Citation in context
September 21, 2015 — Meeting Minutes
Cited passage
He stated that a 1-2 foot tall wall will separate the driveways. Chairman Lichtenfeld asked if the new driveway will be lower than the adjacent driveway.
3
Mr. Volz replied “slightly”. He then showed the members the location of the pop-up bubblers .
Being no further questions or comments, and after verbal notification that the street tree is to remain, Ron Reim made a motion to approve per staff recommendation. The motion was seconded by Josh Corson and unanimously approved by the members.
The architectural aspects of the project were now up for review.
Susan Istenes explained that properties located west of Forsyth Boulevard in Clayton Gardens have traditionally been developed with one-story ranch homes with a strong horizontal orientation. The basic massing of the proposed home is articulated on all sides with windows, doors, accent material, and variations in roof forms. The home to the south (201 Brighton Way) was constructed in 1947 and is +/- 11 feet shorter than the proposed home (as measured from the mid-point of each roof). The home to the north (209 Brighton Way) was constructed in 1960 and is +/- 8 feet shorter than the proposed home (as measured from the mid-point of each roof). As required by Section 410.385 of the Clayton Gardens Urban Design District, to avoid tall, blocky building forms, new structures shall incorporate a transition in height and scale through one of six possible techniques. For this project, the following permitted techniques are used:
MINUTES
CITY PLAN COMMISSION/ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD
SEPTEMBER 21, 2015
The City Plan Commission/Architectural Review Board of the City of Clayton, Missouri, met upon the above date at 5:30 p.m. Upon roll call, the following responded:
Present: Chairman Steve Lichtenfeld Mark Winings, Aldermanic Representative Craig Owens, City Manager Ron Reim Josh Corson Sherry Eisenberg Pepe Finn
Absent: None
Also Present: Louis Clayton, Planner Susan M. Istenes, AICP, Planning Director
Chairman Lichtenfeld asked that all cell phone ringers be turned off, that conversations take place outside the meeting room and that those who wish to speak approach the podium and to be sure the green light on the microphone is on for property recording of this meeting.
MINUTES
The minutes of the September 9th, 2015 meeting were approved, after having been previously distributed to each member.
SITE PLAN REVIEW/ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW – NEW CONSTRUCTION – SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE – 205 BRIGHTON WAY
David Volz, civil engineer and Edward Stevens, project architect, were in attendance at the meeting.
Susan Istenes explained that the proposed project consists of the demolition of an existing one- story home and the construction of a 2,676-square-foot (excluding the basement) single-family
SITE PLAN REVIEW/ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW – NEW CONSTRUCTION – SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE – 205 BRIGHTON WAY
David Volz, civil engineer and Edward Stevens, project architect, were in attendance at the meeting. Susan Istenes explained that the proposed project consists of the demolition of an existing one- story home and the construction of a 2,676-square-foot (excluding the basement) single-family
2 residence with an attached, rear-entry, at-grade garage. The height of the proposed residence is 26 feet 10.5 inches as measured from the average existing grade to the mean height of the roof. The plans show the HVAC units located at the south side of the home and screened by evergreen landscaping. Trash will be stored in a 32-square-foot trash enclosure located at the end of the driveway. The trash enclosure will be screened by a wood fence and gate. The Clayton Gardens Urban Design District limits impervious coverage to 40 percent of the total lot area and allows an increase in impervious coverage based on the garage placement. For this project, the allowable impervious coverage may be increased to 55 percent for the inclusion of an attached, at-grade, rear- loading garage. The existing impervious coverage on site is 53.7 percent. The new plans decrease the impervious coverage to 50.9 percent, which is below the maximum allowable impervious coverage of 55 percent. The existing storm water runoff, according to the MSD 15 year, 20 minute calculation, is 0.57 cubic feet per second (CFS). The proposed runoff is 0.56 CFS, which represents a decrease in 0.01 CFS, therefore, storm water mitigation is not required. All downspouts will be piped to two pop-up bubblers in the rear yard and one in the front yard. The Public Works Department finds the storm water plan acceptable. The proposed landscape design features a variety of understory trees, ornamental shrubs and perennials that are appropriate for the size of the site and character of the neighborhood. There is 5 feet of exposed brick below the windows on the front façade of the home. The City’s contracted landscape architect recommends more vertical plantings at the foundation wall and behind the other proposed smaller plantings to soften the expanse of exposed brick. No trees will be removed from the site, and the plan proposes 25- caliper-inches of new deciduous and broadleaf evergreen trees. One existing street tree is proposed to be removed and replaced with two new street trees. The Public Works Department is of the opinion that the street tree is in good condition and therefore does not approve of its removal. An existing 30-caliper-inch Magnolia on site will be impacted during construction, and is shown to be protected and preserved per City guidelines. Exterior lighting is proposed at the rear exterior doors and at the garage. All exterior lights will be 75 watts or less. Susan noted that the height, setbacks, and impervious coverage as proposed are in conformance with the requirements of the R-2 Single Family Dwelling District and the Clayton Gardens Urban Design District. Storm water will be adequately managed on site, and the landscape plan features a variety of understory trees, ornamental shrubs and perennials that are appropriate for the size of the site and character of the neighborhood. Staff is of the opinion that the project meets the criteria for site plan approval and therefore recommends approval with the condition that the applicant submit a revised landscape plan showing additional vertical plantings at the foundation wall and behind the other proposed smaller plantings to soften the expanse of exposed brick on the front façade, and the protection and preservation of the existing street tree.
Mr. Volz presented a site plan to the members, noting that the house features a rear entry garage. He pointed out the locations of the HVAC & trash enclosure and noted that the street tree will be saved. A storm water flow graph depicting current flow and proposed flow was shown. He indicated that storm water flow will be reduced. He stated that a 1-2 foot tall wall will separate the driveways.
Chairman Lichtenfeld asked if the new driveway will be lower than the adjacent driveway.
exceeds the height of the adjacent structure at the side yard. The required side yard setbacks are 7.09 feet and the proposed setback is 13.55 feet on the north side.
The primary building material for the proposed home is red brick with taupe James Hardie siding. The proposed roof is clad in architectural shingles, weathered wood in color. White double hung windows are proposed. A 10-foot wide exposed aggregate driveway is proposed on the north side of the home that leads to a rear-entry, at-grade attached garage with two white paneled garage doors. A maximum 1.5-foot tall stacked stone retaining wall is proposed along the north side of the driveway and adjacent to the rear deck. No permanent fences are proposed. Susan stated that the project as proposed is in conformance with the requirements of the R-2 Single Family Dwelling District, the Clayton Gardens Urban Design District, and the Architectural Review Guidelines. Staff is of the opinion that the design is compatible in terms of mass, height, and design with existing nearby homes and that staff recommends approval as submitted.
Mr. Stevens presented a color rendering and samples of the roof, brick, and cement board. He explained that this is a 2-story, 2,676 square foot 3 bedroom, 2.5 bath residence that is primarily brick with some Hardie Board siding.
Chairman Lichtenfeld commented that it does respect the lower houses.
He explained that this is a 2-story, 2,676 square foot 3 bedroom, 2.5 bath residence that is primarily brick with some Hardie Board siding. Chairman Lichtenfeld commented that it does respect the lower houses.
4 Sherry Eisenberg asked if there was a possibility of adding more windows on the right side.
Mr. Stevens indicated that that’s the location of the closet and master bath.
Sherry Eisenberg noted that the lower house will basically be looking at a brick wall.
Chairman Lichtenfeld stated that they could recommend looking at adding more windows.
Sherry Eisenberg indicated that is a good idea.
Mr. Stevens asked about putting a transom window in the master bath.
Chairman Lichtenfeld stated that he didn’t have anything specific in mind. He asked if the window on that side is a basement window.
Mr. Stevens replied “yes”.
Josh Corson asked about the cut stone accent on the front façade.
Mr. Stevens stated that it is like likestone; a cut stone.
Mr. Stecko, owner, informed the members that he could put some transom windows in the closets.
Chairman Lichtenfeld noted that transom windows are quite high.
Being no further questions or comments, Chairman Lichtenfeld called for a motion.
Ron Reim made a motion to approve with the condition that a transom window be added to the closet and master bedroom to be approved by staff. The motion was seconded by Craig Owens and unanimously approved by the Board.
Chairman Lichtenfeld asked when they plan to break ground.
Mr. Stecko replied “as soon as the permit is issued.”
SITE PLAN REVIEW/ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW – NEW CONSTRUCTION – SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE – 8173 STRATFORD
Lauren Strutman, project architect, was in attendance. Also in attendance were David Volz, project civil engineer, and Scott, Blair and Mark Mehlman, developers.
Susan Istenes explained that this is a request for review of the site plan associated with the proposed construction of a 3,885-square-foot (excluding the basement) single-family residence