Citation in context

#q3b8866b1
minutes 2025-10-20 City meeting records #q3b8866b1 Open original ↗

October 20, 2025 — Meeting Minutes

This document is the minutes of the City Plan Commission/Architectural Review Board meeting held October 20, 2025. It records attendance, approval of the October 6, 2025 minutes, consideration of architectural review applications for 500 South Hanley Road (Option A approved with final materials to be approved by staff, unanimous), 8015 Forsyth Boulevard (application tabled; temporary window covering allowed for three months, unanimous), and 8182 Maryland Avenue (signage approved with conditions, vote five in favor, one abstention). The minutes also note a conceptual, nonbinding review of a proposed mixed-use project at 111 & 121 South Meramec Avenue and a discussion session on a draft text amendment to commercial zoning regulations; the meeting adjourned at 9:07 p.m.
Cited passage
1. Clayton 2040 - Commercial Zoning Regulations (02:34:18)

A presentation and discussion of a draft text amendment to commercial zoning districts.

Anna Krane and Ryan Helle provided a presentation discussing a draft text amendment of commercial zoning regulations. PC-ARB discussed the text amendment. Public comments were heard.

ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 9:07 p.m.

or shall remove the signage area.

allocate that signage to another location. Susan Buse seconded the motion. The motion carried with five votes in favor and one abstained.

3. 111 & 121 South Meramec Avenue - Conceptual Review – New Mixed-Use (01:05:32) Consideration of a request by Michael Knight of Revive Capital Development, Applicant, for conceptual review of a proposed mixed-use residential and commercial development.

Conceptual review applications are nonbinding, and do not include staff recommendations or motions by the PC-ARB. Ryan Helle provided a summary of the staff report. Michael Knight, Chris Cedargeen, and Ken Baxter were present on behalf of the application. PC-ARB discussed the application and provided feedback to the project representatives.

DISCUSSION SESSION

Original document

This document is too large to preview here. Open the original ↗.

Open original ↗ Open full document Report an error →