Citation in context

#q45e8c6ba
minutes 2026-05-18 City meeting records #q45e8c6ba Open original ↗

May 18, 2026 — Meeting Minutes

This document is the minutes of the City Plan Commission/Architectural Review Board meeting held May 18, 2026. It lists attendance and reports approval of the prior meeting’s minutes, records that no one spoke during Open Forum, and summarizes new-business agenda items including signage review at 950 Francis Place, a residential addition at 221 Brighton Way, and extensions/architectural review for a new single‑family project at 123 North Forsyth Boulevard. Recorded actions include motions to approve the May 4 minutes (unanimous), a motion on 950 Francis Place that did not carry, a continuance and later unanimous continuance action for 221 Brighton Way, and unanimous approval of a three‑month site plan extension with specific stormwater-related conditions and unanimous approval of the architectural review extension for 123 North Forsyth Boulevard; the meeting adjourned at 6:36 p.m.
Cited passage
2. To ensure the future maintenance and operation of the dry-well drive, the applicant

shall record a deed restriction noting the location and maintenance requirements of the dry-well system and shall submit proof of the recording prior to issuance of a Building Permit.

Jim Arsenault seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously. Helen DiFate made a motion to approve a three month extension of Architectural Review as submitted. Jim Arsenault seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously. V. Adjournment The meeting adjourned at 6:36 p.m.

shall record a deed restriction noting the location and maintenance requirements of the dry-well system and shall submit proof of the recording prior to issuance of a Building Permit. • To approve Architectural Review as submitted. Toni Kaufer and Sandy Schomo were present on behalf of the application. The PC-ARB discussed the applications with the project representatives. Helen DiFate made a motion to approve a three month extension of Site Plan Review with the following conditions:

geotechnical engineer. The report must assess the performance of the proposed drywell based on the anticipated impact of a 15-year, 20-minute storm event. Should the results indicate that the proposed drywell is insufficient to accommodate the stormwater runoff generated by this event, the applicant shall be required to upsize the drywell accordingly to ensure adequate performance and compliance with applicable stormwater management standards.

Original document

This document is too large to preview here. Open the original ↗.

Open original ↗ Open full document Report an error →