The antenna will be visible from adjacent taller buildings; however, the pole appears similar to a typical metal light pole. Staff is of the opinion that the proposed antenna

3 and light pole is compatible with the alleyway conditions and will not negatively impact the neighborhood character and recommends approval as submitted.

Mr. Marcus stated the pole/equipment will be at the alley in the parking lot behind The Diamond Shop. He stated that the 16 X 26 antenna will be on top of the 38.5-foot tall pole, which includes a light at 34 feet.

Chairman Lichtenfeld asked if the pole is new.

Mr. Marcus replied “yes”.

Scott Wilson asked about the pole cover.

Mr. Marcus stated it is galvanized.

Hearing no further questions or comments and hearing nothing from the audience, Ron Reim made a motion to approve as submitted. The motion was seconded by Scott Wilson and unanimously approved by the Board.

ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW – EXTERIOR ALTERATION – SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE – 7620 MARYLAND AVENUE

Paul Doerner, project architect, was in attendance at the meeting.

Susan Istenes explained that this is a request for review of the design and materials associated with proposed alterations to the existing façade, a new front walkway framed with two pillars, the construction of a covered front porch with a Juliet-balcony and a shrub wall; the proposed alterations will impact all four elevations of the existing home. The proposed façade alterations include painting all sides of the building grey, adding black shutters to the front elevation windows and adding black iron planter boxes below the front elevation windows. The new walkway and porch are constructed of concrete stamped with a brick pattern. The proposed covered front porch is constructed of iron columns and a black metal roof. The Juliet-balcony features a black iron railing, matching the proposed planter boxes, and a black metal roof. Two brick pillars with coach lights are proposed framing the new walkway with a shrub wall extending east and west from the pillars. The existing home has a primary building material of red brick with secondary materials of stone and tan stucco. The home features tan casement windows and grey/black roof shingles. Painting the entire façade grey will simplify the appearance of the existing structure and blend the different façade materials. The block features homes with various primary building materials including red brick, painted brick, stone and siding. Staff is of the opinion that the proposed façade painting is compatible with the existing neighborhood character. Window shutters are a common accent piece on the existing homes in the neighborhood. The addition of black shutters and planter boxes will add traditional architectural elements to the house. A new concrete walkway with a stamped brick pattern is proposed in the front yard connecting the porch to the

The addition of black shutters and planter boxes will add traditional architectural elements to the house. A new concrete walkway with a stamped brick pattern is proposed in the front yard connecting the porch to the

4 sidewalk. Stamped concrete is a preferred paving material and the proposed brick pattern is consistent with the house. Staff is of the opinion that the proposed shutters, planter boxes and walkway are compatible with the neighborhood character. The new front porch will extend approximately 5 feet from the front wall of the home, as allowed by the zoning code. The proposed porch will accentuate the existing front entrance. The design and materials will add character and depth along the front elevation. Front porches and covered entrances are common along the block. The proposed porch with a second story balcony is unique, while still being compatible with surrounding properties. A new shrub wall is proposed to enclose the front entryway. The wall will be approximately 26 inches tall with 2.5 feet tall brick columns on either side of the front walkway. Coach lights are proposed on top of the columns. Brick is a preferred front yard wall material per the Architectural Review Guidelines. Staff is of the opinion that the proposed design and materials of the wall and pillars are compatible with the house and neighborhood character. The proposed changes will increase impervious coverage on the lot. In the R-2 Zoning District, maximum impervious coverage in the front yard is 45 percent and maximum total lot coverage is 55 percent. The proposed project will increase front yard impervious coverage to approximately 26.4 percent and total lot coverage to 44.2 percent, which is below the maximum allowed. The existing tree located in the center of the front elevation will be removed as part of the project. The tree contributes a large canopy to the front yard and neighborhood. It is recommended that a new front yard tree is planted to replace the lost canopy coverage on site. Director Istenes continued by stating that the project as proposed is in conformance with the requirements of the R-2 Single Family Dwelling District and the Architectural Review Guidelines. Staff is of the opinion that the design and materials of the alteration are compatible with the neighborhood and recommends approval with the condition that the applicant plant a tree of the same or similar species to the tree being removed.

Mr. Doerner presented a photo of the existing house and a color rendering, after proposed renovations are implemented. He stated that the owners are trying to update and improve the home’s appearance, especially because the addition is different than the original house. He noted that the addition of a porch and walkway will help identify the entryway. He informed the members that the owner’s would prefer not to plan a new tree so they would like to retain the existing tree and simply have it trimmed.

Chairman Lichtenfeld stated that the proposed changes are an improvement and will result in the home being more consistent with other homes on the street.

Ron Reim stated that he prefers the existing tree remain and trimming it back is acceptable.

Chairman Lichtenfeld agreed.

Rosemary Hardy, 7603 Maryland Avenue, asked how far the front porch sticks out.

Mr. Doerner stated that it projects just a bit further north than the stone addition.

One bicycle rack with the capacity for approximately 7 bicycles is proposed at the main entrance to the building. Trash and recycling dumpsters will be located in a screened enclosure at the southwest corner off the site, along the

6 service drive. The proposed multi-purpose building is located perpendicular to Brentwood Boulevard, set between the proposed ice rink and the existing tennis courts. The main entrance to the building is oriented toward Brentwood Boulevard. The existing storm water runoff, according to the MSD 15 year, 20 minute calculation, is 7.72 cubic feet per second (CFS). The proposed runoff is 8.42 CFS, which represents an increase of 0.70 CFS. Bio-retention areas are proposed for water quality treatment and runoff reduction. The property is over one acre and therefore MSD requires water quality mitigation, not water quantity mitigation. The storm water plan has been reviewed and deemed acceptable. Impervious coverage in the R-2 Zoning District is limited to 55 percent of the total lot area. The proposed project will increase the amount of impervious coverage within the project limits from 56 percent to 68 percent. The proposed project is located in a portion of the larger park area, which will remain under the maximum impervious coverage limit. Multiple forms of lighting are proposed for walkways, stairs, entries and the ice rink. All exterior lighting will be shielded or cut-off to prevent spillover onto adjacent properties. On June 30, 2017, the proposed project was presented to the Plan Commission for Conceptual Review. During the meeting, members of the Plan Commission and the public commented on the proposed design and voiced various concerns to be addressed as the design was finalized. Some of the comments made during the meeting resulted in changes to the plans, while other comments were not directly addressed. Conceptual review occurs without a formal staff review prior to the meeting and since the conceptual review meeting staff has completed a more thorough review. Because of the public nature of the proposed project, staff feels it is important to include additional analysis of the comments and concerns voiced during conceptual review, especially those that have not led to changes in the proposed design. The proposed project will result in significant change to a highly visible and notable area of the City that has appeared as it does today for many generations. Staff recognizes that large changes to public places can have increased impacts to communities and residents. Re-development of the site provides the opportunity to address outdated aspects and operational inefficiencies of the existing facility. Currently, the building located adjacent to the ice rink serves little to no purpose in the months when the ice rink is not in operation, while at the same time the tennis courts lack a true indoor facility for management and operation of the courts. The location of the proposed building allows the facility to appropriately support both uses and host activity year round. The proposed location will result in the loss of mature trees; however, the location will be more aligned with goals of the Downtown Master Plan and preferred planning practices by locating the building near the street. Year round activity within the building will also be more visible from the street. The proposed location of the building results in the ice rink being shifted west and located further from Brentwood Boulevard than the current location. The existing ice rink is a vital contributor to the character of the park during the winter months. The current location allows skaters to be seen from South Brentwood Boulevard. While the proposed location will make the rink less visible, it will not be completely out of sight. The proposed lawn area between the ice rink and Brentwood Boulevard will preserve sight lines from certain areas. The activity located inside of the building will also be adjacent to the street to supplement the reduced ice rink views. Staff is of the opinion that the proposed rink location will result in a more efficient site layout and will positively contribute to the character of the area year round. Director Istenes noted that the proposed project is in conformance with the requirements of the R-2 Zoning District and the Shaw Park Master Plan. Storm water will be adequately managed on site. The landscape

Storm water will be adequately managed on site. The landscape

7 plan features a variety of native species, shrubs and trees. Staff is of the opinion that the project meets the criteria for site plan approval and recommends approval with the following conditions:

1) The applicant shall address outstanding comments outlined in the City’s contracted landscape architect’s review letter dated December 4, 2017. 2) The applicant shall address outstanding comments outlined in the City’s contracted SWPPP reviewer’s letter dated December 1, 2017.

Parks Director DeForrest informed the Plan Commission members that they have held several meetings since their prior appearance (conceptual review) and the design has been modified based on feedback and site adjustments resulting primarily from comments from the engineer.

Mr. Testo began a PowerPoint presentation. Slides depicting site photos and the proposed site plan were shown.

Mr. Wohlschlaeger indicated that overall the massing is the same. He noted that a traffic study was completed and the current plan provides a pedestrian crossing only on the north side; the south side has been modified to accommodate vehicular movements. He noted that the streetscape will be expanded along Brentwood Boulevard to align with the Master Plan and desire for visibility.

Chairman Lichtenfeld noted that the ice rink is lower than the greenspace; he asked about a control fence and/or fence, questioning how one enters the rink.

Mr. Testo stated that the rink will be entirely enclosed; he showed the members the access on the site plan.

Chairman Lichtenfeld asked if the east façade of the building will align with the pol building to the north.

Mr. Testo replied “yes”.

Ron Reim noted that there was previously a connection to the tennis building.

Mr. Testo stated that has not changed; he believes the benefits will override the longer walk.

Scott Wilson asked about the City’s landscape architect comments.

Mr. Wohlschlaeger stated that although they are removing larger trees, they are adding some.