Annisa Kumerow summarized the staff report. Mark Rubin summarized his reasons for the proposed changes to landscaping plan, the removal of landscaping behind the garage and the addition of decking and pergola, and the use of the space.

Rich Lintz questioned landscaping changes and limestone areas and location of fencing. Mark Rubin explained fencing per Architectural Site Plan page 1, noted fence on north is in place now and picks back up on east and runs back into the deck. Rich Lintz questioned proximity of home and view from neighboring property given the lack of landscaping which was removed behind the garage. Noted he agreed with need for updated drainage plans per staff recommendation. Mark Rubin explained location of structures and driveway on neighboring property and landscaping/natural area on neighboring property. Carolyn Gaidis questioned proposed removal of Silver Maple tree and replacement tree and suggested compacted limestone may be messy surface. Also questioned if all pear trees on property were being removed. Mark Rubin noted house is nearly finished and Maple tree has already been removed per previously approved landscape plan. Noted pear trees are shown to be removed on landscape plan. Mark Rubin noted the pear trees have been removed. Chairman Lichtenfeld asked for discussion regarding staff recommendation number 2 about adding additional landscaping to the back of the garage as was originally shown on the landscape plan. All members were satisfied that there was enough growth/landscaping on neighbor’s property to provide an appropriate buffer. Annisa Kumerow repeated the third condition read into the record as a requirement to update drainage maps and mitigate any additional runoff due to the increase in impervious coverage. Hearing no further questions or comments and hearing none from the audience, Carolyn Gaidis made a motion to approve the project striking staff recommendation no 2 and adding the following condition (No. 3) A drainage map update to the draining map submitted previously shall be made and the additional runoff shall be mitigated. Rich Linz Second the motion and the motion was unanimously approved by the Board.

SITE PLAN REVIEW/ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW – NEW CONSTRUCTION – SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE 132 N. BRENTWOOD BOULEVARD. Annisa Kumerow summarized the staff report for the site plan into the record. Doug Leipziger – Engineer, was in attendance Bobby Slavin- Developer, was in attendance Chris Pike, representing Developer, was in attendance Doug Lietziger summarized the project and described how stormwater drainage will be handled on site.

Annisa Kumerow summarized the staff report for the site plan into the record. Doug Leipziger – Engineer, was in attendance Bobby Slavin- Developer, was in attendance Chris Pike, representing Developer, was in attendance Doug Lietziger summarized the project and described how stormwater drainage will be handled on site.

Chairman Lichtenfeld questioned site drainage and asked were water would be directed/piped. Doug Leipziger noted drainage goes to west and southern part comes across front yard towards sidewalk and drainage goes to Storm Sewer on northwest corner of property. Carolyn Gaidis made a recommendation to approve as submitted, Richard Lintz seconded the motion, Motion to approve as submitted passes Unanimously. ARCHITECURAL REVIEW- NEW CONSTRUCTION-SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE 132 N BRENTWOOD BOULEVARD Annisa Kumerow summarized the staff report. Chairman Lichtenfeld commented on the appearance of the house and the use of the mansard roof which he noted was position. Questioned if applicant had materials and color to show the ARB. Bobby Slavin confirmed the driveway and walkway will be aggregate concrete similar to home next door. Chris Pike noted color of trim, hardi board product which will be color called “Cloud” also noted dark grey shingles will be used (architectural shingle). Helen DiFate – sheet A10 questioned light color brick line under the second-floor windows. Chris Pike confirmed it is limestone trim wrapping around side of building and stops at offset. Helen – noted the left and right elevations don’t match. Chris Pike noted the print was in error and the limestone will wrap around both right and left sides of the elevations and confirmed it dead ends at the large bay. Carolyn Gaidis made a motion to approve with staff recommendation noting pavement will be exposed aggregate. Rich Lintz seconded the motion. The motion was approved unanimously. Presentation by H3 Design Studios on Downtown Overlay District Standards study and proposed development standards. Susan Istenes gave a brief introduction to the presentation. Tim Brehihan gave an overview of the study as it was conducted brief summary of planning process, they helped facilitate summary of decision-making process/ planning process over last year or so. Then presented a summary of draft development standards recommendation. Objective is to review the draft development standards and design guidelines. Also noted the boundary on the map, the two existing overlays (core and CBD) have been consolidated into one district with slight expansion of boundaries. Tim Breihan noted that consensus from steering committee was that districts be combined and expand to south. North Central redesigned to be entertainment and the downtowns primary dining and entertainment street; support to remove two travel lanes to provide wider sidewalks; consensus input that standards have to acknowledge market conditions and not push every development into a Planned Unit Development.