The project also includes replacing the five existing black awnings on the first floor with three red-canvas awnings. The applicant plans to

4 replace the existing second floor awnings with new grey-canvas awnings. Signage shown on the plan is for illustration only and is not being considered at this time. The proposed changes will significantly change the building’s appearance. The proposed rendering does not match either the samples of proposed materials or the written descriptions provided by the project contractor. The application did not specify details of the construction materials; however the project contractor provided additional material details upon staff’s request. A revised rendering more accurately depicting the proposed materials was also requested by staff, but was not provided prior to the distribution of this report. Samples of the proposed wood and stacked stone (brought to the meeting) were previously submitted to staff and appear to be quality materials, consistent with other existing applications Downtown. The color schemes and appearances of the façades along this block of North Central vary, but have subtle similarities in window sizes and door placements. The proposed stacked stone is not found along this street; however there are several examples of black accented façades along North Central. Based on the sample materials provided, staff is of the opinion that the proposed colors and materials are compatible with existing structures. As an alternative, staff recommends considering an adjustment of the awning proportions. The existing awnings are below the cornice. The proposed plans include painting the cornice and adding wood trim details between the cornice and display windows. Staff is of the opinion that this proposed architectural detail will enhance the façade; however the proposed awnings will cover this detail work. Adjusting the proposed awnings to a similar location/height to that of the existing awnings would expose the woodwork. The change would also provide an area for a wall mounted sign that would be compatible with other wall mounted signs along North Central Avenue. Director Istenes stated that staff recommends approval with the condition that the applicant adjust the height and scale of the awnings to expose the cornice and architectural detail above the display windows, to be reviewed and approved by staff prior to the issuance of a building permit.

Mr. Anton stated that it would be difficult to install the awnings so as to not cover the cornice and they have to be above the 2nd floor window sill; he stated that he can, however, reduce their height down from 6 feet; raise the bottom up and keep the top where they are.

Chairman Lichtenfeld stated that the existing awning is below the cornice and questioned why the new ones can’t be below the cornice also.

Mr. Anton stated that the cornice will be visible between the awnings and on the ends. He reminded the members that lighting is being added.

Chairman Lichtenfeld stated that he would like to be able to continue to see all of the cornice and other architectural details of the building.

Joanne Boulton agreed.

Josh Corson asked to see the proposed materials.

Joanne Boulton agreed. Josh Corson asked to see the proposed materials.

5 A sample of the red canvas (for the awnings) and black stain were presented. Mr. Anton stated that the door will be painted black.

Joanne Boulton commented that it looks like too much awning in comparison to the size of the building; it looks disproportionate.

Ron Reim stated that he likes the lighting but that he, too, wants to see all of the cornice.

Chairman Lichtenfeld commented that it would be a shame to cover up the cornice. He stated that the awnings are overpowering.

A brief discussion regarding signage took place.

Susan Istenes indicated that there could be up to 25 square feet of building signage and awnings can contain up to 15% of “signage” on their face/front.

It was decided that the awnings and signage be discussed at a later time.

Hearing no further questions or comments, Ron Reim made a motion to approve the changes to the façade, with the condition that the colors/materials are those presented this evening; the awnings and signs are excluded from this approval. The motion was seconded by Scott Wilson and unanimously approved by the Board.

ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW – ADDITION TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE – 28 SOUTHMOOR

Fred Lang, contractor, was in attendance at the meeting. Also in attendance was Robert Rousch, project architect.

Susan Istenes explained that this is a request for approval for the construction of a 965-square- foot, one-story addition to the rear of the existing home including a family room, kitchen and laundry room renovation. The addition will fill in a gap between the existing 595-square-foot detached garage and house, but will not include any interior connections between the garage and addition. The property also includes a 490-square-foot carport to the north of the garage. The existing home has a primary building material of grey stucco and a secondary material of grey wood siding. The home features white, double-hung casement windows and grey/black slate roof shingles. The proposed addition will incorporate the same design and materials to match the existing home, with the exception of the roof. The proposed roof is a shed roof that slants down from east to west. However, the roof slant will be hidden by a decorative fascia board, so the roof will appear to be flat. Since the addition is being constructed between two existing structures and only a small portion will be visible from the public right-of-way, it is staff’s opinion that the proposed roof is acceptable and will not negatively impact the neighborhood character. The proposed location of the mechanical equipment is on the roof of the addition. The

Susan Istenes explained that the proposed project consists of the construction of a 4,125-square- foot single-family residence with a 240-square-foot detached garage. The height of the proposed residence is 29 feet 11.94 inches as measured from the average existing grade to the mean height of

7 the roof. The plans show the HVAC units located just behind the southeast corner of the house with a fence providing screening to the south and landscaping providing screening to the east and the north. A 6-foot tall sight-proof fence is also proposed along the north, east and south property lines, which will provide additional screening from adjacent properties. Trash will be stored in a 31-square-foot trash enclosure located south of the detached garage with paved access provided off of the driveway. The trash enclosure will be screened by a wood fence and the detached garage. The Clayton Gardens Urban Design District limits impervious coverage to 40 percent of the total lot area and allows an increase in impervious coverage based on the garage placement. For this project, the allowable impervious coverage may be increased to 55 percent for the inclusion of an at-grade, detached garage. The existing impervious coverage on site is 40.9 percent. The new plans increase the impervious coverage to 54.7 percent. The existing storm water runoff, according to the MSD 20 year, 20 minute storm calculation is 0.35 cubic feet per second (CFS). The proposed runoff is 0.39 CFS, which represents a 0.04 CFS increase. All downspouts and the sump-pump discharge will be piped to the proposed infiltration trench in the rear yard. The Public Works Department finds the storm water plan acceptable. There are 4,409-square-feet of existing canopy coverage on site in addition to one street tree. The landscape plan provides 2,750-square-feet of canopy coverage with 44.4 percent native trees. The design meets the native tree requirement, but has a deficit of 10-square-feet of canopy coverage. The canopy coverage deficit can be addressed with the addition of another tree or payment to the City of Clayton Forestry Fund. The City’s contracted landscape architect is of the opinion that the proposed trees are suitable for the site. The Landscape Plan and the Tree Protection Plan need some additional revisions, including verifying the edge of concrete work in relation to trees, shifting the concrete washout station away from the critical root zone of a tree and substituting plants based on the size or species comments. The City’s contracted landscape architect is of the opinion that outstanding comments can be reviewed for compliance when building permits are applied for. Exterior lighting is proposed at all exterior doors and at the garage. All exterior lights will be 75 watts or less. The height, setbacks and impervious coverage as proposed are in conformance with the requirements of the R-2 Single Family Dwelling District and the Clayton Gardens Urban Design District. Storm water will be adequately managed on site and the landscape plan features plantings that are appropriate for the size of the site and character of the neighborhood. Staff is of the opinion that the project meets the criteria for site plan approval and recommends approval with the condition that the applicant addresses outstanding Landscape Plan and Tree Preservation Plan comments as outlined in the February 3, 2017 letter prepared by the City’s contracted landscape architect; revised plans are to be reviewed for compliance by staff and the City’s contracted landscape architect prior to the issuance of building permits.

Mr. Boerding informed the members that they have received MSD approval of their plan. He asked if there were any questions.

Chairman Lichtenfeld referred to the steep drop off toward the east; he asked about run-off.

Mr. Boerding indicated that they will be mitigating additional flow with an infiltration trench.

Mr. Boerding indicated that they will be mitigating additional flow with an infiltration trench.

8 Chairman Lichtenfeld asked if there will be a pop-up emitter.

Mr. Boerding replied “yes”.

Joanne Boulton asked the width of the driveway.

Mr. Boerding replied “just under 10 feet”.

Chairman Lichtenfeld asked the width of the garage door.

Mr. Boerding replied “8 feet”.

Ron Reim commented that it seems challenging.

Joanne Boulton commented that the corner downspout might have a short lifespan due to car backing issues. She asked about the temporary sediment trap.

Mr. Boerding stated that it will only be there during construction. A discussion regarding drainage ensued.

Ben Uchitelle, Clayton resident, questioned the capability of a large vehicle, such as an SUV, accessing the garage.

Mr. Boerding stated that he believes the garage can be accessed without hitting something.

Chairman Lichtenfeld recommended widening the driveway; noting the coverage limitations.

Joanne Boulton commented that it’s a lot of house for the lot size.

Hearing no further questions or comments, Scott Wilson made a motion to approve the site plan per staff recommendations. The motion was seconded by Craig Owens and unanimously approved by the members.

The architectural aspects of the project were now up for review.

Susan Istenes stated the home to the north (340 North Forsyth Boulevard) was constructed in 1949 and is +/- 8.95 feet shorter than the proposed home (as measured from the mid-point of each roof). The existing home to the south (330 North Forsyth Boulevard) was constructed in 1947 and is +/- 9.69 feet shorter than proposed home. As required by Section 410.385 of the Clayton Gardens Urban Design District, to avoid tall, blocky building forms, new structures shall incorporate a transition in height and scale through one of six possible techniques. The applicant has implemented one of the permitted strategies to mitigate the height difference to the south and is requesting Alternative Compliance for mitigating the height difference to the north. According to