Citation in context

#q95ba218d
minutes 2015-04-20 City meeting records #q95ba218d Open original ↗

April 20, 2015 — Meeting Minutes

This is the minutes of the City Plan Commission/Architectural Review Board meeting held April 20, 2015. It records attendance, approval of prior meeting minutes with specified corrections, and multiple site plan and architectural review items for new single‑family residences and other developments. The excerpts detail project descriptions (lot addresses, building sizes and heights, impervious coverage percentages, stormwater runoff figures and mitigation measures, tree caliper inches and landscaping recommendations), staff recommendations, and motions/approvals (including a unanimous approval noted for at least one item).
Cited passage
2. To ensure the future maintenance and operation of the pervious pavement, the applicant

Two black metal and glass garage doors are proposed. A 6-foot tall cedar fence is proposed along the northern property

4 line. A cedar fence screen wall and hedge is proposed on the east side of the home. Brick retaining walls ranging between 5 and 11 feet tall are proposed adjacent to the driveway and front staircase. Louis stated that the project as proposed is in conformance with the requirements of the R-2 Single Family Dwelling District and the Architectural Review Guidelines. Staff is of the opinion that the design is compatible in terms of mass, height, and design with existing nearby structures and recommends approval as submitted.

Mr. Ottolino presented color renderings and material samples to the Board, including windows (black with mullions), architectural shingle roof, brick, cast stone and cement board.

Acting Chairman Liberman asked about the windows.

Mr. Ottolino explained the different types of windows and which ones are operable and which ones are fixed.

Acting Chairman Liberman commented that it’s a nice-looking house.

Mark Winings referred to the staff report, noting that it states that the cement board does not exceed 25%. He asked if that is an ordinance.

Louis Clayton stated that the City’s ARB Guidelines limit accent materials to no more than 25% of any elevation.

Mark Winings commented that it seems like more than 25%.

Louis Clayton stated that the applicant provides the calculations and they are verified by staff.

Mark Winings agreed that although it is different, it is a nice-looking house.

Acting Chairman Liberman stated that he wished the rendering was lighter. He asked if there were any comments or questions from the audience.

None were received.

Being no further questions or comments, Craig Owens made a motion to approve as submitted. The motion was seconded by Josh Corson and unanimously approved by the Board.

SITE PLAN REVIEW/ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW – NEW CONSTRUCTION – SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE – 141 LINDEN AVENUE

Lauren Strutman, project architect, was in attendance at the meeting.

shall record the approved site plan with St. Louis County, and submit proof of recording to the City prior to the issuance of a building permit.

shall record the approved site plan with St. Louis County, and submit proof of recording to the City prior to the issuance of a building permit.

3

Acting Chairman Liberman asked Mr. Ottolino if he would comply with staff’s recommendations.

Mr. Ottolino replied “yes”.

Acting Chairman Liberman asked Mr. Ottolino if he had anything to add regarding the proposed site plan.

Mr. Ottolino replied “no”. He asked if there were any questions.

None were received.

Acting Chairman Liberman asked if any of the Commission members or audience had any questions or comments.

None were received.

Being no further questions or comments, Mark Winings made a motion to approve the site plan per staff recommendations. The motion was seconded by Josh Corson and unanimously approved by the members.

The architectural aspects of the project were now up for review.

Louis Clayton explained that this is a request for review of the design and materials associated with the proposed construction of a 3,768-square-foot single-family residence with a below grade, front-loading garage with access from DeMun Avenue. The height of the proposed residence is +/- 22-feet 11-inches as measured from the average existing grade to the mean height of the roof. Properties in Ellenwood are diverse in terms of mass, height, and materials. The basic massing of the proposed home is articulated on all sides with windows, front and rear porches, accent materials, and variations in roof forms. The home to the east (6375 Alexander Drive) is +/- 18 feet taller than the proposed home. The home to the north (350 DeMun Avenue) is +/- 4 feet shorter than the proposed home. While the proposed home is slightly taller than the adjacent home to the north, it is +/- 7 feet shorter than permitted by the Zoning Regulations. The primary building material is brick in brown and light brown colors. Cement board will be used on the second floor, and will not exceed 25 percent of any elevation. The proposed low profile roof is clad in architectural asphalt shingles, weathered wood in color. The windows will be aluminum clad and include a combination of casement, awning-type and fixed units. A new driveway is located off DeMun Avenue and will lead to a below grade, front-entry garage. The driveway will consist of alternating stripes of exposed aggregate and pervious pavers which are each approved materials. Brick retaining walls will be located on both sides of the driveway. Two black metal and glass garage doors are proposed. A 6-foot tall cedar fence is proposed along the northern property

The motion was seconded by Josh Corson and unanimously approved by the Board. SITE PLAN REVIEW/ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW – NEW CONSTRUCTION – SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE – 141 LINDEN AVENUE

Lauren Strutman, project architect, was in attendance at the meeting.

5 Louis Clayton explained that this is a request for review of the site plan associated with the proposed construction of a 4,585-square-foot single-family residence with a below grade, front- loading garage. The height of the proposed residence is +/- 28-feet 3-inches as measured from the average existing grade to the mean height of the roof. The plans show the HVAC units located on the south side of the residence and screened by a wood frame lattice fence. A backup generator is proposed at the northwest corner of the site and will be screened by a wood fence. Trash will be stored in a 52-square-foot trash enclosure located beneath the front porch adjacent to the garage. The existing impervious coverage on site is 22 percent. The new plans increase the impervious coverage to 46.5 percent, which is below the maximum allowable impervious coverage of 55 percent. The proposed impervious coverage for the required front yard is 43.2 percent which is below the allowable 45 percent. The existing storm water runoff, according to the MSD 15 year, 20 minute calculation, is 0.4 cubic feet per second (CFS). The proposed runoff is 0.48 CFS, which represents an increase in 0.08 CFS. To mitigate the increase in storm water runoff, downspouts from the rear of the home will be piped to a dry well in the rear yard. The two downspouts on the front of the home and the trench drain at the garage will be piped to three pop-up bubblers in the front yard. The Public Works Department has reviewed the site plan and finds all aspects of the storm water plan acceptable. The proposed landscape design features a variety of trees, shrubs, perennials, and ground cover suited for this region. No trees will be removed from the site, and the plan proposes 26-caliper-inches of new trees Dragonlady Holly and Prairie Fire Crabapple. Two existing street trees totaling 46-caliper-inches and an 18-caliper-inch Pin Oak on site may be impacted during construction, and are shown to be protected and preserved per City guidelines. The City’s contracted landscape architect is of the opinion that the proposed trees and landscaping are suitable for the site. The site plan states that all driveways, sidewalks, curbs and gutters are to be installed in accordance with the standards prescribed by the Public Works Department. All connections to public utilities are shown on the plans to be installed in accordance with the standards of the Public Works Department. Exterior lighting is proposed at all doors and the garage. All exterior lights will be 75 watts or below. Louis stated that the proposed home is compatible with surrounding homes in the neighborhood. Storm water will be adequately managed on site, and the landscape plan provides for a variety of new trees, shrubs, and groundcover that is suitable for the area. The height, setbacks, and impervious coverage as proposed are in conformance with the requirements of the R-2 Single Family Dwelling District, and the project meets the criteria for site plan approval and therefore, staff’s recommendation is to approve with the condition that to ensure the future maintenance and operation of the dry well, the applicant shall record the approved site plan with St. Louis County, and submit proof of recording to the City prior to the issuance of a building permit. Louis informed the members that after the agenda packets were distributed staff received a letter from Phyllis Maritz, 135 Linden, indicating her support of the project.

Ms. Strutman introduced Dean Tiber (builder) David Volz (civil engineer) and Rick Corcoran (owner). She indicated that back in January, this house was approved on a different lot (on North Bemiston Avenue) and the owner decided to switch lots and build here. She stated that no trees will be removed; however, 26 caliper inches of new trees will be planted. She added that the driveway will be located between two existing street trees.

She stated that no trees will be removed; however, 26 caliper inches of new trees will be planted. She added that the driveway will be located between two existing street trees.

6

Mr. Volz stated that water runs north and that pop up emitters and a drywell is proposed which will result in less water flow. He made note of the generator at the rear of the site that runs to the front pop-up emitters as there is no gravity.

Acting Chairman Liberman asked about the proposed generator.

Mr. Volz indicated that it is natural gas.

Acting Chairman Liberman asked why it’s located so far from the house.

Ms. Strutman stated that it is preferred to be 5-feet from the rear and side property lines.

Acting Chairman Liberman asked if the generator will kick on if the power goes out.

Mr. Volz replied “yes”. He stated there’s a transfer switch inside the house.

Acting Chairman Liberman asked about noise.

Mr. Volz indicated that it’s no louder than an AC unit.

Acting Chairman Liberman asked about the trees on the south side.

Ms. Strutman indicated that those are the neighbor’s trees.

Josh Corson asked why the generator isn’t closer to the house.

Ms. Strutman stated that they want more green space.

Acting Chairman Liberman asked if there were any additional comments or questions from the members or the audience.

None were received.

Being no further questions or comments, Josh Corson made a motion to approve the site plan per staff recommendation. The motion was seconded by Mark Winings and unanimously approved by the members.

The architectural aspects of the project were now up for review.

Louis Clayton explained that this is a request for consideration of the design and materials associated with the proposed construction of a 4,585-square-foot single-family residence with a below grade, front-loading garage. The height of the proposed residence is +/- 28-feet 3-

Original document

This document is too large to preview here. Open the original ↗.