She noted the locations of the HVAC units and trash enclosure and noted that the site slopes off quite a bit. She indicated that they are happy to comply with the conditions as recommended by staff.

6

Mr. Volz presented a graph showing the comparison of existing drainage versus new drainage. He noted that the same amount will go to the rear and front, but there will be two pop up bubblers and a drywell. He stated that there is a slight increase (0.02 cfs) in run-off due to an increase in pavement, but that in the end, no more water will be going to the north or to the street.

Chairman Lichtenfeld noted that the AC units are quite far away.

Mr. Volz indicated that their location is due to the deck. He noted, however, there is a screen.

Ron Reim asked if the neighbor to the west could use this driveway to turn around.

Mr. Scott Mehlman stated that the neighbor is here this evening and that they’ve shared a lot of correspondence.

Steve Strum, 8177 Stratford, stated that the driveway is not shared and that he will be increasing the size of his driveway.

Ron Reim asked if he can pull out of his garage okay.

Mr. Strum replied “yes”.

Being no further questions or comments, Ron Reim made a motion to approve per staff recommendations. The motion was seconded by Pepe Finn and unanimously approved by the members.

The architectural aspects of the project were now up for review.

Susan Istenes explained that the home to the west (8177 Stratford Drive) was constructed in 1952 and is +/- 4.5 feet shorter than the proposed home (as measured from the mid-point of each roof). The home to the east (8169 University Drive) was constructed in 1949 and is +/- 6.8 feet shorter than the proposed home (as measured from the mid-point of each roof). As required by Section 410.385 of the Clayton Gardens Urban Design District, to avoid tall, blocky building forms, new structures shall incorporate a transition in height and scale through one of six possible techniques. According to the applicant, the following permitted technique is used: “Increasing the side yard setback one foot for every five feet the height of the structure exceeds the height of the adjacent structure at the side yard.” The required side yard setbacks are 6 feet and the proposed setbacks are 7 feet on the west side and 13 feet on the east side. Clayton Gardens has traditionally been dominated by the use of standard size brick in a variety of red tones, although the original brick has been painted in some instances. The primary building material for the proposed home is brick painted white. The proposed roof is clad in architectural shingles, charcoal blend in color. Black casement windows are proposed. A 9-foot wide exposed aggregate driveway is proposed on the north side of the home that leads to a rear-entry, at-grade attached garage with a black paneled

Black casement windows are proposed. A 9-foot wide exposed aggregate driveway is proposed on the north side of the home that leads to a rear-entry, at-grade attached garage with a black paneled

7 garage door. A maximum 3.4-foot tall brick retaining wall painted white is proposed along the east side of the driveway. Black aluminum railing will be installed on top of a portion of the retaining wall as required by the Building Code. No permanent fences are proposed. Susan stated that the project as proposed is in conformance with the requirements of the R-2 Single Family Dwelling District, the Clayton Gardens Urban Design District, and the Architectural Review Guidelines. Staff is of the opinion that the design is compatible in terms of mass, height, and design with existing nearby homes and recommends approval as submitted.

Ms. Strutman presented a color rendering of the proposed home to the members. She stated that the 2-story, all brick home, is a traditional style, with French doors, second story dormers and a lot of windows. She presented samples of the brick (white), windows, and roof. She indicated that they have provided greater setbacks to help mitigate height.

Chairman Lichtenfeld commented that the house looks really good.

Note: Craig Owens left the meeting (6 p.m.).

Ron Reim agreed that the house looks great. He added that it will seem very tall to the house behind it due to the grade.

Pepe Finn asked what type of fireplace will be on the deck.

Mr. Mehlman indicated that is yet to be determined.

Being no further questions or comments, Josh Corson made a motion to approve as submitted. The motion was seconded by Ron Reim and unanimously approved by the Board.

*******************************************************************************

Pepe Finn commented that the house behind the new house on Stratford is in University City.

Ron Reim asked if property owners in University City receive notice of proposed projects (agendas).

Louis Clayton replied “yes”; adding that the owners of record according to County records are mailed notice to the mailing address on file with the County.

Ron Reim asked about the lack of landscaping on the property on his street.

Louis Clayton stated that he would confer with the inspector and get an update.

Mark Winings informed the members that the Board is considering new fowl regulations and that chicken coops would not require ARB review.