Good evening. Anissa has just gone through the staff report. And if either one of you would like to elaborate any more on it before we open it up for discussion, we'd appreciate it. Sure, Steve, I'll just offer a few additional points. I think Anissa's report very concisely outlines the summary of the discussion that we had with the steering committee. I don't really have anything substantive to add in terms of the content of her comments. I will just say that we definitely appreciated the opportunity to continue to be engaged with the committee. Some of the members whom are also members of this body, we really had two key points of engagement with the committee. We met on site back in September to walk the area identify some of the, um, points of, of either question or concern that had come up, um, in the previous, uh, public hearing process, uh, by, by members of the, um. The planning commission and then, uh, following that, uh, that site walk, which I, I felt, um, I will speak for myself and saying, and I hope the other attendees felt this way as well. It was a very, a very productive, um, very productive exercise to be able to see some of these things in person on site. Following that, we had a follow-up meeting with the committee where we discussed the pros and cons of the proposed changes in detail as Anissa had outlined.