Citation in context

#q1e2517e4
minutes 2025-05-05 City meeting records #q1e2517e4 Open original ↗

May 5, 2025 — Meeting Minutes

These are the minutes of the City Plan Commission/Architectural Review Board meeting held May 5, 2025. The document records attendance, approval of the prior meeting minutes, and agenda items including architectural sign review at 190 Carondelet Plaza (approved as submitted), accessory-structure review for a detached garage at 63 Arundel Place (application continued), and a request for additional impervious coverage at 8021 Venetian Drive (recommendation to approve with conditions including a deed restriction and engineering assessment of a dry-well sized for a 15‑year, 20‑minute storm). The minutes also note staff presentations and discussion on potential downtown short-term rental regulations and recommended changes to lot-coverage regulations, and adjournment at 8:05 p.m.
Cited passage
2. To ensure the future maintenance and operation of the dry-well drive, the applicant shall record a

deed restriction noting the location and maintenance requirements of the dry-well system and shall submit proof of the recording prior to issuance of a Building Permit. Brandon Colemen, applicant, was present on behalf of the project. PC-ARB discussed the project with the applicant. Bob Denlow made a motion to recommend approval with the following conditions:

Susan Buse seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously.

3. 8021 Venetian Drive – Plan Commission – Impervious Coverage (00:35:19) Consideration of a request by Brandon Colemen, Applicant, on behalf of Ross Corrigan Trust, Owner, for consideration of additional impervious coverage.

Hobie Kropp provided a summary of the staff report with a recommendation to approve with the following conditions:

engineer. The report must assess the performance of the proposed drywell based on the anticipated impact of a 15-year, 20-minute storm event. Should the results indicate that the proposed drywell is insufficient to accommodate the stormwater runoff generated by this event, the applicant shall be required to upsize the drywell accordingly to ensure adequate performance and compliance with applicable stormwater management standards.

engineer. The report must assess the performance of the proposed drywell based on the anticipated impact of a 15-year, 20-minute storm event. Should the results indicate that the proposed drywell is insufficient to accommodate the stormwater runoff generated by this event, the applicant shall be required to upsize the drywell accordingly to ensure adequate performance and compliance with applicable stormwater management standards.

deed restriction noting the location and maintenance requirements of the dry-well system and shall submit proof of the recording prior to issuance of a Building Permit. Susan Buse seconded the motion. The motion carried with four votes in favor and three opposed.

DISCUSSION SESSION

Original document

This document is too large to preview here. Open the original ↗.

Open original ↗ Open full document Report an error →