Citation in context

#q85036399
transcript 2023-06-05 Board meeting video Cue 130:11 #q85036399 Watch on YouTube ↗

June 5, 2023 — Meeting Transcript

This transcript is from the Clayton, MO Plan Commission / Architectural Review Board meeting on June 5, 2023. It records roll call, public comment procedures, approval of the May 15, 2023 minutes, and discussion of multiple development items including a single-family demolition/rebuild with site, landscape and stormwater details (runoff figures: 0.81 cubic feet, a 0.12 cubic feet increase; canopy removal 1,694 sq ft; proposed addition 6,250 sq ft; 77.3% native species). It also records discussion of a larger mixed-use rezoning to a Planned Unit Development (PUD), a motion and vote to rezone four parcels to PUD (motion seconded; ayes recorded), and references to submitted traffic and parking studies.
Cited passage · transcript

I live at 172 North Brentwood Boulevard. My main comment is more procedural for the city that if we have a scheduled meeting, I think there should be a cutoff of when new documents are added to the website. I don't really think that you know, maybe that's within 24 hours or one business day or something. But I don't think that you guys should think that residents are checking the website hours before the meeting to view the most recent documents. And I hope that that can be adhered to or something. I mean, is there some sort of minimum amount of time at which documents are kind of finalized to a website before a meeting? So do you expect people to be like checking it the last couple of minutes right before the meeting? The three documents added today were just copies of the staff report, not actually new plan documents. Correct. So I just feel like as a resident that I want to come to a meeting prepared, seeing the most current documents. And so I think there should be some expectation of me not checking this, you know, 30 minutes before the meeting.

Original — meeting video

▶ Jumps to the cited moment 2:10:11