Citation in context

#q3094d982
transcript 2021-07-19 Board meeting video Cue 77:28 #q3094d982 Watch on YouTube ↗

July 19, 2021 — Meeting Transcript

This is a transcript of the Clayton Plan Commission/Architectural Review Board meeting held July 19, 2021. It records roll call, election of Steve Lichtenfeld as chair and Carolyn Gaddis as vice chair, approval of minutes from the July 6 meeting, and discussion of specific development items including parking and bicycle rack locations, window/skylight design for condominium units, zoning ordinance edits (creation of a “Northeast downtown overlay” reference and removal of CBD/downtown overlay references), and the project hearing schedule with upcoming public hearings and Board of Aldermen dates. The transcript also notes staff commitments to post an updated staff report and ordinance on the city website.
Cited passage · transcript

On the first page of your staff report, I did put the schedule. Tonight is the July 19th meeting, obviously the first public hearing in front of you. technically, and then I'll have the first public hearing in front of the Board of Aldermen on July 27. So I will pass on your discussion tonight, however far you get, and whatever you think you want to share with them. And then we'll come back with the PC ARB on August 2. And I'm hoping that you will be ready to vote. And you will be voting and making a recommendation to the Board of Aldermen who will then hopefully be ready to vote on August 10. Obviously, if you're not ready with those timelines and need to extend it, we can do that as well. But hopefully, we're on the right track and we have a good schedule here that will accommodate everybody. Okay. Well, the schedule looks fine. We'll see if we get through it. I think having gone through it now, it might be good just to go through it. I don't know if we need to go page by page. I know I have certain items that I've pulled out that I'd like to ask either John or Susan or if anyone else was involved in it. PB Harmon Zuckerman, And Susan. Would it be appropriate just to go like that page by page because I think we know the general overall feel of it having a had it.

Original — meeting video

▶ Jumps to the cited moment 1:17:28