Citation in context

#q82ede494
minutes 2024-12-16 City meeting records #q82ede494 Open original ↗

December 16, 2024 — Meeting Minutes

This document is the minutes of the City Plan Commission/Architectural Review Board meeting held December 16, 2024. It records roll call and attendance, approval of the prior meeting minutes, old-business consideration of site plan and architectural review for a new single-family home at 121 Topton Way (approved with conditions for site plan; architectural review continued for material clarifications), and new-business review of temporary signage at 7710 Forsyth Boulevard (motion to approve carried 5–1). The minutes also summarize a discussion session presentation on stormwater best management practices and note adjournment at 7:16 p.m.
Cited passage
1. To ensure the future maintenance and operation of the dry-well drive, the applicant shall record a

deed restriction noting the location and maintenance requirements of the dry-well system and shall submit proof of the recording prior to issuance of a Building Permit. Eric Vietmeier, Engineer, Linda Clark, Applicant, and Mike Manlin, Owner/Developer, were present on behalf of the project. PC-ARB discussed the item with the project representatives. Bridget McAndrew made a motion to approve with the following conditions:

MINUTES CITY PLAN COMMISSION/ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD December 16, 2024 CITY HALL CHAMBERS/ZOOM MEETING

The City Plan Commission/Architectural Review Board of the City of Clayton, Missouri, met on the above date at 5:30 p.m. at the CITY HALL CHAMBERS/via ZOOM meeting. Upon roll call, the following responded:

PRESENT Steve Lichtenfeld, Chair Bridget McAndrew, Aldermanic Representative Helen DiFate Kami Waldman Jim Arsenault David Gipson, City Manager

ABSENT Bob Denlow

ALSO IN ATTENDANCE Anna Krane, Director of Planning & Development Ryan Helle, Planner Cate Young, Intern

MINUTES Regular meeting of 12/02/2024

Bridget McAndrew made a motion to approve the minutes as submitted. Helen DiFate seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously.

OLD BUSINESS 1. 121 Topton Way – Site Plan Review– New Single-Family (00:00:50) Consideration of a request by Linda Clark, Applicant, on behalf of 121 Topton Way LLC, Owner, for Site Plan Review of a new single-family home.

Ryan Helle provided a summary of the staff report with a recommendation to approve with the following condition.

deed restriction noting the location and maintenance requirements of the dry-well system and shall submit proof of the recording prior to issuance of a Building Permit.

emitters that connect from roof downspouts, and following a soil test by a geotechnical engineer, for a 15-year 20-minute storm event. Helen DiFate seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously.

2. 121 Topton Way – Architectural Review – New Single-Family (00:29:32) Consideration of a request by Linda Clark, Applicant, on behalf of 121 Topton Way LLC, Owner, for review of design and materials for a new single-family home.

Ryan Helle provided a summary of the staff report with a recommendation to approve as submitted. Eric Vietmeier, Engineer, Linda Clark, Applicant, and Mike Manlin, Owner/Developer, were present on behalf of the project. PC-ARB discussed the item with the project representatives. Bridget McAndrew made a motion to continue the application to a future meeting date to allow for material clarifications. Helen DiFate seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously.

NEW BUSINESS 1. 7710 Forsyth Boulevard – Architectural Review – Temporary Signage (00:47:35) Consideration of a request by Jen Chaplin, Applicant, on behalf of Flight Club, Tenant, for review of temporary signage on the subject property.

Ryan Helle provided a summary of the staff report with a recommendation to deny the request. Jen Chaplin, Applicant, was present on behalf of the application. PC-ARB discussed the item with the applicant. Bridget McAndrew made a motion to approve as submitted. Helen DiFate seconded the motion. The motion carried with five votes in favor and one vote opposed.

DISCUSSION SESSION

Original document

This document is too large to preview here. Open the original ↗.