Citation in context

#q7f125fef
transcript 2026-03-11 Board meeting video #q7f125fef

March 11, 2026 — Meeting Transcript

This is a transcript of the Clayton School District Board of Education meeting held March 11, 2026. Excerpts cover updates on community engagement around Proposition O (including public events and facility tours), presentations on social studies curriculum goals and instructional practices (like inquiry skills, lateral reading, and CER), and discussion of district technology use (device policies, platforms, age-appropriate guidelines, and process improvements). The excerpts record logistical plans (coffee conversations, tours, parent‑teacher conferences) and a motion to adjourn the meeting; no numerical votes or budget figures appear in the provided excerpts.
Cited passage

So we wanted to make sure that everybody is kind of aware and grounded of why we're coming this early as opposed to having everything sort of tied up in a nice neat bow for you because it's not tied up in a nice neat bow and you'll find that as we talk through this. But there was Senate Bill 68 came to fruition in the I think in the spring of last year or in the summer and the board policy that we talked about devices and what that was going to look like so personal electronic devices at that time and we made a decision of a one year sort of hiatus of kind of dealing with students bringing their own devices to the high school in particular and so we knew that we needed to study and really have some thinking about what our device fleet would look like from the district moving forward because we knew that we knew that Chromebooks were no longer adequate for the things that our students needed to do within the teaching and learning environment and also that we were relying on personal electronic devices to help with some of that teaching and learning so that's what accelerated our pace. We're also acutely aware of House Bill 2230 which is the one that's going through right now being discussed within the legislation about the amount of time that we need to have with our particularly our youngest learners are on devices and so that has influenced some of our thinking and will continue to influence our thinking and we have had a lot of conversation about that so you'll see bread crumbs of that and you won't see that tied up in a nice repo but we are working on that.

Equitable personalized and individualized learning experiences highlighted. So I think as we've engaged in this work around technology one of the things Jeff and I used to talk about this Luke and I continue to talk about this philosophy of the purposeful integration of technology and teaching and learning and that it's not even about devices. It's more about the work that we do with those devices in thinking about our profile of a Clayton learner as well as our thinking around empowered learning and so a lot of our focus this year with technology has been how can we use it as a tool to empower students in the work that they're doing within the classroom. So a little bit different from the other self-studies that will come to you that we'll be talking about this spring. We are coming halfway through a study. So we wanted to make sure that everybody is kind of aware and grounded of why we're coming this early as opposed to having everything sort of tied up in a nice neat bow for you because it's not tied up in a nice neat bow and you'll find that as we talk through this.

We are coming halfway through a study. So we wanted to make sure that everybody is kind of aware and grounded of why we're coming this early as opposed to having everything sort of tied up in a nice neat bow for you because it's not tied up in a nice neat bow and you'll find that as we talk through this. But there was Senate Bill 68 came to fruition in the I think in the spring of last year or in the summer and the board policy that we talked about devices and what that was going to look like so personal electronic devices at that time and we made a decision of a one year sort of hiatus of kind of dealing with students bringing their own devices to the high school in particular and so we knew that we needed to study and really have some thinking about what our device fleet would look like from the district moving forward because we knew that we knew that Chromebooks were no longer adequate for the things that our students needed to do within the teaching and learning environment and also that we were relying on personal electronic devices to help with some of that teaching and learning so that's what accelerated our pace.

But there was Senate Bill 68 came to fruition in the I think in the spring of last year or in the summer and the board policy that we talked about devices and what that was going to look like so personal electronic devices at that time and we made a decision of a one year sort of hiatus of kind of dealing with students bringing their own devices to the high school in particular and so we knew that we needed to study and really have some thinking about what our device fleet would look like from the district moving forward because we knew that we knew that Chromebooks were no longer adequate for the things that our students needed to do within the teaching and learning environment and also that we were relying on personal electronic devices to help with some of that teaching and learning so that's what accelerated our pace. We're also acutely aware of House Bill 2230 which is the one that's going through right now being discussed within the legislation about the amount of time that we need to have with our particularly our youngest learners are on devices and so that has influenced some of our thinking and will continue to influence our thinking and we have had a lot of conversation about that so you'll see bread crumbs of that and you won't see that tied up in a nice repo but we are working on that. The other piece we knew as we were talking about what needed to happen with district devices is that we have multiple platforms that are operating right now and so his team has a pretty heavy lift with those multiple platforms and those decisions were made purposefully the last time that we did a technology study but we think we've outgrown our thinking at that time and so our thinking has shifted and some of that is influenced by the need to have some consistency across the system so across the entire district and then like I said technology and learning.

We're also acutely aware of House Bill 2230 which is the one that's going through right now being discussed within the legislation about the amount of time that we need to have with our particularly our youngest learners are on devices and so that has influenced some of our thinking and will continue to influence our thinking and we have had a lot of conversation about that so you'll see bread crumbs of that and you won't see that tied up in a nice repo but we are working on that. The other piece we knew as we were talking about what needed to happen with district devices is that we have multiple platforms that are operating right now and so his team has a pretty heavy lift with those multiple platforms and those decisions were made purposefully the last time that we did a technology study but we think we've outgrown our thinking at that time and so our thinking has shifted and some of that is influenced by the need to have some consistency across the system so across the entire district and then like I said technology and learning. It's not about devices. Tonight is going to feel about devices and I think we're we feel like we have to sort of overtly talk about that but knowing that isn't really the purpose of our work. The purpose of our work is how children use these tools to help advance learning. Okay I feel like I've said enough about that.