proposed plant material on the site plan; however, the second and third recommendations they would like to discuss. He stated that a 40 square feet trash area is too big and would not only be unsightly, but would cover more area and that they want to use a fence like that to be used on top of the retaining wall for the enclosure rather than an unsightly “box”.

Chairman Lichtenfeld commented that they can discuss the trash issue now. He stated that the enclosure needs to be screened on three sides.

Mr. Diggs referred to the west, east and south sides (not the alley side).

Chairman Lichtenfeld noted that this may require the driveway be moved to the east a bit.

Diggs referred to the west, east and south sides (not the alley side). Chairman Lichtenfeld noted that this may require the driveway be moved to the east a bit.

4 Mr. Diggs stated they would consider that.

Chairman Lichtenfeld stated that he would like to see the trash enclosure larger than 15 square feet.

Mr. Diggs indicated that currently, it is 5 x 3; they could expand it to 7 x 3.

Ron Reim stated it should be large enough to accommodate at least one trash can, one recycling container and one yard waste container.

Ms. Schmidt informed the members that everybody has their cans sitting at the alley.

Pepe Finn asked how many receptacles a 40 square foot enclosure is designed to accommodate.

Ron Reim replied “four”; 4 x 10.

A discussion ensued about the size of the enclosure.

Chairman Lichtenfeld stated that Clayton has rear yard pick up which is extremely convenient for the trash collectors. He asked that they consider an enclosure size to accommodate at least 3 cans.

Mr. Diggs agreed.

Mark Winings commented that he doesn’t remember this [enclosure size] ever being an issue in the past.

Chairman Lichtenfeld stated that maybe this property will become a catalyst for other properties.

Craig Owens suggested a solid enclosure large enough to accommodate 4 cans.

Chairman Lichtenfeld asked about the driveway.

Mr. Diggs asked if they come back with an enclosure for 3 cans would that be acceptable or does it need to accommodate 4 cans.

Chairman Lichtenfeld commented that the vote will likely answer that question.

Mr. Diggs indicated that the existing asphalt driveway is in bad shape and that they propose a simple concrete/scored/stained driveway. He noted that there are maintenance issues and concerns using a different material and that cost is an issue as well. He reminded the members that the driveway will be at the back of the house; off the alley where nobody will see.

Pepe Finn commented that it seems eminently practical.

Hearing no questions or comments, Pepe Finn made a motion to approve as requested. The motion was seconded by Craig Owens and unanimously approved by the members (Ron Reim excluded).

6

SITE PLAN REVIEW/ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW – ADDITIONS/ALTERATION TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE – 7419 MARYLAND AVENUE

Chris Marshall, project architect, was in attendance at the meeting.

Susan Istenes explained that the 14,421-square-foot corner lot is located on the northeast corner of Maryland Avenue and Jackson Avenue and has a zoning designation of R-2 Single Family Dwelling District. The existing 2-story home measures 2,627 square feet, and the proposed project consists of the construction of multiple additions to each side of the home and above the existing attached garage totaling 1,114 square feet. A new covered front porch is also proposed as is a new 2-story, 1,265-square-foot detached garage at the northwest corner of the lot that is 19 feet 11 inches tall from average grade to the midpoint of the roof. Subdivision trustee approval has been submitted. New HVAC units are proposed at the southwest corner of the home, and on the east side of the new detached garage. The units will be screened by a 4-foot tall cedar fence. Trash will be stored in a 51-square-foot trash enclosure on the east side of the new detached garage, and will be screened by a 4-foot tall cedar fence and gate. The existing impervious coverage on site is 32.2 percent. The proposed project will increase the impervious coverage amount to 46 percent, which is below the maximum allowable impervious coverage of 55 percent. The existing storm water runoff, according to the MSD 20 year, 20 minute calculation, is 0.810 cubic feet per second (CFS). The proposed runoff is 0.856 CFS, which represents an increase in 0.046 CFS. To mitigate the increase in storm water runoff, downspouts from the detached garage will be piped to two underground infiltration trenches. These are rock-filled trenches with no outlets which store storm water until it is absorbed into the soil. The Public Works Department has reviewed the site plan and finds the storm water plan acceptable. The proposed landscape plan maintains and repurposes a variety of trees, shrubs and perennials that are present throughout the site today. The landscape plan shows the removal of 20 caliper inches of deciduous trees, all of which require replacement, and proposes 24-caliper-inches of new deciduous and broadleaf evergreen trees. An existing 4- caliper-inch Japanese Maple will be transplanted on site but is shown on the plans to be removed. The tree chart should be revised accordingly. The City’s contracted landscape architect is of the opinion that the proposed trees are suitable for the site but has concerns regarding the viability of the 26-caliper-inch Sycamore which will be impacted by new underground utilities, grading, and the new driveway. Therefore, staff recommends the applicant submit a bond in the amount of $3,120 ($120 per caliper inch) prior to building permit issuance, to be refunded only if after an inspection by the City’s contracted landscape architect one year after the occupancy permit has been issued, the tree is found to be in good or fair condition. If the tree is determined to be in poor condition, it is to be replaced, and any replacement less than 26-inches is to be paid into the City’s Forestry fund. Exterior lighting is proposed at the rear patios, attached garage and detached garage, and will not exceed 75 watts. Susan stated that the proposed additions and detached garage are compatible with surrounding homes in the neighborhood. Storm water will be adequately managed on site, and the landscape plan maintains and repurposes the variety of trees, shrubs and perennials that are present throughout the site today. The height, setbacks, and impervious coverage as proposed are in conformance with the requirements of the R-2 Single Family Dwelling

Storm water will be adequately managed on site, and the landscape plan maintains and repurposes the variety of trees, shrubs and perennials that are present throughout the site today. The height, setbacks, and impervious coverage as proposed are in conformance with the requirements of the R-2 Single Family Dwelling

7 District. Staff is of the opinion that the project meets the criteria for site plan approval and recommends approval with the following conditions, to be approved by staff prior to the issuance of a building permit: