Citation in context

#q3fd315a7
minutes 2019-12-02 City meeting records #q3fd315a7 Open original ↗

December 2, 2019 — Meeting Minutes

This is the minutes of the City Plan Commission/Architectural Review Board meeting held December 2, 2019. It records roll call and attendees, approval of the November 18, 2019 minutes, board procedural requests, and consideration of agenda items including an Architectural Review item for 8144 Kingsbury Boulevard (approved with two staff recommendations) and a conceptual review for a new hotel at 8125 Forsyth Boulevard. The excerpts include board and public comments on tree protection, materials and design of the hotel, requests for additional studies by Public Works, and several public speakers expressing concerns about the proposed hotel’s scale and character.
Cited passage

CAROLYN GAIDIS – SECOND

BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVES NOVEMBER 18, 2019, MEETING MINUTES. NOTES

8144 KINGSBURY BOULEVARD – ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD – SOLAR – THIS ITEM IS MOVED TO A DIFFERENT AGENDA AT THE REQUEST OF THE APPLICANT.

2 OLD BUSINESS

922 AUDUBON DRIVE – ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW – EXTERIOR ALTERATION/RENOVATION

Director Susan M. Istenes summarizes the following staff report: “The 8,800-square-foot site is located on the east side of Audubon Drive and has a zoning designation of R-2 Single-Family Dwelling District. The property currently contains an attached garage and open porch that will be converted to usable space. The applicant was recently approved to build a new detached garage. On the northern half, which includes the front, side, and rear of the single-family residence, the applicant intends to convert the attached garage and open porch into an enclosed media room.

Currently, the single-family residence has an attached garage and the front of the home has an open porch that has an overhang with brick pillars. With this project, the applicant proposes to match the building materials of the existing single-family residence. The new enclosed space will require new brick, a below grade concrete footing, as well as the replacement and addition of windows. The applicant is also proposing to paint the wood trim and add a glass door on the north side of the structure. The existing garage door will be removed and replaced with a new brick wall.

The project as proposed is in conformance with the requirements of the R-2 Single Family Dwelling District and the Architectural Review Guidelines. Staff is of the opinion that the design and materials of the enclosed media room are compatible with the home.

STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS TO APPROVE AS SUBMITTED.”

PAT JONES (PJ) – ARCHITECT JIM AUBUCHON (JA) – CONTRACTOR

PJ – Staff report was very accurate

CHAIRMAN LICHTENFELD – I think it looks pretty good and will make the home more livable.

CAROLYN GAIDIS – On the north side of the existing garage, there is the a/c unit, is that getting relocated somewhere?

PJ – No, it’s existing as is and they are going to screen it.

CAROLYN GAIDIS – MOTION TO APPROVE AS SUBMITTED.

RICHARD LINTZ – SECOND

BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVES

CITY PLAN COMMISSION/ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD COUNCIL CHAMBERS – CITY HALL MONDAY, DECEMBER 02, 2019 1730 (05:30 PM)

CALL TO ORDER

The meeting was called to order by Chairman Steve Lichtenfeld at 1730.

ROLL CALL

Chairman Steve Lichtenfeld, Interim City Manager Janet Watson, Aldermanic Representative Richard Lintz, Carolyn Gaidis, Robert Denlow, and George Hettich answered roll call.

ALSO IN ATTENDANCE

Stephanie Karr, City Attorney Susan M. Istenes, AIPC, Planning Director Scott Dedert, Planner

CHAIRMAN REQUESTS

Chairman Lichtenfeld asked that all cell phones be turned off and that conversations take place outside the meeting room.

Chairman Lichtenfeld also asks that anyone who speaks please spell out their last name.

APPROVAL OF MINUTES

NOVEMBER 18 MEETING MINUTES, RICHARD LINTZ HAS ONE CORRECTION 227 SOUTH CENTRAL VOTE TO APPROVE NOT TO TABLE AND THE DATE SHOULD BE NOVEMBER 18 AND NOT NOVEMBER 4TH.

RICHARD LINTZ – MOVE TO APPROVE THE MINUTES WITH THE TWO NOTED CORRECTIONS.

CAROLYN GAIDIS – SECOND

BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVES NOVEMBER 18, 2019, MEETING MINUTES.

NOTES

8144 KINGSBURY BOULEVARD – ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD – SOLAR – THIS ITEM IS MOVED TO A DIFFERENT AGENDA AT THE REQUEST OF THE APPLICANT.

CAROLYN GAIDIS – MOTION TO APPROVE AS SUBMITTED. RICHARD LINTZ – SECOND

BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVES

3 NEW BUSINESS

7651 CLAYTON ROAD – ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW – SIGNAGE

Director Susan M. Istenes summarizes the following staff report: “The subject property is located at the north east corner of the intersection of Clayton Road and Hanley Road. The property is zoned PUD and is currently under development with a mixed-use commercial and residential project. The property is surrounded by a 6-foot-high wooden dog-eared picket temporary construction fence. The fence includes several gates providing three separate entrances to the construction site. Construction signage has been placed on the fence totaling approximately 100 square feet, which is the maximum allowable signage for properties with more than 100 feet of street frontage.

In addition to the construction related signage currently present on the construction fence, the applicant would like to place a 50-foot x 100-foot temporary banner sign which wraps the corner of Hanley Road and Clayton Road, for purposes of advertising the residential dwelling units for sale. The applicant indicates the signage will remain in place until May 2022, when the project is scheduled to be completed. The sign will be made of vinyl and the colors have not yet been determined.

The following sign is permitted by the Sign Code:

Newly constructed residential buildings or developments with four (4) or more dwelling units may be permitted a sign not to exceed twelve (12) square feet for a period of six (6) months after the issuance of the first (1st) tenancy permit or until all units are occupied, whichever comes first. Signs in excess of six (6) square feet shall be aesthetically designed and approved by the Architectural Review Board.

Due to the proposed signage being in excess of the maximum allowable size and because the sign will be erected before the building is completed, the applicant is requesting a sign modification.

While the proposed sign is larger than allowed by the Sign Code, the sign is temporary. Because the site is under construction, the appearance of the sign will be mitigated by the appearance of the construction site, construction equipment, and the appearance of the building as it is constructed.

STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS TO APPROVE THE TEMPORARY SIGN AS SUBMITTED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:

WHICHEVER OCCURS FIRST.

Original document

This document is too large to preview here. Open the original ↗.