Citation in context

#q3b1c6ced
minutes 2015-10-05 City meeting records #q3b1c6ced Open original ↗

October 5, 2015 — Meeting Minutes

This document is the minutes of the City Plan Commission/Architectural Review Board meeting held October 5, 2015. It records agenda items including approval of prior minutes, a conditional use/architectural review for signage and driveway materials at 8020 Forsyth Boulevard (motion to approve with conditions passed 4–2), installation of three rooftop antennas at 150 North Meramec Avenue (unanimously approved with one member recused), site and architectural reviews for residential additions and a detached garage (site plan approved per staff recommendations, architectural aspects considered), and discussion and a unanimous recommendation to the Board of Aldermen for proposed text amendments to the municipal code. The excerpts include votes, motions, recusals, material and design details (e.g., antenna dimensions, garage height 19 ft 11 in), and staff recommendations.
Cited passage
3. That the applicant submit a bond in the amount of $3,120 ($120 per caliper inch) prior to

He explained that they are adding 2 feet of rock below the drywell. Mark Winings asked if the reason they are allowed more coverage is because this is considered a rear loading garage. Susan Istenes replied “yes”. Being no further questions or comments and hearing none from the audience, Ron Reim made a motion to approve the site plan per staff recommendations. The motion was seconded by Craig Owens and unanimously approved by the members. The architectural aspects of the project were now up for consideration.

13 the storm sewer and a pop up bubbler in the rear yard. The Public Works Department finds the storm water plan acceptable. The proposed landscape design features a variety of understory trees, ornamental shrubs and perennials that are appropriate for the size of the site and character of the neighborhood. The landscape plan shows the removal of 22 caliper inches of deciduous trees, 4 of which require replacement, and proposes 125 caliper inches of new deciduous and broadleaf evergreen trees. The City’s contracted landscape architect is of the opinion that the proposed trees are suitable for the site. Three existing street trees are shown to be protected and preserved per City guidelines; however, the location of the tree protection fencing is not accurately shown on the site plan. Gas lights are proposed on the front and rear elevations. Susan stated that the height, setbacks, and impervious coverage as proposed are in conformance with the requirements of the R- 2 Single Family Dwelling District and the Clayton Gardens Urban Design District. Storm water will be adequately managed on site, and the landscape plan features a variety of understory trees, ornamental shrubs and perennials that are appropriate for the size of the site and character of the neighborhood.

Susan stated that the height, setbacks, and impervious coverage as proposed are in conformance with the requirements of the R- 2 Single Family Dwelling District and the Clayton Gardens Urban Design District. Storm water will be adequately managed on site, and the landscape plan features a variety of understory trees, ornamental shrubs and perennials that are appropriate for the size of the site and character of the neighborhood. Staff is of the opinion that the project meets the criteria for site plan approval and recommends approval with the following conditions, to be approved by staff prior to the issuance of a building permit:

1) To ensure the future maintenance and operation of the dry well, the applicant shall record the approved site plan with St. Louis County and submit proof of recording to the City; and

2) That the applicant submit a revised site plan depicting the accurate location of all required tree protection fencing as shown on the landscape plan. Mr. Faulk presented the storm water drainage plan to the members. He explained that the downspouts on the existing home splash on grade; they plan to connect to the storm sewer and to absorb the differential by including a drywell. Ron Reim asked the capacity of the dry well. Mr. Faulk stated that he did not know as the system has its own calculations. He explained that they are adding 2 feet of rock below the drywell. Mark Winings asked if the reason they are allowed more coverage is because this is considered a rear loading garage.

14 Susan Istenes explained that the home to the north (214 Topton Way) was constructed in 1951 and is +/- 9 feet 7 inches shorter than the proposed home (as measured from the mid-point of each roof). The home to the south (206 Topton Way) was constructed in 2005 and is +/- 10 feet 8 inches shorter than the proposed home (as measured from the mid-point of each roof). As required by Section 410.385 of the Clayton Gardens Urban Design District, to avoid tall, blocky building forms, new structures shall incorporate a transition in height and scale through one of six possible techniques. According to the applicant, the following permitted technique is used: “Increasing the side yard setback one foot for every five feet the height of the structure exceeds the height of the adjacent structure at the side yard.” The required side yard setbacks are 7.11 feet and the proposed setbacks are 17.24 on the north side and 17.22 on the south side. The primary building material for the proposed home is linen colored brick with cast stone window and door surrounds. The proposed roof is clad in slate colored architectural shingles. A small amount of metal roofing will be used on the sides of the home and above the garage. White double hung windows are proposed. A 9-foot wide exposed aggregate driveway is proposed on the south side of the home that leads to a rear-entry, below-grade attached garage with a white paneled garage door.

White double hung windows are proposed. A 9-foot wide exposed aggregate driveway is proposed on the south side of the home that leads to a rear-entry, below-grade attached garage with a white paneled garage door. A maximum 7-foot tall brick retaining wall with a 42-inch black iron rail is proposed along the south and east sides of the driveway. The rear yard will be enclosed by a 6-foot tall black metal fence. Susan stated that staff recommends approval as requested. Mr. Doerner presented a color rendering to the members, as well as samples of the proposed window, roof and brick. He stated that the home was inspired by 18th century France and that the owners have a home in Atlanta of similar style. A color swatch of the proposed paint color was shown to the members. Chairman Lichtenfeld commented that the house is elegant. He noted that he only sees one chimney. Mr. Doerner stated the second is way in the back and won’t be seen from the front. Ron Reim, referring to the south elevation, commented that this house is significantly taller than the other homes. Mr. Doerner stated that the garage roof helps with the house’s mass. Chairman Lichtenfeld stated that the quantity, location and details of the windows are all very nice. He asked if the brick paint is off-white. Mr. Doerner replied “yes”. Being no further questions or comments, Pepe Finn made a motion to approve as submitted.

Original document

This document is too large to preview here. Open the original ↗.