Citation in context

#q4a01d7e5
minutes 2016-07-05 City meeting records #q4a01d7e5 Open original ↗

July 5, 2016 — Meeting Minutes

This document is the minutes of the City Plan Commission/Architectural Review Board meeting held July 5, 2016. It records agenda items including approval of the June 20, 2016 minutes; a major subdivision plat consolidating lots at 7630–7642 Forsyth Boulevard and 12–20 South Hanley Road (recommended for approval to the Board of Aldermen with staff recommendations); an approval vote (4–2) to accept a front yard brick retaining wall at 120 Linden Avenue; and architectural review actions and conditions for exterior renovations at 226 South Meramec Avenue and other residential projects. The minutes also note discussion points about plan seals/signatures, stormwater review by MSD, setbacks for AC condenser units, and the presentation of a brochure on retaining walls and driveways.
Cited passage
6. Final placement of the previously approved bike rack.

All other aspects of the project remain the same. Director Istenes stated that staff is of the opinion that the proposed amendments are relatively minor, feature high-quality materials, and are consistent with the design and materials of the previously approved plans and that staff recommends approval as proposed.

7

Mr. Bauer referred to the packet material that the members already received. A color rendering depicting the building façade as previously approved and a color rendering depicting the building façade as now proposed were shown. Mr. Bauer asked if there were any questions.

Chairman Lichtenfeld commented that the changes are very minor. He asked if the grill at the garage entrance is down after hours.

Mr. Bauer indicated that it is down all the time.

A discussion regarding the location of the bicycle rack ensued. Mr. Bauer informed the members that its location was coordinated with staff. He noted he can relocate it; however, he needs to work around the pit.

Joanne Boulton commented that there needs to be 3-foot clearance around the rack. She asked if it could be pulled toward the south (toward the Metro garage); as that would be a safer location.

Mr. Bauer asked if it can be closer to the street.

Louis Clayton stated that it can, as long as it complies with the City’s requirements and remains on private property.

Joanne Boulton commented that the planter box may have to be shortened by a foot.

Josh Corson asked what other changes are being requested.

Mr. Bauer stated that they are refining the canopy. He noted it will be a dark bronze.

Hearing no further questions or comments, Pepe Finn made a motion to approve as submitted.

Ron Reim announced that he would like to modify that motion to approve with the condition that the bicycle rack be relocated toward the south and that 3-foot of clearance be provided around the rack; the clearance area cannot include the driveway. The motion was seconded by Josh Corson and unanimously approved by the members.

SITE PLAN REVIEW/ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW – NEW CONSTRUCTION – SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE – 6350 ALAMO AVENUE

Arthur Kotets & Loretta Mullins, owners/developers, were in attendance at the meeting.

Susan Istenes explained that the proposed project consists of the demolition of an existing home and the construction of a two-story, 3,300-square-foot single-family residence and a 483-square- foot detached garage. The proposed HVAC units are located at the rear of the home and screened

and a combination of etched and clear insulated glass in a new aluminum frame.

All other aspects of the project remain the same.

Director Istenes stated that staff is of the opinion that the proposed amendments are relatively minor, feature high-quality materials, and are consistent with the design and materials of the previously approved plans and that staff recommends approval as proposed.

Susan Istenes explained that the proposed project consists of the demolition of an existing home and the construction of a two-story, 3,300-square-foot single-family residence and a 483-square- foot detached garage. The proposed HVAC units are located at the rear of the home and screened

8 by a 6-foot wood privacy fence. Trash will be stored in a 45-square-foot trash enclosure accessible from the rear alley and screened by a wood fence and gate. The existing impervious coverage on site is 36.3 percent. The new plans increase the impervious coverage to 45.8 percent, which is below the maximum allowable impervious coverage of 55 percent. The existing storm water runoff, according to the MSD 15 year, 20 minute calculation, is 0.33 cubic feet per second (CFS). The proposed runoff is 0.35 CFS, which represents an increase in 0.02 CFS. To mitigate the increase in storm water runoff, two storm water infiltration trenches will be installed in the rear yard. Downspouts will be piped to the public storm sewer. The Public Works Department has reviewed and approved the storm water management plan. Exterior lighting is proposed at the front and rear of the home and the detached garage. Exterior lights over 75 watts will be fully shielded. Director Istenes stated that the height, setbacks, and impervious coverage as proposed are in conformance with the requirements of the R-2 Single Family Dwelling District. Storm water will be adequately managed on site, and the landscape plan provides for the preservation of existing trees and new landscaping that is suitable for the site. Staff is of the opinion that the project meets the criteria for site plan approval and recommends approval with the following condition:

applicant shall record the approved site plan with St. Louis County, and submit proof of recording to the City prior to the issuance of a building permit.

Joanne Boulton asked about run-off.

Louis Clayton indicated that MSD has the final approval on the storm water management plan.

Joanne Boulton asked the applicant if this is a spec house.

Mr. Kotets replied “yes”.

Chairman Lichtenfeld indicated that he is surprised that the impervious coverage is under 55%.

Ron Reim noted that the drawings are not signed or sealed.

Louis Clayton informed the members that the full size set is signed and sealed.

Ron Reim asked if Clayton is no longer requiring a 5-foot side yard setback on AC condenser units.

Susan Istenes explained that it is likely that the 5-foot setback won’t be required for replacement units; however, new installations will require the 5-foot setback. She noted this issue is being discussed by staff.

Original document

This document is too large to preview here. Open the original ↗.