Citation in context
December 18, 2017 — Meeting Minutes
Cited passage
The minutes were approved, after having been previously distributed to each member. ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW – FRONT YARD WALL – SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE – 7749 MARYLAND AVENUE
Robert Effinger, contractor, was in attendance at the meeting.
2 Susan Istenes explained that the project consists of the removal and replacement of an existing railroad tie retaining wall with a versa-lok mosaic block wall. The retaining wall is located along the western property line, along North Bemiston Avenue. The proposed wall will be the same height and location as the existing wall. Section 405.1900 of the Zoning Regulations requires that all walls located in the front yard in single-family zoning districts be approved by the Architectural Review Board prior to installation. The proposed design and materials of the new wall are consistent with the Architectural Review Board Guidelines. The modular block wall includes three different block sizes, color variation and tumbled edges. The location of the wall is parallel to the public sidewalk. The applicant is proposing an approximately 2 feet wide Liriope groundcover strip between the wall and the sidewalk. The wall will range in height with the tallest point being approximately 2.5 feet above grade. Staff is of the opinion that the proposed wall will be an upgrade to the existing conditions and will not negatively impact the public right-of-way and therefore, recommends approval as proposed.
Mr. Effinger indicated that the project is pretty straightforward and believes the new wall will be a vast improvement.
Chairman Lichtenfeld agreed.
Joanne Boulton asked about the fence.
Mr. Effinger stated the fence will remain.
Hearing no further questions or comments and hearing nothing from the audience, Ron Reim made a motion to approve as submitted. The motion was seconded by Scott Wilson and unanimously approved by the Board.
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW – ANTENNA INSTALLATION – 12 NORTH CENTRAL AVENUE
Joe Marcus, representing ExTeNet (owner of pole), was in attendance at the meeting.
Susan Istenes explained that the 2,800 square foot site is located on the east side of North Central Avenue between Forsyth Boulevard and Maryland Avenue and contains a two story commercial building. The proposed project consists of the installation of a new light pole near the rear of the building with an antenna mounted at the top of the pole at approximately 41.5 feet above grade. The proposed location of the new antenna is adjacent to an alleyway and mostly screened from the public sidewalk by the existing building. The height of the existing building is approximately 30 feet, so the proposed antenna will extend 11.5 feet above the roofline of the building. Based on the location of the proposed pole and the public sidewalk, the existing building will screen the antenna from view of pedestrians. The antenna will be visible from adjacent taller buildings; however, the pole appears similar to a typical metal light pole. Staff is of the opinion that the proposed antenna
MINUTES
CITY PLAN COMMISSION/ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD
DECEMBER 18, 2017
CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
The City Plan Commission/Architectural Review Board of the City of Clayton, Missouri, met on the above date at 5:30 p.m. Upon roll call, the following responded:
Present: Steve Lichtenfeld, Chairman Craig Owens, City Manager Joanne Boulton, Aldermanic Representative Ron Reim Brian Maguire Scott Wilson
Absent: William Liebermann
Also in Attendance: Kevin O’Keefe, City Attorney & Stephanie Karr, Acting City Attorney Susan M. Istenes, AICP, Planning Director Anna Krane, Planner
Chairman Lichtenfeld welcomed everyone to the meeting and asked that all cell phones be turned off and that conversations take place outside the meeting room.
MINUTES
The minutes of the November 20th meeting were presented for approval. The minutes were approved, after having been previously distributed to each member.
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW – FRONT YARD WALL – SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE – 7749 MARYLAND AVENUE
Robert Effinger, contractor, was in attendance at the meeting.
The antenna will be visible from adjacent taller buildings; however, the pole appears similar to a typical metal light pole. Staff is of the opinion that the proposed antenna
3 and light pole is compatible with the alleyway conditions and will not negatively impact the neighborhood character and recommends approval as submitted.
Mr. Marcus stated the pole/equipment will be at the alley in the parking lot behind The Diamond Shop. He stated that the 16 X 26 antenna will be on top of the 38.5-foot tall pole, which includes a light at 34 feet.
Chairman Lichtenfeld asked if the pole is new.
Mr. Marcus replied “yes”.
Scott Wilson asked about the pole cover.
Mr. Marcus stated it is galvanized.
Hearing no further questions or comments and hearing nothing from the audience, Ron Reim made a motion to approve as submitted. The motion was seconded by Scott Wilson and unanimously approved by the Board.
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW – EXTERIOR ALTERATION – SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE – 7620 MARYLAND AVENUE
Paul Doerner, project architect, was in attendance at the meeting.
Susan Istenes explained that this is a request for review of the design and materials associated with proposed alterations to the existing façade, a new front walkway framed with two pillars, the construction of a covered front porch with a Juliet-balcony and a shrub wall; the proposed alterations will impact all four elevations of the existing home. The proposed façade alterations include painting all sides of the building grey, adding black shutters to the front elevation windows and adding black iron planter boxes below the front elevation windows. The new walkway and porch are constructed of concrete stamped with a brick pattern. The proposed covered front porch is constructed of iron columns and a black metal roof. The Juliet-balcony features a black iron railing, matching the proposed planter boxes, and a black metal roof. Two brick pillars with coach lights are proposed framing the new walkway with a shrub wall extending east and west from the pillars. The existing home has a primary building material of red brick with secondary materials of stone and tan stucco. The home features tan casement windows and grey/black roof shingles. Painting the entire façade grey will simplify the appearance of the existing structure and blend the different façade materials. The block features homes with various primary building materials including red brick, painted brick, stone and siding. Staff is of the opinion that the proposed façade painting is compatible with the existing neighborhood character. Window shutters are a common accent piece on the existing homes in the neighborhood. The addition of black shutters and planter boxes will add traditional architectural elements to the house. A new concrete walkway with a stamped brick pattern is proposed in the front yard connecting the porch to the
The addition of black shutters and planter boxes will add traditional architectural elements to the house. A new concrete walkway with a stamped brick pattern is proposed in the front yard connecting the porch to the
4 sidewalk. Stamped concrete is a preferred paving material and the proposed brick pattern is consistent with the house. Staff is of the opinion that the proposed shutters, planter boxes and walkway are compatible with the neighborhood character. The new front porch will extend approximately 5 feet from the front wall of the home, as allowed by the zoning code. The proposed porch will accentuate the existing front entrance. The design and materials will add character and depth along the front elevation. Front porches and covered entrances are common along the block. The proposed porch with a second story balcony is unique, while still being compatible with surrounding properties. A new shrub wall is proposed to enclose the front entryway. The wall will be approximately 26 inches tall with 2.5 feet tall brick columns on either side of the front walkway. Coach lights are proposed on top of the columns. Brick is a preferred front yard wall material per the Architectural Review Guidelines. Staff is of the opinion that the proposed design and materials of the wall and pillars are compatible with the house and neighborhood character. The proposed changes will increase impervious coverage on the lot. In the R-2 Zoning District, maximum impervious coverage in the front yard is 45 percent and maximum total lot coverage is 55 percent. The proposed project will increase front yard impervious coverage to approximately 26.4 percent and total lot coverage to 44.2 percent, which is below the maximum allowed. The existing tree located in the center of the front elevation will be removed as part of the project. The tree contributes a large canopy to the front yard and neighborhood. It is recommended that a new front yard tree is planted to replace the lost canopy coverage on site. Director Istenes continued by stating that the project as proposed is in conformance with the requirements of the R-2 Single Family Dwelling District and the Architectural Review Guidelines. Staff is of the opinion that the design and materials of the alteration are compatible with the neighborhood and recommends approval with the condition that the applicant plant a tree of the same or similar species to the tree being removed.
Mr. Doerner presented a photo of the existing house and a color rendering, after proposed renovations are implemented. He stated that the owners are trying to update and improve the home’s appearance, especially because the addition is different than the original house. He noted that the addition of a porch and walkway will help identify the entryway. He informed the members that the owner’s would prefer not to plan a new tree so they would like to retain the existing tree and simply have it trimmed.
Chairman Lichtenfeld stated that the proposed changes are an improvement and will result in the home being more consistent with other homes on the street.
Ron Reim stated that he prefers the existing tree remain and trimming it back is acceptable.
Chairman Lichtenfeld agreed.
Rosemary Hardy, 7603 Maryland Avenue, asked how far the front porch sticks out.
Mr. Doerner stated that it projects just a bit further north than the stone addition.