Citation in context

#q29c20cbc
minutes 2018-12-17 City meeting records #q29c20cbc Open original ↗

December 17, 2018 — Meeting Minutes

These are the minutes of the City Plan Commission/Architectural Review Board regular meeting held December 17, 2018. The excerpts record attendance and roll call, approval of the previous meeting’s minutes, staff reports and recommendations for specific applications (including an exterior alteration/renovation at 6450 Cecil Avenue), and motions and votes to approve items as submitted. The Cecil Avenue report describes proposed work (rear garage addition, dormer enlargement, siding and window/door changes, painting, retaining wall, deck), notes zoning context and lot impervious coverage (proposed total 29.3 percent), and records the board’s unanimous approval votes (with named movers and seconders and noted absences).
Cited passage
2. ARTICLE X: Planned Unit Development

__________________________________________________________________________________________

HAVING NO FURTHER BUSINESS BEFORE THE COMMISSION, THE MEETING WAS ADJOURNED AT 1841 (06:41 PM)

_______________________________ Recording Secretary

SERVICES DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 PM ON JANUARY 15, 2019”

JOE FLAIGER (JF) – STOCK AND ASSOCIATES – REPRESENTATIVE EDDIE LOWERY (EL) – REPRESENTS THE APPLICANT

JF – Addresses Board to answer questions and would like to request this be a boundary adjustment and not a minor subdivision plat because the County did not recognize the consolidation. They have their own addresses and are their own tax parcels with their own tax ID.

SUSAN ISTENES (SI) – We have already gone over this with the applicant and in your staff report on the second page, it says they already submitted a boundary adjustment plat and during staff review we found they were separating one lot into two and per our regulations they have to go through the minor subdivision plat process

STEPHANIE KARR (SK) – Give background information on the difference between boundary adjustments and splitting lots. The last record we have are that the lots are consolidate. They are creating separate lots, so they need to do the subdivision plat process.

SI – This is a matter for the Board of Adjustment in order to appeal an administrative decision regarding what the Code requires there is a process that takes time. We can continue this matter if that is the route the applicant wishes to take.

EL – The applicant is fine with continuing with this hearing and the minor subdivision plat process.

CHAIRMAN LICHTENFELD – WE HAVE A STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS

RON REIM – MOTION TO APPROVE WITH STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS

CRAIG OWENS – SECOND

BOARD – UNANIMOUS YAY (MINUS WILLIAM LIEBERMAN)

EL – The applicant is fine with continuing with this hearing and the minor subdivision plat process. CHAIRMAN LICHTENFELD – WE HAVE A STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS

RON REIM – MOTION TO APPROVE WITH STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS

CRAIG OWENS – SECOND

BOARD – UNANIMOUS YAY (MINUS WILLIAM LIEBERMAN)

7

CITY BUSINESS

TITLE IV. LAND USE – CHAPTER 405 EDUCATION DISCUSSION – LED BY BRIAN MAGUIRE

Original document

This document is too large to preview here. Open the original ↗.