building. At this time the applicant has not submitted any plans to the City and plans will be presented at the meeting. The application states that the mixed-use project includes office space, a corporate multipurpose training center, a corporate lodging facility, a corporate auditorium, a corporate fitness center, ground level retail, residential housing, and parking structures.
At this time the applicant has not submitted any plans to the City and plans will be presented at the meeting. The application states that the mixed-use project includes office space, a corporate multipurpose training center, a corporate lodging facility, a corporate auditorium, a corporate fitness center, ground level retail, residential housing, and parking structures.
10 Current Zoning
Current Zoning. Subject properties outlined in red.
The following list of development standards is not exhaustive and may be subject to change. Development standards may be modified or waived through the Special Development District (SDD) process.
7454 7510- 7518 Forsyth, 101-105 Carondelet 7520-7528 7634 Forsyth, 10 S Lyle 7600-7606 Forsyth 7630-7642 Forsyth 12-20 S Hanley Base Zoning District HDC C-2 C-2 C-2 C-2 Overlay Zoning District Forsyth TOD (east of Lyle) Forsyth TOD (east of Lyle) Forsyth TOD (west of Lyle) Forsyth TOD (west of Lyle) Clayton Plaza Ground Floor Use Restriction Buildings fronting Forsyth or Hanley must contain first floor retail. Parking lots Buildings fronting Forsyth or Hanley must contain first floor retail. Parking lots Buildings fronting Forsyth or Hanley must contain first floor retail. Parking lots Buildings fronting Forsyth or Hanley must contain first floor retail. Parking lots None