Josh Corson asked if staff is comfortable with the new proposal. Anna Krane stated that it is still not consistent with other ground signs in the area and that the red and blue colors will still have the same visual impact.

3

Scott Wilson asked if staff wanted a brick or stone sign.

Anna Krane replied “yes”.

Joanne Boulton reiterated that she would like the City’s landscape architect to review the proposal.

Chairman Lichtenfeld agreed.

Me. Behrens agreed to incorporate a brick base. He stated that they would like to receive approval tonight.

Scott Wilson asked if incorporating a brick base would satisfy staff’s concerns.

Susan Istenes stated that a brick base would help, but the sign is still less aesthetically pleasing than other ground signs. She reminded the members that the decision is theirs to make; however, staff likes to see higher quality materials.

Chairman Lichtenfeld asked if brick [on the base] could match the brick on the building.

Mr. Behrens replied “yes”.

Hearing no further questions or comments, Ron Reim made a motion to approve with the conditions that the sign face be constructed of routed aluminum; that the base of the sign be brick to match the building and that staff approve the landscape plan prior to issuance of a sign permit. The motion was seconded by Scott Wilson and received the following vote: Yay: Chairman Lichtenfeld, Craig Owens, Ron Reim, Josh Corson, Scott Wilson. Nays: Joanne Boulton. Motion carries.

ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW – EXTERIOR ALTERATIONS – 12 NORTH CENTRAL AVENUE (THE DIAMOND SHOP)

Steve Anton, project architect, and Jeff Pernikoff, contractor, were in attendance at the meeting.

Susan Istenes explained that for the first story, the applicant proposes painting the existing brick pilasters black and replacing the existing wood paneling with ebony stained, oak-hardwood paneling. The project also includes the addition of black stacked-stone below the display windows. For the upper story, the applicant plans to paint the existing brick a light grey color and paint the existing window trim white. A new wood and glass door is proposed for the main store entrance (southern door) and the existing northern door will be painted. No changes are proposed to the sizes or locations of the existing windows and doors. The project also includes replacing the five existing black awnings on the first floor with three red-canvas awnings. The applicant plans to

The project also includes replacing the five existing black awnings on the first floor with three red-canvas awnings. The applicant plans to

4 replace the existing second floor awnings with new grey-canvas awnings. Signage shown on the plan is for illustration only and is not being considered at this time. The proposed changes will significantly change the building’s appearance. The proposed rendering does not match either the samples of proposed materials or the written descriptions provided by the project contractor. The application did not specify details of the construction materials; however the project contractor provided additional material details upon staff’s request. A revised rendering more accurately depicting the proposed materials was also requested by staff, but was not provided prior to the distribution of this report. Samples of the proposed wood and stacked stone (brought to the meeting) were previously submitted to staff and appear to be quality materials, consistent with other existing applications Downtown. The color schemes and appearances of the façades along this block of North Central vary, but have subtle similarities in window sizes and door placements. The proposed stacked stone is not found along this street; however there are several examples of black accented façades along North Central. Based on the sample materials provided, staff is of the opinion that the proposed colors and materials are compatible with existing structures. As an alternative, staff recommends considering an adjustment of the awning proportions. The existing awnings are below the cornice. The proposed plans include painting the cornice and adding wood trim details between the cornice and display windows. Staff is of the opinion that this proposed architectural detail will enhance the façade; however the proposed awnings will cover this detail work. Adjusting the proposed awnings to a similar location/height to that of the existing awnings would expose the woodwork. The change would also provide an area for a wall mounted sign that would be compatible with other wall mounted signs along North Central Avenue. Director Istenes stated that staff recommends approval with the condition that the applicant adjust the height and scale of the awnings to expose the cornice and architectural detail above the display windows, to be reviewed and approved by staff prior to the issuance of a building permit.

Mr. Anton stated that it would be difficult to install the awnings so as to not cover the cornice and they have to be above the 2nd floor window sill; he stated that he can, however, reduce their height down from 6 feet; raise the bottom up and keep the top where they are.

Chairman Lichtenfeld stated that the existing awning is below the cornice and questioned why the new ones can’t be below the cornice also.

Mr. Anton stated that the cornice will be visible between the awnings and on the ends. He reminded the members that lighting is being added.

Chairman Lichtenfeld stated that he would like to be able to continue to see all of the cornice and other architectural details of the building.

Joanne Boulton agreed.

Josh Corson asked to see the proposed materials.

The proposed location of the mechanical equipment is on the roof of the addition. The

6 equipment will be screened from the north by the existing garage roof line and from the south by the second story of the existing home. The applicant proposes using a fence to screen the equipment from the east and the west, but did not specify the material of the proposed fencing. When asked about the material, the application suggested either wood or vinyl. Director Istenes continued by stating that the project as proposed is in conformance with the requirements of the R- 1 Single Family Dwelling District and the Architectural Review Guidelines, that staff is of the opinion that the design and materials of the addition are compatible with the home and recommends approval as submitted.

Mr. Lang stated the addition will infill between the house and garage.

Joanne Boulton asked if a sample of the fencing material was available.

Mr. Lang replied “no”; he noted that the property currently has a wood stockade fence.

Joanne Boulton commented that wood stockade sounds terrible.

Ron Reim commented that he’s not sure it will be able to be seen.

Joanne Boulton asked if the window (viewed from the front) can contain a lintel to match the other windows.

Mr. Lang replied “yes”.

A brief discussion regarding the screening of the HVAC units ensued; noting that the screening needs to be located between 18-24-inches from the units and the need for a 4-inch gap below. A discussion regarding the visibility of the screening also ensued. A mutual decision was made to allow staff to approve the material.

Hearing no further questions or comments, Ron Reim made a motion to approve the project with the condition that the screening material be approved by staff and that lintels be added to the front facing window of the addition. The motion was seconded by Josh Corson and unanimously approved by the Board.

SITE PLAN REVIEW/ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW – NEW CONSTRUCTION – SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE – 336 NORTH FORSYTH BOULEVARD

Mike Boerding, civil engineer and Barry Glantz, project architect, were in attendance at the meeting.

Susan Istenes explained that the proposed project consists of the construction of a 4,125-square- foot single-family residence with a 240-square-foot detached garage. The height of the proposed residence is 29 feet 11.94 inches as measured from the average existing grade to the mean height of

Susan Istenes explained that the proposed project consists of the construction of a 4,125-square- foot single-family residence with a 240-square-foot detached garage. The height of the proposed residence is 29 feet 11.94 inches as measured from the average existing grade to the mean height of

7 the roof. The plans show the HVAC units located just behind the southeast corner of the house with a fence providing screening to the south and landscaping providing screening to the east and the north. A 6-foot tall sight-proof fence is also proposed along the north, east and south property lines, which will provide additional screening from adjacent properties. Trash will be stored in a 31-square-foot trash enclosure located south of the detached garage with paved access provided off of the driveway. The trash enclosure will be screened by a wood fence and the detached garage. The Clayton Gardens Urban Design District limits impervious coverage to 40 percent of the total lot area and allows an increase in impervious coverage based on the garage placement. For this project, the allowable impervious coverage may be increased to 55 percent for the inclusion of an at-grade, detached garage. The existing impervious coverage on site is 40.9 percent. The new plans increase the impervious coverage to 54.7 percent. The existing storm water runoff, according to the MSD 20 year, 20 minute storm calculation is 0.35 cubic feet per second (CFS). The proposed runoff is 0.39 CFS, which represents a 0.04 CFS increase. All downspouts and the sump-pump discharge will be piped to the proposed infiltration trench in the rear yard. The Public Works Department finds the storm water plan acceptable. There are 4,409-square-feet of existing canopy coverage on site in addition to one street tree. The landscape plan provides 2,750-square-feet of canopy coverage with 44.4 percent native trees. The design meets the native tree requirement, but has a deficit of 10-square-feet of canopy coverage. The canopy coverage deficit can be addressed with the addition of another tree or payment to the City of Clayton Forestry Fund. The City’s contracted landscape architect is of the opinion that the proposed trees are suitable for the site. The Landscape Plan and the Tree Protection Plan need some additional revisions, including verifying the edge of concrete work in relation to trees, shifting the concrete washout station away from the critical root zone of a tree and substituting plants based on the size or species comments. The City’s contracted landscape architect is of the opinion that outstanding comments can be reviewed for compliance when building permits are applied for. Exterior lighting is proposed at all exterior doors and at the garage. All exterior lights will be 75 watts or less. The height, setbacks and impervious coverage as proposed are in conformance with the requirements of the R-2 Single Family Dwelling District and the Clayton Gardens Urban Design District. Storm water will be adequately managed on site and the landscape plan features plantings that are appropriate for the size of the site and character of the neighborhood. Staff is of the opinion that the project meets the criteria for site plan approval and recommends approval with the condition that the applicant addresses outstanding Landscape Plan and Tree Preservation Plan comments as outlined in the February 3, 2017 letter prepared by the City’s contracted landscape architect; revised plans are to be reviewed for compliance by staff and the City’s contracted landscape architect prior to the issuance of building permits.

Mr. Boerding informed the members that they have received MSD approval of their plan. He asked if there were any questions.

Chairman Lichtenfeld referred to the steep drop off toward the east; he asked about run-off.

Mr. Boerding indicated that they will be mitigating additional flow with an infiltration trench.