Chairman Lichtenfeld informed Mr. Orland that the next meeting is May 1st.

5 Caroline Stegman, 8022 Crescent Drive, voiced her objection to any changes that would result in construction as that will directly impact her and impact the integrity of Davis Place; she noted that the area is nice greenspace now.

Hearing no further questions or comments, Ron Reim made a motion to table this item to provide time to draft a legal agreement. The motion was seconded by Josh Corson and unanimously approved by the members.

CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT /ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW – NEW RESTAURANT – 30 NORTH CENTRAL AVENUE – 30 NORTH (FORMERLY JENNIFER’S PHARMACY)

Brian Ivy, architect, was in attendance at the meeting.

Susan Istenes explained that the space, formerly occupied by Jennifer’s Pharmacy, measures 3,578- square-feet and will provide seating for 93 people. An outdoor dining area is proposed in front of the building with 16 seats. The applicant is also proposing exterior alterations, which will be reviewed by the Architectural Review Board under a separate application. Signage depicted on the elevation drawing will be reviewed by staff at a later date. The applicant describes the intent of the restaurant as “to create a relaxed, intimate setting but still a somewhat social environment for our customers to enjoy good food and drinks.” The restaurant will be open seven days a week, 10:00 a.m. to 1:00 a.m. The casual restaurant will feature a chef created menu with small plates and a bar. A liquor license will be required. Delivery service from the restaurant is not proposed. Deliveries to the restaurant will be made in the morning to the rear of the building. Trash will be stored in existing dumpsters located in the rear of the building. The applicant intends to participate in a recycling program. The property provides five off-street parking spaces, which are proposed for use as employee parking only. The applicant is contracting with Clayton Valet to provide parking service to patrons and is requesting a parking waiver for off-street parking requirements. Because the restaurant is greater than 3,000-square-feet, off-street parking for patrons must be provided at a rate of 3 parking spaces for every 5 seats on a pro-rated percentage for the square footage in excess of 3,000-square-feet. Based on the square footage, 11 parking spaces must be provided. The property does have 5 off-street parking spaces; however, the applicant has proposed to use those spaces for employee parking. The applicant is requesting a parking waiver be approved. The applicant has contracted with Clayton Valet to provide additional parking to patrons. Public street parking is provided along North Central Avenue and multiple public parking lots are located in close proximity to the site. Director Istenes continued by stating that staff is of the opinion that the proposed restaurant meets the requirements contained in the regulations governing conditional uses. The inclusion of a restaurant will add vitality to a vacant space on North Central Avenue. The restaurant space is compatible in size to other restaurants and adequate public parking will be available along the street and through the use of valet parking. The proposed hours of operation and method of deliveries are consistent with other restaurants in this area. Based on the information regarding the operation of the restaurant as provided by the applicant, staff is of the opinion that the proposed restaurant will be compatible with surrounding uses and recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit and the parking waiver as requested (6 spaces) to the Board

The proposed hours of operation and method of deliveries are consistent with other restaurants in this area. Based on the information regarding the operation of the restaurant as provided by the applicant, staff is of the opinion that the proposed restaurant will be compatible with surrounding uses and recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit and the parking waiver as requested (6 spaces) to the Board

6 of Aldermen with the condition that there shall be no outdoor music or speakers to amplify music or similar audio.

Mr. Ivy informed the members that the restaurant owner could not attend this evening.

Chairman Lichtenfeld asked about the parking waiver.

Mr. Ivy mentioned that he believes that the restaurant owner has secured valet parking with Clayton valet.

Susan Istenes indicate that typically, City staff wants to see proof in writing.

Ron Reim asked where the previous occupant parked.

Anna Krane stated that the previous tenant used the lot at the rear of the building.

Josh Corson asked about the staff recommendation regarding not allowing outdoor music and/or speakers.

Mr. Ivy indicated that Wicked Greenz has similar conditions.

Hearing no further questions or comments, Ron Reim made a motion to recommend approval of the Conditional Use Permit to the Board of Aldermen per staff recommendation and with the condition that the applicant secure and maintain parking for 6 vehicles (valet parking agreement acceptable) and proof be submitted to the City. The motion was seconded by Craig Owens and unanimously approved by the members.

The architectural aspects of the project were now up for review.

Susan Istenes explained that the applicant proposes removing the existing storefront window system and black awning. The brick and stone detail work are to remain as is. The proposed façade includes wood paneling with raised molding, corbels, fluted columns and flower boxes. Large storefront windows, double doors and transom windows are also proposed. The new façade treatments will be painted black. Exterior lighting for the building is also proposed. Four gooseneck lights are proposed above the sign panel and one gas lantern is proposed at each end of the façade. Signage shown on the plan is for illustration only and is not being considered at this time. Director Istenes continued by stating that staff recommends approval as requested.

Ron Reim asked if the existing awning is to be removed.

Mr. Ivy replied “yes”.

Five blade signs are proposed along the east elevation, one for each tenant. The blade sign will be constructed of dark bronze metal and will measure 1-foot 6-inches by 1-foot 6-inches or 2.25-

8 square-feet. The storefront ID blade signs will be located adjacent to the retail entrances will not be illuminated. Each sign will have an opaque panel displaying the retailer ID. Six walls signs are proposed along the first floor on the east and north elevations. The signs will be constructed of metal form letters, logos or graphics and will not exceed 2-feet in height by 14-feet in width. Tenant ID signs will be internally illuminated. The sign colors and design are not restricted. Signs will be centered over each retail entry with the northeast corner store tenant having two wall signs. Based on maximum sign area allowed, staff estimates that the potential signage could measure up to 168-square-feet on the east elevation (including building ID sign) and 28-square- feet on the north elevation. Six address signs are proposed along the east elevation above each entrance. The main building address and each tenant address will be displayed above the corresponding entrance. Only address numbers will be displayed. Numbers will be constructed of black vinyl attached to the window. Director Istenes continued by stating that the purpose of forming a signage sub-district is to allow a sign package that fosters creativity and cohesiveness for larger developments. Typically, signage sub-districts are approved for new developments, and over the past 10 years have been approved for Centene, The Crescent and DeMun Pointe. The adoption of a signage sub-district is beneficial to the building owner and the City because it ensures predictability. Without the adoption of a sub-district, each tenant requesting a sign not in accordance with the requirements of the Sign Ordinance would have to seek approval from the Architectural Review Board on a case by case basis. Staff estimates that the proposed signage sub-district would permit the same number, but larger signs than currently permitted under the Sign Ordinance. Under the Sign Ordinance the building would be permitted the following:

in area.