Citation in context
November 2, 2015 — Meeting Minutes
Cited passage
11
Acting Chairman Reim commented that it is a handsome design. Being no further questions or comments, Craig Owens made a motion to approve the site plan per staff recommendation. The motion was seconded by Josh Corson and unanimously approved by the members. The architectural aspects of the project were now up for review. Susan Istenes explained that the proposed materials of the new 5,334-square foot home are brown brick and cast stone with a small amount of painted trim will be used as an accent material on the rear and side elevations. The roof is clad in slate colored architectural shingles. Bronze casement windows are proposed. A 10-foot wide exposed aggregate driveway is proposed along the southern property line that leads to a below grade side entry garage. An ornamental black metal driveway gate is proposed behind the building line. Two paneled garage doors, stained wood in color, are proposed. Cast stone retaining walls are proposed in the front yard and will not exceed four feet in height. A six-foot tall brick retaining wall is proposed along the driveway. A six-foot tall black metal fence will enclose the rear yard. Susan stated that staff is of the opinion that the design is compatible in terms of mass, height, and design with existing nearby structures and recommends approval as submitted. Mr. Doerner presented a color rendering to the members. Material samples were also presented (buff brick, window, cast stone, roof). Mr.
The Public Works Department has reviewed the site plan and finds all aspects of the stormwater plan acceptable. The proposed landscape design features a variety of trees, ornamental shrubs and perennials that are appropriate for the size of the site and character of the neighborhood. The landscape plan shows the removal of 72 caliper inches of trees, of which 66 caliper inches require onsite replacement. The landscape plan proposes 122 caliper inches of new deciduous and broadleaf evergreen trees. Three new street trees are also proposed where none currently exist. The City’s contracted landscape architect is of the opinion that the proposed trees are suitable for the site and the existing trees to remain are shown to be protected and preserved per City guidelines. The site plan states that all driveways, sidewalks, curbs and gutters are to be installed in accordance with the standards prescribed by the Public Works Department. Gas and electric lighting is proposed at all doors and the garage. All electric lights will be 75 watts or below. Susan stated that staff recommendation is to approve with the condition that to ensure the future maintenance and operation of the dry well, the applicant shall record the approved site plan with St. Louis County, and submit proof of recording to the City prior to the issuance of a building permit. Mr. Falk stated that they are adding two drywells and that overflow will go to the 12-inch storm sewer. Acting Chairman Reim asked if overflow will be piped directly to the storm sewer. Mr. Falk replied “yes”. Mr.
Falk replied “yes”. Mr. Doerner presented the proposed landscape plan to the members, noting the front yard retaining wall. Acting Chairman Reim asked if there are no trees on the site presently. Mr. Doerner indicated that currently there are only trees on the neighbor’s property.
Material samples were also presented (buff brick, window, cast stone, roof). Mr. Doerner stated that the large lot can accommodate a good size house, which he believes the asymmetrical Mediterranean style is in keeping with the neighborhood. Being no questions or comments, Josh Corson made a motion to approve as submitted. The motion was seconded by Mark Winings and unanimously approved by the Board. Acting Chairman Reim asked when they hope to break ground. Mr. Doerner stated that he wasn’t sure. REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF SITE PLAN & ARCHITECTURAL APPROVALS – CENTRAL PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH – 7700 DAVIS DRIVE
Tyler Stephens, project architect and Tim Page, Central Presbyterian Church’s Executive Administrator, were in attendance at the meeting. Susan Istenes indicated that she was not going to go over details of the project as it has already been approved; this is simply a request for a time extension for the approvals. She noted that the applicant has also submitted a request to the Board of Adjustment for an extension to their variance approvals, which the Board will consider at their November 5, 2015 meeting. She
12 stated that staff recommends a two-year time extension to the site plan and architectural review approvals, to expire on March 7, 2018, pursuant to the following conditions: