Citation in context

#q5b2c6c9a
minutes 2020-07-20 City meeting records #q5b2c6c9a Open original ↗

July 20, 2020 — Meeting Minutes

These are the minutes of the City Plan Commission/Architectural Review Board virtual meeting held July 20, 2020. They record attendance, approval of the July 6, 2020 minutes (approved 7-0), discussion of a façade/site design application with staff recommendations to deny and request revisions, board members’ comments requesting softer landscaping and design changes, and a motion to table the item until the August 17, 2020 meeting (motion seconded and the board voted to table 7-0). The meeting adjourned at 19:30.
Cited passage

CITY PLAN COMMISSION/ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD VIRTUAL ZOOM MEETING MONDAY, JULY 20, 2020 17:30 (05:30 PM)

CALL TO ORDER

The meeting was called to order by Chairman Steve Lichtenfeld at 17:30.

ROLL CALL

Chairman Steve Lichtenfeld, City Manager David Gipson, Aldermanic Representative Richard Lintz, Carolyn Gaidis, Robert Denlow, George Hettich, and Helen DiFate answered roll call.

ALSO IN ATTENDANCE

Stephanie Karr, City Attorney Susan M. Istenes, AICP, Planning Director

APPROVAL OF MINUTES

CAROLYN GAIDIS – MOVE TO APPROVE THE MINUTES.

RICHARD LINTZ – SECOND

BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVES JULY 06, 2020, MEETING MINUTES. 7-0

Istenes, AICP, Planning Director

APPROVAL OF MINUTES

CAROLYN GAIDIS – MOVE TO APPROVE THE MINUTES. RICHARD LINTZ – SECOND

BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVES JULY 06, 2020, MEETING MINUTES. 7-0

2 OLD BUSINESS

6329 NORTH ROSEBURY AVENUE – ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD – EXTERIOR ALTERATION

Director Susan M. Istenes summarizes the following staff report: “The subject property is located at 6329 North Rosebury Avenue, on the north side of the street, just east of its intersection with De Mun Avenue. The property is located in the R-5, Medium Density Multiple Family Dwelling district. The proposed project consists of painting the exterior of the 2-story, 6-unit multi-family residence and adding an awning over the front entry door along with replacing the two light sconces with sconces of a similar size.

The existing structure is constructed of brick, red in color, with exposed concrete at the base of the building, approximately three feet in height. There is a concrete walkway which leads to a single step up into a double glass, aluminum framed entry door. The existing windows are white vinyl and the roof has black shingles. The property is surrounded by multiple family dwelling structures which range in height from three to four stories. All are constructed of red brick with a variety of accent materials such as stone banding, stone window and door surrounds, white window trims, white wood accent material, cut stone accents, plinths, etc. This building is one of only two structures on the street that is two stories in height. All the structures located on surrounding properties and the entire street are constructed with red brick; painted brick is not found in this area.

As proposed, all existing red brick surface areas and the concrete base will be painted with BEHR Ultra-Pure White. A white and black striped awning is proposed over the front door. The fabric awning is eight feet four inches in length and three feet in width with a six-inch valance. The awning will project over the front doors by four feet and attach to the structure with black metal rods.

Unlike other structures in this area, this structure does not have any interesting architectural features. It was built in the 1930’s and it lacks the architectural details and stature that many of the buildings on the street have. Painting the brick white will freshen the appearance; the awning addition will add a classic look to the front entry. It will be the only structure on this street with painted brick, however, staff is of the opinion that painting the brick will not take away from anything of interest on the building, because there is a notable lack of interest and historical reference associated with this building. Painted brick is not inherently incompatible with non-painted brick and white is a neutral color. Additionally, white accents are found on buildings throughout the neighborhood.

Staff notes that the shrubs in the front of the property are overgrown and one appears to be in poor condition. The landscaping lacks design and interest. Staff recommends the property owner consider designing a new planting plan for the front yard to enhance the appearance of the property.

STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVE AS SUBMITTED.”

KYLE KRAEMER (KK) – APPLICANT DAN SLAVIN (DS) – APPLICANT

KK – Nothing to add to the staff report.

CAROLYN GAIDIS – MOTION TO APPROVE AS SUBMITTED.

RICHARD LINTZ – SECOND.

CAROLYN GAIDIS – MOTION TO APPROVE AS SUBMITTED. RICHARD LINTZ – SECOND.

3 BOARD UNANIMOUSLY VOTES TO APPROVE AS SUBMITTED. 7-0 NEW BUSINESS

329 BEMISTON AVENUE – ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD – SOLAR

Director Susan M. Istenes summarizes the following staff report: “The subject property is located mid-block on Bemiston Avenue north of the intersection of Bemiston Avenue and Kingsbury Boulevard, on the west side of the street. The property has a zoning designation of R-2 Single Family Dwelling District and is located in the Clayton Gardens Urban Design District. The applicant is proposing to install 14 solar panels on the roof of the existing house, mounted on an Iron Ridge racking system.

Section 405.3880 of the Zoning Regulations outlines requirements for the design and construction of renewable energy systems. For building mounted solar energy systems in residential neighborhoods, the following criteria apply:

Original document

This document is too large to preview here. Open the original ↗.