Point Value Admin Erwin Meadows Average Percent Comments 6.1 Exterior windows, doors, and walls are of materials and finishes that require minimum maintenance 10 8 9 10 9.0 90% 6.2 Floor surfaces are appropriate to the space and activity, require minimum care and maintenance, and possess a proper finish 15 15 13 14 14.0 93% Some wear and tear on carpet, nothing inappropriate. 6.3 Ceilings and walls throughout the building including service areas are easily cleaned and repaired 5 5 5 5 5.0 100% 6.4 Built-in classroom equipment is designed and constructed for ease of maintenance 5 5 5 5 5.0 100% Flush and easy to clean counters and cabinetry. 6.5 Kitchen equipment is designed and constructed for ease of maintenance 15 9 12 12 11.0 73% Dishwashers break frequently. 6.6 Mechanical, electrical, and plumbing systems are readily serviceable and easily adapted for future modifications 20 12 16 16 14.7 73% 6.7 Restrooms can be maintained efficiently and are composed of quality finishes 20 16 16 18 16.7 83% Some ceiling panels damaged, can easily be replaced. 6.8 Adequate custodial storage space with water and drainage is accessible throughout the building 5 3 3 4 3.3 67% Could benefit from more custodial storage. 6.9 Adequate electrical outlets to permit routine cleaning are available in all areas 5 4 4 5 4.3 87% Total 100 77 83 89 83.0 83% 146 147 REFERENCES Clayton School District (n.d.) Page 11. Clayton Schools. Available at: https://www.claytonschools.net/page/11 Clayton School District (2018) Boundaries map updated 10/22/18. Clayton Schools. Available at: https://www.claytonschools.net/site/handlers/filedownload. ashx?moduleinstanceid=4439&dataid=7646&FileName=Boundaries_Map_Updated_102218.pdf Denton, et al. (2004) An Appraisal Guide for Older and Historic School Facilities. Phoenix, Arizona: Council of Educational Facility Planners International. Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (n.d.) Missouri Learning Standards. Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. Available at: https://dese.mo.gov/college-career-readiness/curriculum/missouri-learning-standards Hawkins, H. and Lilley, E. (1998) Guide for School Facility Appraisal. 1998 Edition. Phoenix, Arizona: Council of Educational Facility Planners, International.

Available at: https://dese.mo.gov/college-career-readiness/curriculum/missouri-learning-standards Hawkins, H. and Lilley, E. (1998) Guide for School Facility Appraisal. 1998 Edition. Phoenix, Arizona: Council of Educational Facility Planners, International. COST ESTIMATIONS COST ESTIMATIONS 149 As part of our facilitation of the Long-Range Facilities Master Plan, Paragon Architecture provided cost estimations covering all the identified improvements within the district. The construction cost estimates provided were based on needs assessment data and are conceptual in nature based on the conceptual information provided within the assessment data. Cost estimate documentation includes: • Long-term replacement plan for HVAC systems at nine locations. • Document estimates for parking lots and drive maintenance and replacement plans at nine locations. • Document estimates for exterior lighting improvements at nine locations. • Document estimates for exterior building envelope improvements at nine locations. • Document estimates for renovations/addition options at six locations (Clayton High School, Wydown Middle School, Captain Elementary School, Glenridge Elementary School, Meramec Elementary School, Gay Field, and The Family Center). • Document estimates for playground improvements at five locations. • Document estimates for playing field and track improvements at all three elementary schools, the middle school, and the high school. • Document estimates for improvement items individually identified by each school in the district. The goal of these estimates is to be able to holistically look at improvements needed across the district from an immediate, non-immediate, and future need. COST ESTIMATES INTRODUCTION

The goal of these estimates is to be able to holistically look at improvements needed across the district from an immediate, non-immediate, and future need. COST ESTIMATES INTRODUCTION 150 Paragon Architecture completed the construction cost estimates for the School District of Clayton’s 2024 Facilities Masterplan. These design options are only conceptual in nature and will need further development including architectural and engineering design services. It is recommended that the district completes preliminary design or schematic design level documentation on all potential projects prior to developing bond project proposals to the community. The construction cost estimates include the condition assessment data completed by Paragon, along with design options for Level 2 and Level 3 Improvements. The Level 2 and Level 3 Improvements are based on feedback received from the district during the masterplan process from the steering committee meetings, sub-committee meetings, and community forums. Individual Level 1 type projects were not included as separate summary line-item cost estimates as they comprise any combination of annual capital improvement type projects identified in the condition assessment data or individual components of the Level 2 Improvement projects identified at each site. Also, please note the following regarding the cost estimates: • Construction cost estimate details are estimated at current day 2025 construction values based on square foot costs of similar projects in the STL metro area and do not include property acquisition. The Owner shall apply an appropriate amount escalation factor based on the actual anticipated construction start of the scope of work. • High priority items – identified with red in the estimates and defined by Paragon as improvements that should be made within a 2–5-year range and should plan for a 5-10% escalation factor. • Medium priority items – identified with yellow in the estimates and defined by Paragon as improvements that should be made within a 5–10-year range and should plan for a 10-20% escalation factor. • Low priority items – identified with green in the estimates and defined by Paragon as improvements that should be made within a 10–15-year range and should plan for a 20-40% escalation factor. • Other project costs including soft costs such as architectural/engineering design fees, FF&E (furniture, fixtures and equipment), construction management fees, survey, geotechnical, testing and inspection fees, permitting, etc. are not included within these construction cost estimates. For planning purposes, which will be dependent on the actual scope of work, an approximate additional 15-20% cost is recommended to be added to the construction costs. DELIVERABLES OVERVIEW

For planning purposes, which will be dependent on the actual scope of work, an approximate additional 15-20% cost is recommended to be added to the construction costs. DELIVERABLES OVERVIEW 151 The Clayton School District has approximately $23.5 million dollars in immediate needs (2-5 Years), indicated in red, including proposed HVAC, Building Envelope, Roofing, Playgrounds & Playfields, Flooring, Ceilings, Interior Walls, Parking Lot & Drives, Exterior Lighting, and Restroom improvements. Over the next 5-10 years the Clayton School District has approximately $28.3 million dollars in facility maintenance, replacement, and renovation needs. In all, the facility master plan process, identified, prioritized, and documented just over $94 million dollars in facility improvements over the next 10+ years. The pages that follow provide a structured summary of the Long-Range Facility Master Plan findings. First, summary tables present an overview of the High-Level Cost Estimate Totals, organized by location (Clayton High School, Wydown Middle School, Captain Elementary School, Glenridge Elementary School, Meramec Elementary School, Gay Fields & Ancillary Buildings, The Family Center, Administrative Center, and Facility Services) and by Assessment Scope (HVAC, Building Envelope, Roofing, Playgrounds & Playfields, Flooring, Ceilings, Walls, Parking Lots & Drives, and Exterior Lighting). Following these, a summary table outlines the High-Level Cost Estimate Totals for the Proposed Future Development Projects, offering cost estimates that correspond with each location’s Conceptual Design Option(s) that are presented in Volume IV of the Master Plan. After these high-level summaries, more detailed tables break down the cost estimates for each conceptual design option, itemized by location and Assessment Scope. COST ESTIMATES SUMMARY OF RESULTS

After these high-level summaries, more detailed tables break down the cost estimates for each conceptual design option, itemized by location and Assessment Scope. COST ESTIMATES SUMMARY OF RESULTS 
 
ҨҨ
 HIGH LEVEL COST ESTIMATE — OVERVIEW 
ьы҂
эыэѐ    ''*2 - ) '4/*)
$"#
#**' ۅђ҂ёья҂ѐяя ۅью҂эюѓ҂ьђы ۅьѐ҂ёэю҂ђыє ۅюё҂яђё҂яээ 4*2)
$'
#**' ۅь҂ьэє҂яыь ۅю҂эѓю҂ђьё ۅью҂эьы҂ьээ ۅьђ҂ёэю҂эює +/$)
' ( )/-4
#**' ۅю҂эьё҂ыђђ ۅя҂эээ҂ююы ۅь҂єёђ҂єюэ ۅє҂яыё҂юює ' )-$"
' ( )/-4
#**' ۅю҂ьюю҂ѓђь ۅэ҂эѓє҂эюы ۅю҂ээь҂єяэ ۅѓ҂ёяѐ҂ыяэ  -( 
' ( )/-4
#**' ۅя҂ѐээ҂ђєё ۅэ҂яѓю҂юыы ۅя҂ђюя҂юыэ ۅьь҂ђяы҂юєђ /#' /$.
ъ
/$1$/$ . ۅєѓё҂ѓэь ۅёяђ҂ёяє ۅѓёѐ҂ьює ۅэ҂яєє҂ёыє #
($'4
 )/ - ۅэ҂ьыя҂єђѐ ۅѐюю҂юяђ ۅь҂яѓя҂юыѐ ۅя҂ьээ҂ёэѓ ($)$./-/$1
 )/ - ۅѐѐѓ҂ђюѐ ۅь҂ьёђ҂єьє ۅь҂ьёы҂ыђь ۅэ҂ѓѓё҂ђэѐ $'$/4
 -1$ . ۅьєь҂ђыя ۅяює҂юєђ ۅьыѐ҂юђэ ۅђюё҂яђю   
 ۅэю҂яѐѓ҂єэя ۅэѓ҂юыѐ҂ыѐѓ ۅяэ҂юђэ҂ѓєя ۅєя҂ьюё҂ѓђѐ    ''*2 - )  ۅьѓ҂ђѓё҂яєѐ ۅя҂эѐѓ҂ѓыы ۅьэ҂ыѐь҂ыыы ۅюѐ҂ыєё҂эєѐ )1 '*+ ۅь҂ёыь҂яєѓ ۅьэ҂юѐѓ҂ђєђ ۅђёы҂яяє ۅья҂ђэы҂ђяя **!$)" ۅь҂эђы҂ыђы ۅѐ҂яыє҂яяя ۅё҂ыєя҂юэы ۅьэ҂ђђю҂ѓюя '4"-*0).
ъ
'4!$ '. ۅяыю҂ьёё ۅь҂ыѓя҂єёѐ ۅь҂ѐѓы҂ѐьь ۅю҂ыёѓ҂ёяэ '**-$)" ۅэыѓ҂єээ ۅёђѐ҂ёёь ۅѓ҂ђёѐ҂ыыђ ۅє҂ёяє҂ѐєы  $'$)". ۅюыѐ҂ёѓѐ ۅь҂юяё҂эью ۅю҂ёђя҂юђь ۅѐ҂юэё҂эёє ''. ۅююэ҂ѐээ ۅь҂єєѐ҂ђяє ۅѓ҂ыыє҂эѐѓ ۅьы҂ююђ҂ѐэє -&$)"
*/.
ъ
-$1 . ۅьюэ҂єяя ۅѓєь҂ьєђ ۅь҂яюђ҂єђђ ۅэ҂яёэ҂ььѓ 3/ -$*-
$"#/$)" ۅяьђ҂ёээ ۅэѓя҂эюэ ۅы ۅђыь҂ѓѐя   
 ۅэю҂яѐѓ҂єэя ۅэѓ҂юыѐ҂ыѐѓ ۅяэ҂юђэ҂ѓєя ۅєя҂ьюё҂ѓђѐ 
    
     
 


152