Citation in context
November 2, 2015 — Meeting Minutes
Cited passage
The sign will be made of a beige aluminum header and cabinet and will sit on top of a stone base. The sign will include the name and address of the building in black letters, and five black panels with white letters for
2 tenants of the building. The sign will not be illuminated. Susan stated that the proposed sign meets the requirements of the sign ordinance and that staff recommends approval as submitted.
Mr. Christian indicated that staff’s memo is accurate.
Chairman Lichtenfeld solicited questions or comments.
Craig Owens asked if a tree will need to be removed to accommodate this sign.
Mr. Christian indicated that there is the potential that a tree will need to be removed.
Being no further questions or comments, Craig Owens made a motion to approve the sign as requested. The motion was seconded by Josh Corson and unanimously approved by the Board.
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW – AWNING INSTALLATION – COMMERCIAL (RESTAURANT) – 172 CARONDELET PLAZA (PLAZA IN CLAYTON BUILDING)
Ian Rockwell, Manager, and Joseph Sneed, contractor, were in attendance at the meeting.
Josh Corson announced that he is recusing himself and then he left the member table. He did not participate in any discussion or vote with regard to this application.
Mr. Rockwell stated that the awnings they propose provide a sense of intimacy, which is what this restaurant deserves as it is not a retail use. He stated that he was under the impression that they would be approved as there are similar awnings across the street. He then noted that the original louvers were copper; not black.
Mr. Sneed stated that the window coverage as proposed is about 55%, but they are willing to fluctuate. He added that they have a letter of approval from CBRE, property manager, on behalf of the owner.
Chairman Lichtenfeld asked if the lower half of the awing covers the window.
Mr. Sneed stated that the window is above the ceiling and that’s why it starts up so high; the window doesn’t go to the top of the awning.
Chairman Lichtenfeld noted that the drawing shows half the awning covers the window.
Ron Reim asked if there are mechanical louvers above.
Mr. Sneed replied “yes”, adding that they don’t want those visible.
Chairman Lichtenfeld noted that the bottom of the awning is 7-foot, 2-inches above the sidewalk.
MINUTES
CITY PLAN COMMISSION/ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD
NOVEMBER 2, 2015
The City Plan Commission/Architectural Review Board of the City of Clayton, Missouri, met upon the above date at 5:30 p.m. Upon roll call, the following responded:
Present: Chairman Steve Lichtenfeld Mark Winings, Aldermanic Representative Craig Owens, City Manager Ron Reim Josh Corson Sherry Eisenberg
Absent: Pepe Finn
Also Present: Louis Clayton, Planner Susan M. Istenes, AICP, Planning Director
Chairman Lichtenfeld asked that all cell phone ringers be turned off, that conversations take place outside the meeting room and that those who wish to speak approach the podium and to be sure the green light on the microphone is on for property recording of this meeting.
MINUTES
The minutes of the October 19th, 2015 meeting were approved, after having been previously distributed to each member.
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW – GROUND SIGN – COMMERCIAL – 225 SOUTH MERAMEC AVENUE
Mike Christian, sign contractor, was in attendance at the meeting.
Susan Istenes explained that the applicant proposes to install a new one sided, 24-square-foot ground sign in an existing raised landscape bed in front of the building. The sign will be made of a beige aluminum header and cabinet and will sit on top of a stone base. The sign will include the name and address of the building in black letters, and five black panels with white letters for
Sneed replied “yes”, adding that they don’t want those visible. Chairman Lichtenfeld noted that the bottom of the awning is 7-foot, 2-inches above the sidewalk.
3
Mr. Sneed confirmed. He noted that there is a 7-foot door they have to clear.
Chairman Lichtenfeld asked if a drawing depicting the south side of Carondelet Plaza was available.
Louis Clayton replied “no”; adding that The Crescent building signage was approved as a Sign District specifically designed for that building.
Chairman Lichtenfeld asked about the glass.
Mr. Sneed stated that the glass will have a blue tint. He added that the awning framework will be painted to match the color of the awning.
Chairman Lichtenfeld asked if the windows can be seen through by a pedestrian if the lighting is right.
Mr. Sneed replied “yes”.
Chairman Lichtenfeld solicited additional questions or comments.
Mark Winings commented that overall, the look is good; however, he shares staff’s concerns in that the awnings seem heavy and low.
Susan Istenes stated that staff’s main concern is the window coverage.
Mark Winings questioned what staff would find acceptable; what the applicant would need to do to receive a positive staff recommendation.
Chairman Lichtenfeld suggested lining up the awning with the window mullion which is about 8- 10 inches higher and align with the horizontal joint in the stone (it was noted that the fish graphic would move up).
Mr. Sneed stated that he was okay with doing that.
Chairman Lichtenfeld stated it would be a lot better.
Mark Winings commented that the view from the street would be better as well.
Ron Reim asked Chairman Lichtenfeld if he wanted the awnings to line up with the mullion or the stone, as they are not aligned.
Chairman Lichtenfeld replied that he would prefer they line up with the mullions.
Ron Reim asked Chairman Lichtenfeld if he wanted the awnings to line up with the mullion or the stone, as they are not aligned. Chairman Lichtenfeld replied that he would prefer they line up with the mullions.
4 Ron Reim suggested that staff can make the final approval.
Being no further questions or comments, Ron Reim made a motion to approve the awnings with the condition that they all be raised to align with the window mullion per staff review and approval. The motion was seconded by Craig Owens and unanimously approved by the Board.
SITE PLAN /ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW – NEW CONSTRUCTION – ADDITION TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE – 7620 MARYLAND AVENUE
Chris Dalton, homeowner, was in attendance at the meeting. Also in attendance was David Volz, civil engineer.
Susan Istenes explained that the proposed project consists of the construction of two, 2-story additions (totaling 1,770-square-feet) on the front and rear of the home. Because the size of the additions is greater than 50 percent of the existing home, site plan review is required. The height of the home (with the additions) is 27 feet 6 inches as measured from average existing grade to the mid-point of the roof. (The new additions will not exceed the height of the existing home). The existing HVAC unit will be relocated to the south side of the home and will be screened by evergreen plants. Trash will be stored in a new, 36-square-foot trash enclosure located underneath the rear deck. The existing impervious coverage on site is 35.9 percent. The proposed impervious coverage is 40.8 percent which is below the maximum allowable impervious coverage of 55 percent. The existing storm water runoff, according to the MSD 15 year, 20 minute calculation, is 0.5 cubic feet per second (CFS). The proposed runoff is 0.51 CFS, which represents an increase in 0.01 CFS. To mitigate the increase in storm water runoff, the downspouts from the addition will be piped to a dry well in the rear yard. The Public Works Department has reviewed the site plan and finds the storm water plan acceptable. The proposed landscape design features a variety of trees, ornamental shrubs and perennials that are appropriate for the size of the site and character of the neighborhood. The landscape plan shows the removal of five trees totaling 86 caliper inches, of which 30 caliper inches require onsite replacement. The landscape plan proposes 30 caliper inches of new deciduous and broadleaf evergreen trees. The City’s contracted landscape architect is of the opinion that the proposed trees are suitable for the site and the existing trees to remain are shown to be protected and preserved per City guidelines. Exterior lighting is proposed at the exterior doors and garage and will not exceed 75 watts. Staff is of the opinion that the project meets the criteria for site plan approval and recommends approval with the condition that to ensure the future maintenance and operation of the dry well downspouts, the applicant shall record the approved site plan with St. Louis County, and submit proof of recording to the City prior to the issuance of a building permit.
Mr. Dalton stated that he is excited to get this project started and move to Clayton.
Mr. Volz presented the site plan to the members; emphasizing the location of the proposed addition and deck. A drainage map was also presented. Mr. Volz indicated that the flow pattern remains